We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today. | |
| Sleeping Giant Haste The Day User ID: 543618 11/06/2012 09:36 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I had never heard of him, aside from glp. He just ruined his career, though. Last Edited by Sleeping Giant on 11/06/2012 09:36 AM "You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." ~C.S. Lewis "And Lord, haste the day when my faith shall be sight, The clouds be rolled back as a scroll; The trump shall resound, and the Lord shall descend, Even so, it is well with my soul." Thread: 37 Survival Downloads and Handbooks – Pioneering, SHTF, Engineering, Urban Gardening, Defense, and More |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27123228 11/06/2012 09:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 26976120 11/06/2012 09:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The New York Times' toadie wunderkind's "14%" chance of a Romney victory is so laughably overzealous, so utterly delusional, we can rest assured the libtards have overplayed their hand. Quoting: Super Bowl Dave The ridiculous oversampling of Democrats through this campaign in every poll under the sun should be the sort of harbinger that gives libs a chill down their legs -- instead, they're drowning in their own Kool-Aid. One CNN poll oversampled Democrats +10 and yet showed a Romney and Obama TIE. Gallup and Rasmussen samplings of voter ID/affiliation shows a huge shift back to Republicans, with either a tie or R+1 to R+3 in today's electorate. This is a huge shift from 2008. When the incumbent comes in under 50% in a dead heat, advanage: the challenger. Advantage, Romney. Gamblers are about to lose their shirts, big time -- is that anything new? Or are gamblers always right? Which one are you willing to bet on? GOPTards like yourself always cry foul when any expert, long standing professional, or otherwise rock solid witness says anything good about your political foes. Like clockwork, you cry and moan, the only time you ever give any data a fair look is when it heavily favors your team. What a joke, the GOP has about as much substance these day as a bag of hot air. |
| Sleeping Giant Haste The Day User ID: 543618 11/06/2012 09:40 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The New York Times' toadie wunderkind's "14%" chance of a Romney victory is so laughably overzealous, so utterly delusional, we can rest assured the libtards have overplayed their hand. Quoting: Super Bowl Dave The ridiculous oversampling of Democrats through this campaign in every poll under the sun should be the sort of harbinger that gives libs a chill down their legs -- instead, they're drowning in their own Kool-Aid. One CNN poll oversampled Democrats +10 and yet showed a Romney and Obama TIE. Gallup and Rasmussen samplings of voter ID/affiliation shows a huge shift back to Republicans, with either a tie or R+1 to R+3 in today's electorate. This is a huge shift from 2008. When the incumbent comes in under 50% in a dead heat, advanage: the challenger. Advantage, Romney. Gamblers are about to lose their shirts, big time -- is that anything new? Or are gamblers always right? Which one are you willing to bet on? GOPTards like yourself always cry foul when any expert, long standing professional, or otherwise rock solid witness says anything good about your political foes. Like clockwork, you cry and moan, the only time you ever give any data a fair look is when it heavily favors your team. What a joke, the GOP has about as much substance these day as a bag of hot air. It's Bush's fault!! "You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." ~C.S. Lewis "And Lord, haste the day when my faith shall be sight, The clouds be rolled back as a scroll; The trump shall resound, and the Lord shall descend, Even so, it is well with my soul." Thread: 37 Survival Downloads and Handbooks – Pioneering, SHTF, Engineering, Urban Gardening, Defense, and More |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 7061022 11/06/2012 09:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Super Bowl Dave (OP) User ID: 14634326 11/06/2012 09:41 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "While every single poll on the planet predicts Democrats will enjoy a turnout advantage of three to eleven points, the latest Rasmussen survey of party affiliation taken throughout October shows that Republicans enjoy a huge 5.8% Party ID advantage going into the 2012 election." [link to www.breitbart.com] |
| berniemom2012 heyjafreyja User ID: 6493463 11/06/2012 09:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The New York Times' toadie wunderkind's "14%" chance of a Romney victory is so laughably overzealous, so utterly delusional, we can rest assured the libtards have overplayed their hand. Quoting: Super Bowl Dave The ridiculous oversampling of Democrats through this campaign in every poll under the sun should be the sort of harbinger that gives libs a chill down their legs -- instead, they're drowning in their own Kool-Aid. One CNN poll oversampled Democrats +10 and yet showed a Romney and Obama TIE. Gallup and Rasmussen samplings of voter ID/affiliation shows a huge shift back to Republicans, with either a tie or R+1 to R+3 in today's electorate. This is a huge shift from 2008. When the incumbent comes in under 50% in a dead heat, advanage: the challenger. Advantage, Romney. Gamblers are about to lose their shirts, big time -- is that anything new? Or are gamblers always right? Which one are you willing to bet on? And he's got an unctious golden-boy-mommy-says-I-can-do-no-wrong facial expression, to boot, in every photo I've seen. Can't wait to see him become yesterday's news. Every one of your points is good. And I'll add a couple. Assuming that Democrats will vote for Obama is uninformed at best, arrogant at worst. I'm one who will be voting for Romney, and I personally know several more. If me and my friends are representative at all, it's gonna be an RR landslide. My mouth to God's ear. :) |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27123150 11/06/2012 09:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "While every single poll on the planet predicts Democrats will enjoy a turnout advantage of three to eleven points, the latest Rasmussen survey of party affiliation taken throughout October shows that Republicans enjoy a huge 5.8% Party ID advantage going into the 2012 election." Quoting: Super Bowl Dave [link to www.breitbart.com] Breitbart has been full of fail for years, and you still go there. Just sayin |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 7061022 11/06/2012 09:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The New York Times' toadie wunderkind's "14%" chance of a Romney victory is so laughably overzealous, so utterly delusional, we can rest assured the libtards have overplayed their hand. Quoting: Super Bowl Dave The ridiculous oversampling of Democrats through this campaign in every poll under the sun should be the sort of harbinger that gives libs a chill down their legs -- instead, they're drowning in their own Kool-Aid. One CNN poll oversampled Democrats +10 and yet showed a Romney and Obama TIE. Gallup and Rasmussen samplings of voter ID/affiliation shows a huge shift back to Republicans, with either a tie or R+1 to R+3 in today's electorate. This is a huge shift from 2008. When the incumbent comes in under 50% in a dead heat, advanage: the challenger. Advantage, Romney. Gamblers are about to lose their shirts, big time -- is that anything new? Or are gamblers always right? Which one are you willing to bet on? GOPTards like yourself always cry foul when any expert, long standing professional, or otherwise rock solid witness says anything good about your political foes. Like clockwork, you cry and moan, the only time you ever give any data a fair look is when it heavily favors your team. What a joke, the GOP has about as much substance these day as a bag of hot air. It's Bush's fault!! Well he did set a dangerous precedence by overruling states rights to stop the Florida recount |
| Super Bowl Dave (OP) User ID: 14634326 11/06/2012 09:42 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | GOPTards like yourself always cry foul when any expert, long standing professional, or otherwise rock solid witness says anything good about your political foes. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26976120 Nate Silver has projected TWO elections before this, 2010 and 2008. I'll listen to the guys who've been doing this for decades, like Barone. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 14317225 11/06/2012 09:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 26976120 11/06/2012 09:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "While every single poll on the planet predicts Democrats will enjoy a turnout advantage of three to eleven points, the latest Rasmussen survey of party affiliation taken throughout October shows that Republicans enjoy a huge 5.8% Party ID advantage going into the 2012 election." Quoting: Super Bowl Dave [link to www.breitbart.com] You are reading an opinion piece from Breitbart.com IN fact the only site you GOPTards have been linking all day has been Breitbart....I thought people here were supposed to be at least mildly aware of what they are reading. FInd a non-Super-Partisan news source that correlates any of what these useless Op-Ed tear filled blogs purport to be true. People with brains know you have nothing but fantasy. Prepare to be heartbroken, when you wake up and realize that you live in a very air tight bubble. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 10372472 11/06/2012 09:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think hurricane sand and Chris Christie confirmed Obama for re election, this event is not in the polls Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7061022 Romney being anti FEMA is not good in the middle of a disaster Interesting, as there was a story going around quoting a Karl Rove staffer saying that Rove was already working on spin for a story when Romney ultimately loses today. Rove's strategy is to deny that Obama won fairly because of Sandy providing a platform for Obama to gain more air time and leadership cred. As for Romney being anti-FEMA? Is he or isn't he. He seems to have flipped on that platform as well recently, and he will not answer questions regarding his view about FEMA. Watch Romney dodge the question 14 times here: |
| Super Bowl Dave (OP) User ID: 14634326 11/06/2012 09:55 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think hurricane sand and Chris Christie confirmed Obama for re election, this event is not in the polls Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7061022 Romney being anti FEMA is not good in the middle of a disaster Interesting, as there was a story going around quoting a Karl Rove staffer saying that Rove was already working on spin for a story when Romney ultimately loses today. Rove's strategy is to deny that Obama won fairly because of Sandy providing a platform for Obama to gain more air time and leadership cred. As for Romney being anti-FEMA? Is he or isn't he. He seems to have flipped on that platform as well recently, and he will not answer questions regarding his view about FEMA. Watch Romney dodge the question 14 times here: I'm familiar with the Rove thing. Instead of Rove throwing everything under the bus, he ought to be bringing to light how Obama used Sandy for a photo-op and left the East Coast left for dead to go campaign. People see that it's quickly becoming Katrina 2.0. You think that is favorable for Obama? Last Edited by Super Bowl Dave on 11/06/2012 09:56 AM |
| Super Bowl Dave (OP) User ID: 14634326 11/06/2012 12:58 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Super Bowl Dave (OP) User ID: 14634326 11/06/2012 02:52 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 4042505 11/06/2012 11:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 9425489 11/06/2012 11:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The New York Times' toadie wunderkind's "14%" chance of a Romney victory is so laughably overzealous, so utterly delusional, we can rest assured the libtards have overplayed their hand. Quoting: Super Bowl Dave The ridiculous oversampling of Democrats through this campaign in every poll under the sun should be the sort of harbinger that gives libs a chill down their legs -- instead, they're drowning in their own Kool-Aid. One CNN poll oversampled Democrats +10 and yet showed a Romney and Obama TIE. Gallup and Rasmussen samplings of voter ID/affiliation shows a huge shift back to Republicans, with either a tie or R+1 to R+3 in today's electorate. This is a huge shift from 2008. When the incumbent comes in under 50% in a dead heat, advanage: the challenger. Advantage, Romney. Gamblers are about to lose their shirts, big time -- is that anything new? Or are gamblers always right? Which one are you willing to bet on? lulz @ the tard. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 26579062 11/06/2012 11:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 26826426 11/06/2012 11:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 26579062 11/06/2012 11:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27210708 11/07/2012 05:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27164770 11/07/2012 05:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27211426 11/07/2012 06:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27243518 11/07/2012 02:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Super Bowl Dave (OP) User ID: 14634326 11/07/2012 02:29 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27688150 11/13/2012 05:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28032567 11/18/2012 07:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |