Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,562 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,785,732
Pageviews Today: 2,362,903Threads Today: 459Posts Today: 9,945
03:48 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject I think I know that the 2nd Christ is here on Earth in the flesh. Lets talk about it.
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
...


then explain to me 666 and how it differs from 777,do you know the distinction between the two?
 Quoting: Mi'Kmaq
666= flesh/creation(s) and created concepts of division that lead away from our spirit...777= our co-creator spirit we all share and knowledge that leads us inward to our shared spirit...as its written, a house divided cannot stand...those aren't shits and giggles in my/our 777 thread...
 Quoting: T Ceti H.C. Radnarg


you have not sufficiently answered the question,so I will correct you:666 is the number of all men,who have not recieved the holy spirit ,and are there fore incomplete,if and when the spirit comes to a person worthy of it and stays,then that person is concidered 777,whole ,anointed,the christ,ect....
 Quoting: Mi'Kmaq
roflmao,what holds up the flesh,sticks and mortar? that was the spirit speaking through that flesh named Jesus...he didn't have a different spirit from anyone else who lives and breaths and moves and talks...only one spirit can give live to a body...you mind telling what other spirit can do that? a god is incomplete because if a god was perfect,then humility wound not exist in that god and then that god would still be incomplete it humility didn't exist in a god...<proves a god is not perfect because god is a concept...even the spirit isn't perfect or it would not have any humility...there's no such thing as perfection...
 Quoting: T Ceti H.C. Radnarg



"he didn't have a different spirit from anyone else who lives and breaths and moves and talk" are you talking about the Holy Ghost?

"a god is incomplete because..." you start by saying that "that God is, must be, or must have..." None of those even apply, unless they are stated by the system of belief itself within the system of belief.
You cant really argument outside of it either using "human thinking". "Natural Law", "Categoric Imperatives", "Aristotelic Rethoric".

The logic structure utilized on the Bible is way more advanced than anything we have "developed" during all our history for someone to come and attempt to bypass it with their own system of belief. Doesnt work that way.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:



News