|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Two Causes Manifesting One Singular Effect, Tesla's 3 - 6 - 9, and The Singularity of 0
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Saptaparna |
|
Post Content
|
Reading quantum books wont help. If you want to learn QM you need to do it, as in define the theory, make the calculations, do the experiment and see if works. You cannot learn QM or physics in general by simply reading books.
I guess I'm not saying that the ideas here don't 'work' or are invalid, I'm just curious as to what physical phenomenon
you are attempting to model. I fail to see how this relates to anything in the reality that we live in. You need to measure something, otherwise its about as good as string theory.
Lets start at the top...
Creation is a difficult concept to work with.
Are electron-positron pairs 'created' when a gamma-ray hits an atom? and when the pair annihilates to create more gamma-rays, are these gammas 'created'.
In the above example you have a case where a single gamma-ray photon (no charge) interacting with an atom, creates two other particles (positive and negative, charge still net zero), and then you have a case where two particles come together and create gammas, again no charge no (rest)mass.
So here you have 1 gamma, interacting with 1 atom, to produce 2 particles. Is 4 a acceptable number for creation.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23524705 you know what is funny? quantum reality is not the monopoly of the scientific way of understanding it. scientific understanding through abstract models, mathematical equations and the rest is only away to make sense of reality. but that reality was there from the beginning of time. and as quantum theory comes to terms with the subjective side of reality (i.e. consciousness) making room for understanding the subject in a comprehensive view of reality, this does not dismiss the shorter route of influencing reality at quantum levels directly through subjective consciousness. then again, what you say is true, in the sense that if one wants to get to a clear abstract understanding of the world, he cannot bypass the hard work of devising abstract models of the world, using mathematics and other scientific tools. but there is another way, more practical. which has certain prerequisites which are not simpler to obtain, than in the case of scientific abstract reasoning. 
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
