ok i give up, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
of course you are... because the more you try to duhbunk and deny facts or the evidence, the more of an arse you like.
you've continued to ignore the evidence that doesn't support or conform to your flawed logic and arguments.
if you dont admit when you are wrong i wont bother anymore, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
Wait, let me get this straight...
you're again CLAIMING that you allegedly have proved me wrong or I "failed" as you falsely state here... Thread: MAJOR QUAKE WARNING ALERT Magnitude 7+ to 8+ imminent 1111 to 113 (Page 2)
Then I show ACTUAL EVIDENCE and FACTS that support my claim here Thread: MAJOR 7.4 (8.2 high readings) hits 1 day off 11/9 Major Quake Warning posted in August!
....which PROVES you're the one thats WRONG, and then what do you do???
You do exactly what I've been saying you do again...
you ignore the EVIDENCE and FACTS I've just presented which contradicts your claim... Thread: MASSIVE 7.7 QUAKE HITS BRITISH COLUMBIA LEY-LINES of 188 EXACT DATE & REGION & TWZ DATE WARNED! Wow
and then you REPEAT the same debunked argument posting a new post I'm now answering where you're again saying I'm wrong....
Do the words POT KETTLE BLACK mean anything to you?
whats even funnier is that you're claiming I failed, yet at the same time admit I hit the mark on Queen Charlotte.
make up your mind.
it is just ridiculousyou make specific predictions, with well defined +/- days windows and magnitudes, and when you fail them you say its a hit? ok man, that says a lot about your credibility Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
So someone that predicts that on 10/27 a MAJOR QUAKE 7+ will occur and hit specific Ley Lines, and then ON 10/27, a MAJOR 7.7 quake hits the Ley Lines but according to you, thats not specific, well defined +- days windows and magnitudes, and a FAIL???
Excuse me for a second...
If I've been wrong, I've admitted it, UNLIKE YOU who only continues to deny the facts, evidence, and context as I've explained.
Because you know if you answered what I've said or explained, you'd have to acknowledge what you're in denial of which is the evidence I've presented validating the 188 ley lines and quake warnings that have an almost 90%+ accuracy.
Now if you want to believe
its "ridiculous" and the warnings I've put out have failed or what I've presented is false, OK MAN, because you have every right to your OPINION, but it doesn't make it true especially when you ignore the evidence that proves otherwise which anyone with a brain can understand and see is true when they analyze it objectively.
I can show over a year of DIRECT HITS that have a level of accuracy science claims is IMPOSSIBLE.
So far, you've failed miserably to support anything you've ASSerted and claimed because when your arguments are scrutinized, they lack any objective context and evidence against what I've presented, explained and challenged skeptics to prove wrong.
In other words, your track record trying to duhbunk the evidence and what I've presented, has been an epic FAIL and you're just upset about it and that I've just made another 1 day off hit for a major quake.