Any basis for fact at all on this?

I like CT as much as the next man for enjoyment factor but wow anyone can hit the keyboard and express any 'possibility' whatsoever. Actual theories are borne out of research, out-of-the-ordinary events, some basis in fact and also first-hand knowledge.

If you're only basis for reasoning is "obama didn't look startled and upset on screen!" and "a president never gives a weather warning, something is up! - well, uh.. it's a bit thin. Maybe he wanted to portray a strong, calm stance and also just exercise his desire to go on camera and advise people personally, especially so close to the election.

And well, a tropical storm.. we don't see those every year. Just because one happened to hit closer in-land than the rest doesn't make it some kind of engineered experiment, it's called nature.

I'm not trying to be the big skeptic on this one but frankly dude consider the following:

a) if the government wanted to wipe you out, they wouldn't need to distract you and play deception games with you. They simply wouldn't tell you, then they would just do it. Unless you think somehow a small band of rebels could retake the planet/country.

b) if this 'wipe out event' is known by the government but there's really nothing they can do to control it, it is in NO way a wise idea to suddenly TELL EVERYONE THE TRUTH before you know it's coming as human nature always says "it may not happen". Let's cause a country to destroy itself on a remote possibility a grey told me about, that would be a rather self-fulfilling prophecy then no?