Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,154 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 313,452
Pageviews Today: 432,703Threads Today: 108Posts Today: 1,942
04:47 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet

 
Sheep # 1
User ID: 26980231
Germany
11/04/2012 12:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
They´re saying with this:
We´re putting it right in your face, how dumb can you even be ?!
T Ceti H.C. Radnarg

User ID: 26878064
United States
11/04/2012 12:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
goodbye mars program hi..blowing sand,even by solar winds causes a sandblasting effect on any rover and none of the rover shots show any wear on them from the sandblasting effect the so called dust storms would cause...so which is it NASA,dust storms no longer exist on mars or the rover isn't on mars,or both?
How unfortunate for some rulers when men,women,and children continue to think... Keep repeating the lies loud enough and long enough and just maybe the people will start to believe the lies again and good luck with that...finding your energy open until mars becomes raging aries...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 836632
United States
11/04/2012 12:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
If the image is made from many smaller images, then every one of them should show a metal arm extending out from the rover to hold the camera. If NASA 'shopped those all out, there should be a statement to that effect, because they usually say when they've enhanced a shot.

So my question is, where is this statement?
 Quoting: Keep2theCode



^^^^THIS
MatrixLNIN11

User ID: 20347511
United States
11/04/2012 12:46 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
[link to www.facebook.com]

NASA HAS SOME SPLAINING TO DO!

LOL

Houston, We have a Problem! Damage Control Incoming

Time to call in David Morrison! ;)

I for one am looking forward to NAZA's, err i mean NASA's response. Any thoughts on what excuse they could possibly come up with this time? Or SILENCE as usual?

So aside from yet another NASA (Never A Straight Answer) screw-up, I KNOW for MOST, this will seem inconceivable and even ludicrous, but those IN THE KNOW, already KNOW Elites go THERE for vacation so to speak, and have been for over 50 years according to Stanley Kubrick (they silenced him a while ago), George Kavassilas, Stewart Swerdlow, David dIcke (of course) ;)) Andrew Basiago, several whistleblower Military Generals, and even President Eisenhower's Great Granddaughter.

[link to reinep.wordpress.com]

"Extra-terrestrials have been working with governments for a while," she said, adding that treaties with the other-worldly beings were signed every 10 years.

She said natural faults in the Earth were being manipulated to produce catastrophes like tsunamis and earthquakes using "Haarp technology" or bio-weapons. According to the website www.haarp.net, Haarp technology is a focused and steerable electromagnetic beam used to heat the upper atmosphere and bounce elecromagnetic waves back to Earth. "As consciousness expands, we invoke and become more in contact with our universal family," said Eisenhower.

She said she was recruited by an agent in 2006 to take part in a mission to a Mars colony. However, she was able to break free from the mind control techniques. She said people had been teleported to Mars since the 1970s and that the size of the population there was continuing to shift and expand. Speaking on a Skype feed from a ranch in the United States, leading Ufologist James Gilliland agreed that dark forces were at play.

This was evident by increasing changes in the Earth's climate and in the astral makeup of the universe. However, he said, another type of extra-terrestrial agent was seeking to prevent Earth's destruction or the depopulation of humankind. "There's definitely something disturbing the Earth. The star patterns are changing, definitely something is going down.

The Earth is doing a major wobble." However, it was with the help of positive agents that humans would be able to ignite their consciousness and become enlightened to the dangers, but also the opportunities that a new world era could bring. "Basically we need to rise to the occasion. We are all in the process together. We are in the process of contact. We are getting ready for a huge reunion with our greater ancestors of men." "... All we need to do together is to reclaim our divinity," Gilliland said SAPA

[link to aliendigest.com]

Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 11/04/2012 12:51 PM
MuzzleBreak

User ID: 26950990
United States
11/04/2012 12:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
If the image is made from many smaller images, then every one of them should show a metal arm extending out from the rover to hold the camera. If NASA 'shopped those all out, there should be a statement to that effect, because they usually say when they've enhanced a shot.

So my question is, where is this statement?
 Quoting: Keep2theCode



^^^^THIS
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 836632


A shadow of the camera is visible on the closest front wheel. The arm itself would have moved to get the composite, and thus was edited out.
In his book, "Between Two Ages," Brzezinski wrote: "The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values."

MuzzleBreak
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 836632
United States
11/04/2012 12:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
If the image is made from many smaller images, then every one of them should show a metal arm extending out from the rover to hold the camera. If NASA 'shopped those all out, there should be a statement to that effect, because they usually say when they've enhanced a shot.

So my question is, where is this statement?
 Quoting: Keep2theCode


Correct. Every image taken of the source (rover) would show the arm that contains the camera.

Is this correct?
 Quoting: Not Anonymous Coward


The camera would:

A:have to be a remote camera
B: two separate cameras taking snaps with each camera retracted.

Since it didn't state that then something is up with this photo.

And I'm not a "we didnt go to the Moon" person.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8640456
United States
11/04/2012 12:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
Mars, earth, where ever that picture really is, it's a desolate shithole place.
Hales

User ID: 12354261
United States
11/04/2012 01:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
Maybe it's taking a picture off a reflection created by the side of one of those mirrored UFOs.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18366868
United States
11/04/2012 01:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
surprised to see so many "the earth is flat" people here.
Abi ~

User ID: 25045778
United States
11/04/2012 01:09 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
Could be just another govie scam..use the "rover on Mars" program to divert funds into something else...it's not like they have never done that before...they make up non existent programs all the time for funding to go to something else...things they do not want us to know...just sayin..this picture is very strange...and we all know we cannot trust the crumbs tptb want to throw us.. so......
You accept the love you think you deserve~~~

Love cannot live where there is no trust~~~

Truth has no temperature~~~
Swampgaslensflare from Venus
User ID: 26980231
Germany
11/04/2012 01:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
Maybe marsian swampgas could be a good explanation for this.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 836632
United States
11/04/2012 01:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
surprised to see so many "the earth is flat" people here.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18366868



Not at all, how does a camera take a picture of itself without a mirror? Without a remote camera or without two cameras being employed to have the entire rover shot? Regardless of how many photos it took to take the montage?
How?

????????????????????????????????
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3978737
United States
11/04/2012 01:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
Is that the color of the sky from mars? It looks like an overcast day in NYC.
Earth Daughter

User ID: 26255222
United States
11/04/2012 01:28 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
Mars1
 Quoting: G3


LOL Great pic.
"Arrows of hate have been shot at me too, but they never hit me, because somehow they belonged to another world, with which I have no connection whatsoever." - Albert Einstein
RD47
User ID: 25657951
United States
11/04/2012 01:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
Up next, Man has never flown, all flights have been staged by BAA and anybody claiming to have been on an 'airplane' is a government shill. The government made up planes as a cover story for shooting the twin towers with scud missiles.

True story.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26847342


SOUNDS ABOUT RIGHT TO ME. LOL

ana
RD47
User ID: 25657951
United States
11/04/2012 01:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
If you look at the lens you can see how it's flipped upside down... The dirt is on top. You can see where the rover pulled forward then backed up. It probably dropped off a camera then backed away. There are no footprints; all the prints have the same tread as the tracks on the rover. The only other marks on the left are probably where either samples were taken or where it originally sat the camera.
 Quoting: Hitokiri


And if you believe this, I got some bitching sea front land here in Scottsdale Arizona for sale.

anaana
Echo3012

User ID: 940400
United Kingdom
11/04/2012 07:45 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
I don't know much about space and space missions, but the name of the picture in wiki article kind of gives a hint. Still, hard to believe really.

[link to upload.wikimedia.org]
Sir France's Beercan

User ID: 26592095
United Kingdom
11/04/2012 07:49 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
Nevada is lovely at this time of year.
Keep2theCode

User ID: 20545539
United States
11/04/2012 07:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
I don't know much about space and space missions, but the name of the picture in wiki article kind of gives a hint. Still, hard to believe really.

[link to upload.wikimedia.org]
 Quoting: Echo3012


Yes, so where's the arm? There isn't one in the photo, and no excuses given so far explain it. If NASA 'shopped it out, they need to admit that they alter the images.

But they don't want to do that or they'd know we (well, at least some of us) wouldn't be able to trust any images from them at all. We could take their word that they only enhanced them or something, but what fool would accept that, from the agency fondly called "Never A Straight Answer"?
Have I now become your enemy by telling you the truth? (Gal. 4:16)
Echo3012

User ID: 940400
United Kingdom
11/04/2012 07:55 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
From Huffington Post article:

"The 1-ton Curiosity rover took 55 hi-res pictures with its Mars Hand Lens Imager camera, or MAHLI, on Oct. 31. Mission scientists then stitched the images together to create a full-color mosaic of Curiosity and its Gale Crater landing site."

[link to www.huffingtonpost.com]
Keep2theCode

User ID: 20545539
United States
11/04/2012 07:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
From Huffington Post article:

"The 1-ton Curiosity rover took 55 hi-res pictures with its Mars Hand Lens Imager camera, or MAHLI, on Oct. 31. Mission scientists then stitched the images together to create a full-color mosaic of Curiosity and its Gale Crater landing site."

[link to www.huffingtonpost.com]
 Quoting: Echo3012


Seen many such articles today. Downloaded the hi-res photo and examined it.

No arm.

They could have taken a bazillion one-pixel photos and the arm would still have to be visible.
Have I now become your enemy by telling you the truth? (Gal. 4:16)
Echo3012

User ID: 940400
United Kingdom
11/04/2012 08:13 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
Not trying to shill or anything, but why would the arm be still visible in the composition? As far as I'm concerned with technology available today this is not a massive challenge.
Keep2theCode

User ID: 20545539
United States
11/04/2012 08:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
Not trying to shill or anything, but why would the arm be still visible in the composition? As far as I'm concerned with technology available today this is not a massive challenge.
 Quoting: Echo3012


By technology, you'd have to have a self-propelled floating camera. I'm pretty sure not even NASA claims to have one of those up there.

Think about it: the camera is mounted somehow on the rover, on an extendable arm. Since the arm is attached to the rover, any photo of the entire rover, even if it was pieced together, MUST show the extendable arm, at least partially.

Now look at the space between the rover and wherever the camera is, and explain what the camera could possibly be sitting on. This is not a question of technology but of logic and physical equipment on a planet that supposedly is uninhabited, and where no other previous bots could take the shot.
Have I now become your enemy by telling you the truth? (Gal. 4:16)
Echo3012

User ID: 940400
United Kingdom
11/04/2012 08:36 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
Not trying to shill or anything, but why would the arm be still visible in the composition? As far as I'm concerned with technology available today this is not a massive challenge.
 Quoting: Echo3012


By technology, you'd have to have a self-propelled floating camera. I'm pretty sure not even NASA claims to have one of those up there.

Think about it: the camera is mounted somehow on the rover, on an extendable arm. Since the arm is attached to the rover, any photo of the entire rover, even if it was pieced together, MUST show the extendable arm, at least partially.

Now look at the space between the rover and wherever the camera is, and explain what the camera could possibly be sitting on. This is not a question of technology but of logic and physical equipment on a planet that supposedly is uninhabited, and where no other previous bots could take the shot.
 Quoting: Keep2theCode


I was looking for a picture for reference to try to understand how it actually could be done, I must say, I'm quite curious :)
Anyway, if you take a look at this picture:

[link to www.popularmechanics.com]

It shows that APXS and MAHLI are mounted on the 5-joint 7ft long robotic arm, which is not visible, but in the photo there is a grey "pole" sticking out from the place where the robotic arm apparently is, so maybe this pole is the 1st of 5 joints of the arm and the rest was shopped out. I may be completely wrong, but I'm pretty sure there are some CGI experts on this forum to find where (if) the photos had the arm visible.

Last Edited by Echo3012 on 11/04/2012 08:37 PM
Keep2theCode

User ID: 20545539
United States
11/04/2012 08:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
I was looking for a picture for reference to try to understand how it actually could be done, I must say, I'm quite curious :)
Anyway, if you take a look at this picture:

[link to www.popularmechanics.com]

It shows that APXS and MAHLI are mounted on the 5-joint 7ft long robotic arm, which is not visible, but in the photo there is a grey "pole" sticking out from the place where the robotic arm apparently is, so maybe this pole is the 1st of 5 joints of the arm and the rest was shopped out. I may be completely wrong, but I'm pretty sure there are some CGI experts on this forum to find where (if) the photos had the arm visible.
 Quoting: Echo3012


Thanks for the drawing. It shows exactly where the arm should be, and clearly it is not in the NASA photo.

If it was 'shopped out, NASA images cannot be trusted, period.

And what would be the point of NASA going to the trouble to seamlessly remove the arm? Isn't that part of the self-portrait? Why would they remove it and not say so, which only begs for criticism?

The possible choices, as I see it:
-- NASA images are fake
-- The rover isn't on Mars
-- Something or someone is on Mars and we weren't told about it, and that someone/thing took the photo
Have I now become your enemy by telling you the truth? (Gal. 4:16)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17938575
Canada
11/04/2012 08:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
Holy fuck, I despair for humanity..
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27010149
United States
11/04/2012 08:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
You people are nothing short of brain damage.

[link to www.huffingtonpost.com]

The 1-ton Curiosity rover took 55 hi-res pictures with its Mars Hand Lens Imager camera, or MAHLI, on Oct. 31. Mission scientists then stitched the images together to create a full-color mosaic of Curiosity and its Gale Crater landing site.


stfu :bigcruise:
 Quoting: Da fuq


I don't care how many pictures it stitched together. It's impossible. There would not be enough data because the camera on the arm could never succeed in capturing itself. It could rotate all around itself 360 degrees and never capture itself. The picture is a fake.

Double Dumb-Ass on you fucktard.
Echo3012

User ID: 940400
United Kingdom
11/04/2012 09:06 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
I was looking for a picture for reference to try to understand how it actually could be done, I must say, I'm quite curious :)
Anyway, if you take a look at this picture:

[link to www.popularmechanics.com]

It shows that APXS and MAHLI are mounted on the 5-joint 7ft long robotic arm, which is not visible, but in the photo there is a grey "pole" sticking out from the place where the robotic arm apparently is, so maybe this pole is the 1st of 5 joints of the arm and the rest was shopped out. I may be completely wrong, but I'm pretty sure there are some CGI experts on this forum to find where (if) the photos had the arm visible.
 Quoting: Echo3012


Thanks for the drawing. It shows exactly where the arm should be, and clearly it is not in the NASA photo.

If it was 'shopped out, NASA images cannot be trusted, period.

And what would be the point of NASA going to the trouble to seamlessly remove the arm? Isn't that part of the self-portrait? Why would they remove it and not say so, which only begs for criticism?

The possible choices, as I see it:
-- NASA images are fake
-- The rover isn't on Mars
-- Something or someone is on Mars and we weren't told about it, and that someone/thing took the photo
 Quoting: Keep2theCode


Well, it does say in the article that this is a composition made of 55 images. You wouldn't expect them just to overlay all the images and post it. That would sure look weird. Actually I'm starting to think that someone just made a rapid accusation without reading how it was done. I mean, you wouldn't just jump to conclusion that it's manipulated after reading that it was a composition, you'd probably think "man, that's some fine photoshop skills there".
Btw, anyone knows why they put cabling outside the rover rather than hidden inside? Just out of curiosity.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27010149
United States
11/04/2012 09:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
You people are nothing short of brain damage.

[link to www.huffingtonpost.com]

The 1-ton Curiosity rover took 55 hi-res pictures with its Mars Hand Lens Imager camera, or MAHLI, on Oct. 31. Mission scientists then stitched the images together to create a full-color mosaic of Curiosity and its Gale Crater landing site.


stfu :bigcruise:
 Quoting: Da fuq


I don't care how many pictures it stitched together. It's impossible. There would not be enough data because the camera on the arm could never succeed in capturing itself. It could rotate all around itself 360 degrees and never capture itself. The picture is a fake.

Double Dumb-Ass on you fucktard.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27010149


Or should I say the whole premise behind the picture is a fake. Someone took the damn picture, the Rover isn't not on Mars. It's on Earth. This is all bullshit. If we landed on the moon in 1969, there is no way in the world we wouldn't have gone back. It's been nearly a half-century since we allegedly went there. If we had gotten there successfully that long ago we would have had colonies on the moon right now, not just the USA either. Be bloody realistic. Once you leave this atmosphere you have the Van Allen radiation belt to contend with starting at 1000 KM going to 60,000 KM. It's highly irradiated. If our space program successfully got through it unharmed in 1969-72 then why has no one passed through it since?
Keep2theCode

User ID: 20545539
United States
11/04/2012 09:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHO THE F*** TOOK THIS PHOTO? **WTF** - Curiosity Rover Snaps Stunning Self-Portrait on Red Planet
I was looking for a picture for reference to try to understand how it actually could be done, I must say, I'm quite curious :)
Anyway, if you take a look at this picture:

[link to www.popularmechanics.com]

It shows that APXS and MAHLI are mounted on the 5-joint 7ft long robotic arm, which is not visible, but in the photo there is a grey "pole" sticking out from the place where the robotic arm apparently is, so maybe this pole is the 1st of 5 joints of the arm and the rest was shopped out. I may be completely wrong, but I'm pretty sure there are some CGI experts on this forum to find where (if) the photos had the arm visible.
 Quoting: Echo3012


Thanks for the drawing. It shows exactly where the arm should be, and clearly it is not in the NASA photo.

If it was 'shopped out, NASA images cannot be trusted, period.

And what would be the point of NASA going to the trouble to seamlessly remove the arm? Isn't that part of the self-portrait? Why would they remove it and not say so, which only begs for criticism?

The possible choices, as I see it:
-- NASA images are fake
-- The rover isn't on Mars
-- Something or someone is on Mars and we weren't told about it, and that someone/thing took the photo
 Quoting: Keep2theCode


Well, it does say in the article that this is a composition made of 55 images. You wouldn't expect them just to overlay all the images and post it. That would sure look weird. Actually I'm starting to think that someone just made a rapid accusation without reading how it was done. I mean, you wouldn't just jump to conclusion that it's manipulated after reading that it was a composition, you'd probably think "man, that's some fine photoshop skills there".
Btw, anyone knows why they put cabling outside the rover rather than hidden inside? Just out of curiosity.
 Quoting: Echo3012


I have run out of ways to say "It doesn't matter HOW MANY IMAGES make up the whole". The number is irrelevant. It doesn't matter. It's beside the point.

The point is that the ARM is MISSING.

There are no words...
Have I now become your enemy by telling you the truth? (Gal. 4:16)

News