Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,857 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,285,017
Pageviews Today: 2,312,057Threads Today: 998Posts Today: 16,846
07:57 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.

 
Super Bowl Dave

User ID: 14634326
United States
11/06/2012 09:34 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
The New York Times' toadie wunderkind's "14%" chance of a Romney victory is so laughably overzealous, so utterly delusional, we can rest assured the libtards have overplayed their hand.

The ridiculous oversampling of Democrats through this campaign in every poll under the sun should be the sort of harbinger that gives libs a chill down their legs -- instead, they're drowning in their own Kool-Aid.

One CNN poll oversampled Democrats +10 and yet showed a Romney and Obama TIE.

Gallup and Rasmussen samplings of voter ID/affiliation shows a huge shift back to Republicans, with either a tie or R+1 to R+3 in today's electorate. This is a huge shift from 2008.

When the incumbent comes in under 50% in a dead heat, advanage: the challenger. Advantage, Romney.

Gamblers are about to lose their shirts, big time -- is that anything new? Or are gamblers always right? Which one are you willing to bet on?

Last Edited by Super Bowl Dave on 11/06/2012 09:37 AM
The Long Island Medium Is A Fake!

[link to www.longislandmediumfake.com]
Sleeping Giant
Haste The Day

User ID: 543618
United States
11/06/2012 09:36 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
I had never heard of him, aside from glp. He just ruined his career, though.

Last Edited by Sleeping Giant on 11/06/2012 09:36 AM
"You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." ~C.S. Lewis

"And Lord, haste the day when my faith shall be sight, The clouds be rolled back as a scroll; The trump shall resound, and the Lord shall descend, Even so, it is well with my soul."

Thread: 37 Survival Downloads and Handbooks – Pioneering, SHTF, Engineering, Urban Gardening, Defense, and More
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27123228
United States
11/06/2012 09:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
We shall see. chuckle
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 26976120
Hong Kong
11/06/2012 09:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
The New York Times' toadie wunderkind's "14%" chance of a Romney victory is so laughably overzealous, so utterly delusional, we can rest assured the libtards have overplayed their hand.

The ridiculous oversampling of Democrats through this campaign in every poll under the sun should be the sort of harbinger that gives libs a chill down their legs -- instead, they're drowning in their own Kool-Aid.

One CNN poll oversampled Democrats +10 and yet showed a Romney and Obama TIE.

Gallup and Rasmussen samplings of voter ID/affiliation shows a huge shift back to Republicans, with either a tie or R+1 to R+3 in today's electorate. This is a huge shift from 2008.

When the incumbent comes in under 50% in a dead heat, advanage: the challenger. Advantage, Romney.

Gamblers are about to lose their shirts, big time -- is that anything new? Or are gamblers always right? Which one are you willing to bet on?
 Quoting: Super Bowl Dave


GOPTards like yourself always cry foul when any expert, long standing professional, or otherwise rock solid witness says anything good about your political foes.

Like clockwork, you cry and moan, the only time you ever give any data a fair look is when it heavily favors your team.

What a joke, the GOP has about as much substance these day as a bag of hot air.
Sleeping Giant
Haste The Day

User ID: 543618
United States
11/06/2012 09:40 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
The New York Times' toadie wunderkind's "14%" chance of a Romney victory is so laughably overzealous, so utterly delusional, we can rest assured the libtards have overplayed their hand.

The ridiculous oversampling of Democrats through this campaign in every poll under the sun should be the sort of harbinger that gives libs a chill down their legs -- instead, they're drowning in their own Kool-Aid.

One CNN poll oversampled Democrats +10 and yet showed a Romney and Obama TIE.

Gallup and Rasmussen samplings of voter ID/affiliation shows a huge shift back to Republicans, with either a tie or R+1 to R+3 in today's electorate. This is a huge shift from 2008.

When the incumbent comes in under 50% in a dead heat, advanage: the challenger. Advantage, Romney.

Gamblers are about to lose their shirts, big time -- is that anything new? Or are gamblers always right? Which one are you willing to bet on?
 Quoting: Super Bowl Dave


GOPTards like yourself always cry foul when any expert, long standing professional, or otherwise rock solid witness says anything good about your political foes.

Like clockwork, you cry and moan, the only time you ever give any data a fair look is when it heavily favors your team.

What a joke, the GOP has about as much substance these day as a bag of hot air.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26976120


It's Bush's fault!!
"You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." ~C.S. Lewis

"And Lord, haste the day when my faith shall be sight, The clouds be rolled back as a scroll; The trump shall resound, and the Lord shall descend, Even so, it is well with my soul."

Thread: 37 Survival Downloads and Handbooks – Pioneering, SHTF, Engineering, Urban Gardening, Defense, and More
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7061022
United States
11/06/2012 09:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
I think hurricane sand and Chris Christie confirmed Obama for re election, this event is not in the polls

Romney being anti FEMA is not good in the middle of a disaster
Super Bowl Dave (OP)

User ID: 14634326
United States
11/06/2012 09:41 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
"While every single poll on the planet predicts Democrats will enjoy a turnout advantage of three to eleven points, the latest Rasmussen survey of party affiliation taken throughout October shows that Republicans enjoy a huge 5.8% Party ID advantage going into the 2012 election."

[link to www.breitbart.com]
The Long Island Medium Is A Fake!

[link to www.longislandmediumfake.com]
berniemom2012
heyjafreyja

User ID: 6493463
United States
11/06/2012 09:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
The New York Times' toadie wunderkind's "14%" chance of a Romney victory is so laughably overzealous, so utterly delusional, we can rest assured the libtards have overplayed their hand.

The ridiculous oversampling of Democrats through this campaign in every poll under the sun should be the sort of harbinger that gives libs a chill down their legs -- instead, they're drowning in their own Kool-Aid.

One CNN poll oversampled Democrats +10 and yet showed a Romney and Obama TIE.

Gallup and Rasmussen samplings of voter ID/affiliation shows a huge shift back to Republicans, with either a tie or R+1 to R+3 in today's electorate. This is a huge shift from 2008.

When the incumbent comes in under 50% in a dead heat, advanage: the challenger. Advantage, Romney.

Gamblers are about to lose their shirts, big time -- is that anything new? Or are gamblers always right? Which one are you willing to bet on?
 Quoting: Super Bowl Dave


And he's got an unctious golden-boy-mommy-says-I-can-do-no-wrong facial expression, to boot, in every photo I've seen. Can't wait to see him become yesterday's news.

Every one of your points is good. And I'll add a couple.

Assuming that Democrats will vote for Obama is uninformed at best, arrogant at worst. I'm one who will be voting for Romney, and I personally know several more. If me and my friends are representative at all, it's gonna be an RR landslide.

My mouth to God's ear. :)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27123150
United States
11/06/2012 09:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
"While every single poll on the planet predicts Democrats will enjoy a turnout advantage of three to eleven points, the latest Rasmussen survey of party affiliation taken throughout October shows that Republicans enjoy a huge 5.8% Party ID advantage going into the 2012 election."

[link to www.breitbart.com]
 Quoting: Super Bowl Dave


Breitbart has been full of fail for years, and you still go there.

Just sayin
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7061022
United States
11/06/2012 09:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
The New York Times' toadie wunderkind's "14%" chance of a Romney victory is so laughably overzealous, so utterly delusional, we can rest assured the libtards have overplayed their hand.

The ridiculous oversampling of Democrats through this campaign in every poll under the sun should be the sort of harbinger that gives libs a chill down their legs -- instead, they're drowning in their own Kool-Aid.

One CNN poll oversampled Democrats +10 and yet showed a Romney and Obama TIE.

Gallup and Rasmussen samplings of voter ID/affiliation shows a huge shift back to Republicans, with either a tie or R+1 to R+3 in today's electorate. This is a huge shift from 2008.

When the incumbent comes in under 50% in a dead heat, advanage: the challenger. Advantage, Romney.

Gamblers are about to lose their shirts, big time -- is that anything new? Or are gamblers always right? Which one are you willing to bet on?
 Quoting: Super Bowl Dave


GOPTards like yourself always cry foul when any expert, long standing professional, or otherwise rock solid witness says anything good about your political foes.

Like clockwork, you cry and moan, the only time you ever give any data a fair look is when it heavily favors your team.

What a joke, the GOP has about as much substance these day as a bag of hot air.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26976120


It's Bush's fault!!
 Quoting: Sleeping Giant


Well he did set a dangerous precedence by overruling states rights to stop the Florida recount
Super Bowl Dave (OP)

User ID: 14634326
United States
11/06/2012 09:42 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
GOPTards like yourself always cry foul when any expert, long standing professional, or otherwise rock solid witness says anything good about your political foes.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26976120


Nate Silver has projected TWO elections before this, 2010 and 2008.

I'll listen to the guys who've been doing this for decades, like Barone.
The Long Island Medium Is A Fake!

[link to www.longislandmediumfake.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14317225
United Kingdom
11/06/2012 09:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
He's not the only statistician to go with Obama.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 26976120
Hong Kong
11/06/2012 09:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
"While every single poll on the planet predicts Democrats will enjoy a turnout advantage of three to eleven points, the latest Rasmussen survey of party affiliation taken throughout October shows that Republicans enjoy a huge 5.8% Party ID advantage going into the 2012 election."

[link to www.breitbart.com]
 Quoting: Super Bowl Dave


You are reading an opinion piece from Breitbart.com

IN fact the only site you GOPTards have been linking all day has been Breitbart....I thought people here were supposed to be at least mildly aware of what they are reading.

FInd a non-Super-Partisan news source that correlates any of what these useless Op-Ed tear filled blogs purport to be true.

People with brains know you have nothing but fantasy.

Prepare to be heartbroken, when you wake up and realize that you live in a very air tight bubble.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10372472
Thailand
11/06/2012 09:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
I think hurricane sand and Chris Christie confirmed Obama for re election, this event is not in the polls

Romney being anti FEMA is not good in the middle of a disaster
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7061022


Interesting, as there was a story going around quoting a Karl Rove staffer saying that Rove was already working on spin for a story when Romney ultimately loses today. Rove's strategy is to deny that Obama won fairly because of Sandy providing a platform for Obama to gain more air time and leadership cred.

As for Romney being anti-FEMA? Is he or isn't he. He seems to have flipped on that platform as well recently, and he will not answer questions regarding his view about FEMA.

Watch Romney dodge the question 14 times here:

Super Bowl Dave (OP)

User ID: 14634326
United States
11/06/2012 09:55 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
I think hurricane sand and Chris Christie confirmed Obama for re election, this event is not in the polls

Romney being anti FEMA is not good in the middle of a disaster
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7061022


Interesting, as there was a story going around quoting a Karl Rove staffer saying that Rove was already working on spin for a story when Romney ultimately loses today. Rove's strategy is to deny that Obama won fairly because of Sandy providing a platform for Obama to gain more air time and leadership cred.

As for Romney being anti-FEMA? Is he or isn't he. He seems to have flipped on that platform as well recently, and he will not answer questions regarding his view about FEMA.

Watch Romney dodge the question 14 times here:


 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10372472


I'm familiar with the Rove thing. Instead of Rove throwing everything under the bus, he ought to be bringing to light how Obama used Sandy for a photo-op and left the East Coast left for dead to go campaign.

People see that it's quickly becoming Katrina 2.0. You think that is favorable for Obama?

Last Edited by Super Bowl Dave on 11/06/2012 09:56 AM
The Long Island Medium Is A Fake!

[link to www.longislandmediumfake.com]
Super Bowl Dave (OP)

User ID: 14634326
United States
11/06/2012 12:58 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
dd3333
The Long Island Medium Is A Fake!

[link to www.longislandmediumfake.com]
Super Bowl Dave (OP)

User ID: 14634326
United States
11/06/2012 02:52 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
bump
The Long Island Medium Is A Fake!

[link to www.longislandmediumfake.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4042505
United States
11/06/2012 11:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
uh. silver called it dude.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9425489
United States
11/06/2012 11:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
The New York Times' toadie wunderkind's "14%" chance of a Romney victory is so laughably overzealous, so utterly delusional, we can rest assured the libtards have overplayed their hand.

The ridiculous oversampling of Democrats through this campaign in every poll under the sun should be the sort of harbinger that gives libs a chill down their legs -- instead, they're drowning in their own Kool-Aid.

One CNN poll oversampled Democrats +10 and yet showed a Romney and Obama TIE.

Gallup and Rasmussen samplings of voter ID/affiliation shows a huge shift back to Republicans, with either a tie or R+1 to R+3 in today's electorate. This is a huge shift from 2008.

When the incumbent comes in under 50% in a dead heat, advanage: the challenger. Advantage, Romney.

Gamblers are about to lose their shirts, big time -- is that anything new? Or are gamblers always right? Which one are you willing to bet on?
 Quoting: Super Bowl Dave


lulz @ the tard.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 26579062
United States
11/06/2012 11:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
lmaobump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 26826426
United States
11/06/2012 11:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
I thought you were busy packing your bags for the trip to Guatamala fatass
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 26579062
United States
11/06/2012 11:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
hey where's that troll butthole provedademoncrap???

disappeared again like every year??? lmao
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27210708
Thailand
11/07/2012 05:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
Nate told you so, bubbas. LOL

That's two presidential elections in a row that he predicted correctly. Bet we will be hearing more from him four years from now.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27164770
United States
11/07/2012 05:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
bump
 Quoting: Super Bowl Dave


Guess you should have stuck with Paul you dumb ass.

Big supporter right?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27211426
New Zealand
11/07/2012 06:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
LMMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27243518
United States
11/07/2012 02:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
What do you have to say now, Super Butthead Dave??

Why are you always so WRONG?

What is the matter with your brain?
Super Bowl Dave (OP)

User ID: 14634326
United States
11/07/2012 02:29 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
jh555gag
The Long Island Medium Is A Fake!

[link to www.longislandmediumfake.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27688150
United States
11/13/2012 05:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
Nate Silver FTW!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28032567
United States
11/18/2012 07:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: We will never hear NATE SILVER'S name again after today.
Nate Silver FTW!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27688150


5a