WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet

...just anyone is not allowed on govt property,good luck with exposing the scam...its in the Nevada desert and the airspace is restricted also...there's no dust on top of that thing,it cant hide from the supposed dust storms of "mars" so it should be covered with dust...and where is the footage of any "martian" dust storms? it wouldn't take a very big dust storm to knock it over and>>>>>>>>> how do you even get dust storms om "mars" without wind/air?

Up next, Man has never flown, all flights have been staged by BAA and anybody claiming to have been on an 'airplane' is a government shill. The government made up planes as a cover story for shooting the twin towers with scud missiles.

True story.

SEVERAL weeks ago, a whistle blower took pictures of the WHOLE MARS scam being done HERE on Earth in the Mojave Desert, WITH people in the picture, FAKE background and SECOND Rover in background, in case first one got in trouble (?).

These are just tire tracks from equipment vehicles used to transport people and objects to the 'scene'.

It's ALL a con, like 99% of the political parasites/banksters USE ON THE GULLIBLE PUBLIC, every day !

Eagle
[/quote

I guess that I could see what you're saying...maybe. All we'd need is a real time satellite photos of the Mojave to be sure of that.

One thing that I would like to know is, why can't we get better pictures of the friggin moon?

[link to photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov]

"Scoop scars can be seen in the regolith in front of the rover."

wow. pin this!!!!!

like seriously !!! wtf who took the picture!!!

how does mars have dust storms without air/oxygen/wind to move the dust?

got any link on this buddy looks interesting

You people are nothing short of brain damage.

[link to www.huffingtonpost.com]

The 1-ton Curiosity rover took 55 hi-res pictures with its Mars Hand Lens Imager camera, or MAHLI, on Oct. 31. Mission scientists then stitched the images together to create a full-color mosaic of Curiosity and its Gale Crater landing site.




Last Edited by Da fuq on 11/04/2012 11:56 AM

pin this :-)

Personally I couldn't answer about the wind. Fortunately 2 seconds on google did. I'm not going to tell you because you will just claim Wikipedia are in on it too.

Also check this out. More photos from the staging shoot:

[link to thedailytrash.wordpress.com]

Plenty of civvies there seem to have got in no problem.

Mars lost its magnetosphere letting charged particles that form solar wind through, the magnetosphere would usually repel such particles.

IMPOSSIBLE. LIAR!

the lens with supposed reflection in it, is inverted.
look close sky at bottom land at top. So look at it upside down.

those aren't civilians,they work for the govt....and i didn't say no one could get in...answer the other question> how the hell does mars have giant dust storms without giant winds/air/oxygen to move all that dust during one of them supposed martian dust storms? their lies are catching up with them...limited oxygen/air on mars,yeah right...

link? I am interested

Indeed. . .

[link to forevergeek.com]

then that "solar" wind would blow all the time and that dust would be moving all the time...the top of that rover looks very clean...and dust blowing all the time would cause a sandblasting effect on the rover...that rover wouldn't last long being sandblasted all the time...those lens would be scratched cloudy in no time...moving dust causes abrasion,wheres it at on that rover if it has been there that long? no surface coatings would last and those lines would be sawed through in no time too...the mars program just went down in the same cloud of dust they lie about...

Last Edited by T Ceti H.C. Radnarg on 11/04/2012 12:15 PM

The area looks very much like the volcanic dunes northeast of Flagstaff Arizona, near the Hopi rez.

Hopi Warnings

[link to www.youtube.com]

That large image looks like a bald guy in a fat-suit, wearing sunglasses.

As you would, in the Mojave!

If the image is made from many smaller images, then every one of them should show a metal arm extending out from the rover to hold the camera. If NASA 'shopped those all out, there should be a statement to that effect, because they usually say when they've enhanced a shot.

So my question is, where is this statement?

Looks Great there!!

Man I want to go there so bad....

Correct. Every image taken of the source (rover) would show the arm that contains the camera.

Is this correct?

I one starred this thread, Twice, for the complete lack of intelligence on it. You people are the Stupidest bunch I have ever seen. Always a conspiracy in EVERYTHING. Dumbasses, the lot of you.

If you look at the lens you can see how it's flipped upside down... The dirt is on top. You can see where the rover pulled forward then backed up. It probably dropped off a camera then backed away. There are no footprints; all the prints have the same tread as the tracks on the rover. The only other marks on the left are probably where either samples were taken or where it originally sat the camera.

duplicate

Last Edited by Hitokiri on 11/04/2012 12:31 PM

here's the other question> as long as that rover has supposedly been on mars ,why hasn't the lens been sandblasted cloudy by the continuous dust storms?...