Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,046 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 148,322
Pageviews Today: 253,446Threads Today: 85Posts Today: 1,671
03:22 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Why is there a Constitutional Ammendment on the ballot in Kentucky which states it is a citizen's right to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife?
Poster Handle Mycelium
Post Content
I don't hunt or fish, but I am an herbal wildcrafter. Would the harvest of wild plants fall under such a law? It generally falls under "wildlife," right?

As the law goes, I need a permit to harvest anything over 200 dollars worth from a Nat'l forest (federal land), but none on private land beyond landowner's consent. Nowhere can I harvest endangered or federally protected plants, and in AZ, for instance, I cannot harvest prickly pear, though it is under no stress and couldn't be eliminated if you tried. Point is, some cases make sense, others don't. I can see the clause in question from both sides...
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP