AND WHAT WERE DATES I NAMED IN WHAT I CALLED THE NOVEMBER
QUAKE WARNING SHERLOCK???11/9, 11/11 & 11/13
The ORIGINAL has been ARCHIVED FOR MONTHS and this was simply based on THE ORIGINAL. At worst a typo and forgot to post a reminder! lol
But in fact, there's an ESOTERIC date CODE within an ALLEGORICAL CONTEXT that reiterates and references 11/11 several times as well as 11/9 and also the 113 algorithm I've EXPLAINED MANY TIMES!
Just because you can't comprehend simple date codes and allegory, isn't my fault.
Who is lying here? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
your windows were 11/1 - 11/3, 11/16 - 11/17 and 11/25 - 11/27...
....AND 11/9, 11/11 & 11/13
So again, this was simply ONE of SEVERAL TIMES
I've posted THE QUAKE WARNING FOR NOVEMBER
which has been ARCHIVED FOR MONTHS and BASED ON THE ORIGINAL.
Not my fault you didn't see it even though its been CLEARLY and PUBLICLY posted for months.
guatemala quake was 11/7, thus outside the windows Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
11/8 appeared for the date as well.
If you want to argue semantics about a MAJOR QUAKE being off by 1 day or 20 hours from 11/9 which I warned as a TARGET DATE/KEY QUAKE WINDOW for a MAJOR Quake to occur, thats up to you, but it doesn't by any stretch of your imagination, invalidate or disprove what I've explained.
So you had an old prediction saying a quake would hit, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
being "OLD" has nothing to do with the issue nor does it invalidate or negate that it is STILL POSTED let alone that no where did I ever say it was CANCELLED. LOL
so OLD, that your not as bright as you used to be... or maybe its just that you need to take some geritol.
and a recent one saying no quake would hit outisde the given windows, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
THE "GIVEN WINDOWS" WERE TAKEN FROM THE ORIGINAL "PREDICTION"/WARNING which was the WARNING FOR NOVEMBER 2012.
thus, no quake would hit the date you previously predicted.. who is lying here? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
Either that or you're just playing semantics because you're unable to prove what I've explained is wrong or illogical. Why? Because you can't argue the facts and evidence for my argument.
or was it usgs or even the reptilians that manipulated your own posts?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462
The only manipulation going on is your denial of the facts because you didn't realize the warning was taken from the ORIGINAL WARNING posted 2 months ago.
If it didn't exist or was deleted, erased, cancelled and altered, then your argument might be valid.
SORRY you can't handle or comprehend that there's a TIME-STAMPED and archived quake warning for NOVEMBER (which INCLUDED THE DATES YOU CLAIM IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT-IOW ADDING
DATES TO A WARNING DIFFERENT!) posted back in August and September.
Those with a brain who've done research and have kept up with things, have seen it.
get over it. The more you deny or argue that fact, the more foolish you look.