The New York Times, the Washington Post and other so-called "liberal" newspapers are actually more fascist than they are liberal. According to the definitions I found on dictionary.com, liberal means "favorable to progress or reform; favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom; free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant; open-minded; and not bound by conventional ideas." Why anyone would not want to be associated with those qualities is beyond me. On the other hand, fascism is defined as "a system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism." Why would someone who advocated maximum individual freedom support a system that suppresses individual freedom -- especially the right to dissent and to think for yourself? People who support fascism of the kind practiced by Bush, Obama, Hitler and Mussolini may be many things, but they are not liberals. There hasn't been a truly liberal president in this country since President Kennedy was assassinated by the Freemasons and the CIA in 1963. He was trying to save us all from fascism, and that's why he was killed.