Ok, lets put it even easier. Just answer my questions with YES or NO. Just that. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
I'll answer accordingly since there's context in each that's NOT black and white and yes or no in the way you're arguing/implying.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
Did a 6.8 appear in station readings for that quake?
So I CAN argue this particular quake as a HIT.
another 6.7+ quake would hit in 25/10 - 27/10, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
which was a direct DIRECT HIT
and finally another 6.7+ would hit in 10/31 - 11/01. Yes or no? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
As I've already said MISS! but I also posted these various links that put things in further and proper context which you're ignoring. Thread: GREAT QUAKE TO HIT WITHIN NEXT 3 MAJOR SEISMIC WARNING WINDOWS??? Unofficial GLP HALLOWEEN QUAKE PREDICTION CONTEST! (Page 3)
Only one 6.7+ quake hit during the predicted windows. Yes or no? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
Moreover you said "with a 99% confidence is that there WON'T BE A QUAKE 7+ on any other date in NOVEMBER outside the dates/windows I've named" Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
Were you right?
Didnt the Guatemala quake hit outisde the windows? yes or no? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
So you're saying ONE DAY OFF is OUTSIDE the window??? lol
thats what you're saying right???
Just answer this questions please. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
ffs the first window did not have any 6.7+ quake.
YET THE FACTS PROVE OTHERWISE.
A) Its an irrefutable FACT, I warned a 6.7+ would appear for that window which is exactly what happened... in fact, there were readings as high as 6.8
check the official mag.. and they are not downgraded on purpose.. why would they do it? just to annoy you? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
B) I've addressed THAT "official mag" argument
several times for which I have yet to see anyone present any intelligent counter-arguement refuting or addressing what I'VE said and showing how and where its illogical, unreasonable or a false premise
C) Please show any evidence to support your claim that this issue has anything to do with DOWNGRADING to "annoy" me or they "do it on purpose". lol Thats absurd and IRRELEVANT because if ANY EVIDENCE can be presented that USGS has been wrong, had erroneous data, they've manipulated data, or no one can show exactly how and where the evidence for my argument is wrong, then my premise MUST be taken into account or considered by those claiming what you are because it puts USGS' credibility as an infallible honest reliable authority/agency, INTO QUESTION.
Its called CHECKS AND BALANCES which Usgs DOES NOT HAVE, let alone as a GOVERNMENT AGENCY, they're a branch of/part of/linked to, or connected to the SAME group/CABAL that has beyond any shadow of a doubt, lied, controlled, and manipulated information if not HUMANS for MILLENNIA.... and thats just for starters.
Only someone in a state of incredible ignorance and denial, would deny the mountains of evidence which prove it beyond a doubt.
D) but then again, please SEE "A" because "C" is STILL IRRELEVANT in that context.
you had one hit in 4 windows. i call hat a miss Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
A) No, I had 2 hits in 3 windows. So the facts prove otherwise and contradict your claims for which you still fail to address and show how what I've said is illogical or is not correct/valid.
B) Besides, what's a "miss"? MISS doesn't mean FAILURE in the way you're trying to imply.
But then, even if I "missed" 1 or 2, which is exactly the argument I've presented that you keep avoiding and refusing to acknowledge for some reason, WHATS YOUR POINT?
C) And even if I were to concede your argument, of the 3 windows, only 1
was a MAJOR
7+ (but not just any 7 mag) which ALSO and more importantly, just "happened" to hit on THE EXACT DATE
(oh and please don't bother bringing up your "stat" argument again, because I've already addressed it and shown why it's a false premise to which i have yet to see any intelligent argument showing exactly how, why or where its wrong and not valid).
and about the last question.. dont make a fool of yourself, you know what i am talking about.. in one prediction you said no quakes would happen outside the given windows.. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
If you're not the real fool, you'd admit and be able to understand WHY it is.
oh, almost forgot... here's a little kindergarten level date-code riddle that's about to connect to a major headline event shortly involving a type of platetonic solid that moves above and below.
So lets see if you'll be able to understand the connection to 113 and a well-known "power" number within the sum of this very special myan algorithm
1 12 22 12 that when doubled makes the date of the show.
and since one did you recover some old prediction saying it would? so either case you would always be right? lol.. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
How can I or rather can't I "RECOVER" an OLD PREDICTION if its been POSTED, let alone wasn't cancelled? LOL
What does a posted date thats not cancelled, have anything to do with being wrong?
Ever hear the term "semantics"? Because in this case, it applies to your game.
you have predictions that contradict one another, very nice tactic Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
except the facts and evidence prove otherwise.
And NO, I have WARNINGS that have not only been extremely accurate, but have hit a level of accuracy that conventional science says is IMPOSSIBLE.
your denial and evasions are pretty lame tactics