BREAKING: More Romney votes being switched to Obama by rigged voting machines. This time in Ohio

It must be karma for Ohio, after swapping Gore votes for Bush with those same machines.

And seeing how both candidates are nothing but puppets for the hand behind the curtain do you really think your vote is worth a shit?

Subject should be: "A Romney vote switched to Obama by faulty voting machine" according to link.

NOPE. Soros bought machines for Obama and Romney bought machines for himself. Tit for tat but thus far no Obama votes switched to Romney votes have been reported.

Once or twice is a malfunction. Multiple times in different states is a pattern. Get with the program slick.

Third world antics.

hahahah im so glad they are getting caught at every corner good work

We should worry about our democratic society.

it wouldn't surprise me if both parties hired hackers to switch the votes. Big money and a lot of power is at stake for both sides.

[link to www.dslreports.com]

Good. Go Obama!

so sez canadian user id 26539904: sorry tinkerbell I prefer to deal with facts

The inbred toothless, looney right wingers are getting desperate for excuses, face it you bunch of nutters Romney the right wing flunky doesnt stand a chance

Welp. Pretty sure the same thing happened to Ron Paul. Cry me a river

Everyone

Report ant voter fraud to FBI hotline,!!!!!!L!!

I voted today and the machine worked fine..

We need evidence...SOmeone who can video record their process OF VOTING and share it with the media would be great...
As americans we need to confront this immediately!!!

well the ohio republican did introduce willard as 'the next president,Mr Obama'

You idiots keep trying to use this bullshit as proof of fraud!

THE FUCKING TOUCHSCREENS ARE OUT OF CALIBRATION!!

FUCKING IDIOTS!

You think they would intentionally try to fraud voters right in front of their faces where they can see it? ...evidence is in that it is being witnessed and reported!! ...and those machines are promptly fixed!

This is how votes are being stolen:


Rigged Elections for Romney?
[link to www.americanpolitics.com]
Researchers found a consistent pattern of vote flipping for Mitt Romney in the 2012 Republican primaries. Will that transfer to the general election, asks Michael Collins?

"Vote" signA group of independent researchers caught a pattern of apparent vote flipping during the 2012 Republican primaries that consistently favored Mitt Romney. A form of election fraud, vote flipping occurs when votes are changed from one candidate to another or several others during electronic voting and vote tabulation. (Image: Dean Terry)

Vote flipping is difficult to detect because the vote totals remain the same for each precinct. In one of several possible scenarios, an instruction is given to a precinct level voting machine or to a county-level central tabulator. The corrupted totals from precincts are sent from county election officials to state elections board and published as final results. (Primary documents for this article: Republican Primary Election 2012 Results: Amazing Statistical Anomalies, August 13, 2012 and 2008/2012 Election Anomalies, Results, Analysis and Concerns, September 2012).

The group's analysis is based on raw data from primary sources, local precincts, and state and county election records. The pattern of vote flipping raises serious doubts about the Romney victories in the 2012 Republican primaries in Wisconsin and the Ohio. Apparent vote flipping was demonstrated in the group’s paper for at least nine other 2012 Republican primaries as well.

The findings showed a consistent pattern of increasing votes and vote percentages for Romney in the precinct vote tally. The pattern emerges when precinct vote tallies are presented by candidate based on the size of a county precinct.

I don't trust the machines.

Everyone should dip their finger in ink and put their fingerprint on the proper box.

Oh, and you vote should be recorded to your SSN.

No SSN, no vote.

More evidence:

NSA Analyst Proves GOP Is Stealing Elections

[link to www.ukprogressive.co.uk]

UPDATED: Why is Mitt Romney so confident?

In states where the winner will be decided by less than 10%, of the vote he already knows he will win. This is no tinfoil hat conspiracy. It’s a maths problem. And mathematics showed changes in actual raw voting data that had no statistical correlation other than programmable computer fraud. This computer fraud resulted in votes being flipped from Democrat to Republican in every federal, senatorial, congressional and gubernatorial election since 2008 (thus far) and in the 2012 primary contests from other Republicans to Mitt Romney.

This goes well beyond Romney’s investment control in voting machine maker Hart Intercivic and Diebold’s close ties to George W. Bush. Indeed all five voting machine companies have very strong GOP fundraising ties, yet executives (including the candidate’s son Tagg Romney) insist there is no conflict between massively supporting one party financially whilst controlling the machines that record and count the votes.

A retired NSA analyst has spent several sleepless nights applying a simple formula to past election results across Arizona. His results showed across-the-board systemic election fraud on a coordinated and massive scale. But the analysis indicated that this only happens in larger precincts because anomalies in small precincts can be more easily detected.

All you people here are capable of coming up with is a few petty case vote machines malfunctioning when votes are being STOLEN IN MASS BY THE GOP!

...only reason Obama was able to win last time was because it was such a landslide that even the GOP 10% voter flipping fraud wasn't enough to change the end result.

They have been flipping votes since 2000! Bush would have never won either election and Santorum would be running right now instead Romney if the system honest.

I think it is illegal to do that. I know it is in Canada.

Petty? How to trivialize things.

I have seen testimonies from programmers who have been contacted by state officials for programing fixed counters to spit out a 49-51 count with who ever they choose the winner.

Problem here is the numbers need to be changed progressively and not just at the end or the machine could end up with an actual count of who is voting for who.

I see a huge potential here for programmers to make errors in a massively complicated task.

Realize that your vote changing from "A" to "B" as a balancing act.

This is why they use the media to keep it close guys.

You can only choose who your winner is when you convince the public that the race extremely close or it can't be rigged at all.


--------
What is more important to ask here is...

Who?

If you believe it is one campaign or another that is your opinion.....I just disagree.


Plausible doubt is a bitch isn't it.

If this was intentional, the user wouldn't be seeing it happen. The machine would simply log a certain percentage of Romney votes for Obama instead in its internal programming without any visual hint it was happening.

No, as infuriating as it is, its just a screen calibration issue.

The statistical data does not lie moron.

...and just cause you raise a little bsflag doesn't mean shit. I bet you didn't even read either of those articles?