Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,337 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,181,126
Pageviews Today: 1,972,463Threads Today: 814Posts Today: 14,114
07:01 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16973401
United States
11/06/2012 02:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
Whatever the reason they disappeared (left the planet with all the tech that wasn't immovable while leaving behind some people as an experiment...or wiped out by a catastrophe so complete that only the truly megalithic structures and small pockets of survivors remained), the civilization that appeared after them was much less technologically proficient.

For thousands of years each successive civilization (in the video below it's clear that the culture responsible for megalithic structures in Peru rose and fell prior to the Wari culture which preceded the Inca) gradually declined in technological prowess as the remaining knowledge from the megalithic builders slowly eroded. It's only been a relatively short time since tech advancement has been going forward instead of backward.



We're probably damn close to the level that this "Megaculture" had attained.

If so, it brings up a few possibly important questions.

1) If the Megaculture were Humans that were almost completely wiped out by a catastrophe, how long did it take them to reach the level of tech that they had before their demise (measuring from their lowest level to their end)?

2) Is it logical to assume that, from a similar starting point, post-Megaculture tech would, on a worldwide, overall basis, most likely advance at the same rate as Megaculture tech did from its low point?

3) And, understanding the cyclical nature of the Universe, how likely is it that the time from population decimation and abrupt end of peak tech due to natural catastrophe is a regular cycle?

4) Is it possible that Human level of tech achievement can be used as a signpost marking a cyclical cataclysm on Earth?

Just wondering.
Ozi Dude

User ID: 27144416
Australia
11/06/2012 02:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
We are not who we think we are soon the truth will be revealed to all. Be patient. it is coming.
goodmockingbird

User ID: 11364251
United States
11/06/2012 03:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
Interesting topic. 5 star thread.

Humbling to think how much we "don't know", compared to how much we "know" about the megalithic era.
I Support Our First Responders
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 26814306
United States
11/06/2012 03:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
The stone he is referring to is actually quite easy to work.

Whatever the reason they disappeared (left the planet with all the tech that wasn't immovable while leaving behind some people as an experiment...or wiped out by a catastrophe so complete that only the truly megalithic structures and small pockets of survivors remained), the civilization that appeared after them was much less technologically proficient.

For thousands of years each successive civilization (in the video below it's clear that the culture responsible for megalithic structures in Peru rose and fell prior to the Wari culture which preceded the Inca) gradually declined in technological prowess as the remaining knowledge from the megalithic builders slowly eroded. It's only been a relatively short time since tech advancement has been going forward instead of backward.



We're probably damn close to the level that this "Megaculture" had attained.

If so, it brings up a few possibly important questions.

1) If the Megaculture were Humans that were almost completely wiped out by a catastrophe, how long did it take them to reach the level of tech that they had before their demise (measuring from their lowest level to their end)?

2) Is it logical to assume that, from a similar starting point, post-Megaculture tech would, on a worldwide, overall basis, most likely advance at the same rate as Megaculture tech did from its low point?

3) And, understanding the cyclical nature of the Universe, how likely is it that the time from population decimation and abrupt end of peak tech due to natural catastrophe is a regular cycle?

4) Is it possible that Human level of tech achievement can be used as a signpost marking a cyclical cataclysm on Earth?

Just wondering.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16973401
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 16973401
United States
11/06/2012 03:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
Interesting topic. 5 star thread.

Humbling to think how much we "don't know", compared to how much we "know" about the megalithic era.
 Quoting: goodmockingbird


Thanks.

The Megaculture definitely could do some things we can't do today.
But it's a good bet we do some things today that they couldn't do.

And there's probably a lot of instances where both achieved the same results using different approaches and methods.

If there is a cyclical event that stops every rise in tech advancement, I'd say we're getting close. The Mayan Calendar and other harbingers of cyclical "doom" like Timewave Zero and some biblical stuff and ancient Egyptian stuff...etc keep looking more plausible with all the other social, planetary, solar, and galactic events getting weirder and weirder at an accelerating pace.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 16973401
United States
11/06/2012 03:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
The stone he is referring to is actually quite easy to work.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26814306


But the point is that the work becomes less sophisticated from that culture to the next and from that one to the next and so on...for thousands of years.

And that those oldest blocks were cut to build the same way these truly megalithic structure builders did worldwide.

The ease with which the stone can be worked and the actual work done with the stones are two entirely different things.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 16973401
United States
11/06/2012 03:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
And the further point is that this Megaculture completely disappeared....worldwide, except for the monumental structures they built....worldwide.
Joker

User ID: 1437768
United States
11/06/2012 04:05 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
The stone he is referring to is actually quite easy to work.

Whatever the reason they disappeared (left the planet with all the tech that wasn't immovable while leaving behind some people as an experiment...or wiped out by a catastrophe so complete that only the truly megalithic structures and small pockets of survivors remained), the civilization that appeared after them was much less technologically proficient.

For thousands of years each successive civilization (in the video below it's clear that the culture responsible for megalithic structures in Peru rose and fell prior to the Wari culture which preceded the Inca) gradually declined in technological prowess as the remaining knowledge from the megalithic builders slowly eroded. It's only been a relatively short time since tech advancement has been going forward instead of backward.



We're probably damn close to the level that this "Megaculture" had attained.

If so, it brings up a few possibly important questions.

1) If the Megaculture were Humans that were almost completely wiped out by a catastrophe, how long did it take them to reach the level of tech that they had before their demise (measuring from their lowest level to their end)?

2) Is it logical to assume that, from a similar starting point, post-Megaculture tech would, on a worldwide, overall basis, most likely advance at the same rate as Megaculture tech did from its low point?

3) And, understanding the cyclical nature of the Universe, how likely is it that the time from population decimation and abrupt end of peak tech due to natural catastrophe is a regular cycle?

4) Is it possible that Human level of tech achievement can be used as a signpost marking a cyclical cataclysm on Earth?

Just wondering.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16973401

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26814306


So explain this stone.
Joker

User ID: 1437768
United States
11/06/2012 04:06 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
5 stars Op thanks!! hf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13039567
United States
11/06/2012 04:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
And the further point is that this Megaculture completely disappeared....worldwide, except for the monumental structures they built....worldwide.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16973401


Pre-flood Bible folk... seriously
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23182389
United States
11/06/2012 04:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
The stone he is referring to is actually quite easy to work.

Whatever the reason they disappeared (left the planet with all the tech that wasn't immovable while leaving behind some people as an experiment...or wiped out by a catastrophe so complete that only the truly megalithic structures and small pockets of survivors remained), the civilization that appeared after them was much less technologically proficient.

For thousands of years each successive civilization (in the video below it's clear that the culture responsible for megalithic structures in Peru rose and fell prior to the Wari culture which preceded the Inca) gradually declined in technological prowess as the remaining knowledge from the megalithic builders slowly eroded. It's only been a relatively short time since tech advancement has been going forward instead of backward.



We're probably damn close to the level that this "Megaculture" had attained.

If so, it brings up a few possibly important questions.

1) If the Megaculture were Humans that were almost completely wiped out by a catastrophe, how long did it take them to reach the level of tech that they had before their demise (measuring from their lowest level to their end)?

2) Is it logical to assume that, from a similar starting point, post-Megaculture tech would, on a worldwide, overall basis, most likely advance at the same rate as Megaculture tech did from its low point?

3) And, understanding the cyclical nature of the Universe, how likely is it that the time from population decimation and abrupt end of peak tech due to natural catastrophe is a regular cycle?

4) Is it possible that Human level of tech achievement can be used as a signpost marking a cyclical cataclysm on Earth?

Just wondering.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16973401

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26814306


Actually. No. Granite is very hard to work on.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13039567
United States
11/06/2012 04:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
And the further point is that this Megaculture completely disappeared....worldwide, except for the monumental structures they built....worldwide.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16973401


Pre-flood Bible folk... seriously
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 16973401
United States
11/06/2012 09:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 26635722
United States
11/06/2012 09:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
The Bible says that after the Flood the "earth was divided". Not just the people (by language dispersion), but the earth itself was divided up. Before that it was all one landmass.

Things can happen very quickly, as the frozen mammoths with food still in their mouths in Russia/Siberia prove.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27175348
Australia
11/06/2012 09:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
The Bible says that after the Flood the "earth was divided". Not just the people (by language dispersion), but the earth itself was divided up. Before that it was all one landmass.

Things can happen very quickly, as the frozen mammoths with food still in their mouths in Russia/Siberia prove.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26635722


hehe, mammoth fail .

same mammoths also prove the earth is far older then the bible folk claim it is.
SpiralOut12

User ID: 753397
United States
11/06/2012 10:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
abduct
Love & Light

We'll ride the spiral to the end and may just go where no one's been.

Spiral out. Keep going...
SpiralOut12

User ID: 23215144
United States
11/08/2012 03:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
peace
Love & Light

We'll ride the spiral to the end and may just go where no one's been.

Spiral out. Keep going...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8343252
Canada
11/08/2012 04:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
The stone he is referring to is actually quite easy to work.

Whatever the reason they disappeared (left the planet with all the tech that wasn't immovable while leaving behind some people as an experiment...or wiped out by a catastrophe so complete that only the truly megalithic structures and small pockets of survivors remained), the civilization that appeared after them was much less technologically proficient.

For thousands of years each successive civilization (in the video below it's clear that the culture responsible for megalithic structures in Peru rose and fell prior to the Wari culture which preceded the Inca) gradually declined in technological prowess as the remaining knowledge from the megalithic builders slowly eroded. It's only been a relatively short time since tech advancement has been going forward instead of backward.



We're probably damn close to the level that this "Megaculture" had attained.

If so, it brings up a few possibly important questions.

1) If the Megaculture were Humans that were almost completely wiped out by a catastrophe, how long did it take them to reach the level of tech that they had before their demise (measuring from their lowest level to their end)?

2) Is it logical to assume that, from a similar starting point, post-Megaculture tech would, on a worldwide, overall basis, most likely advance at the same rate as Megaculture tech did from its low point?

3) And, understanding the cyclical nature of the Universe, how likely is it that the time from population decimation and abrupt end of peak tech due to natural catastrophe is a regular cycle?

4) Is it possible that Human level of tech achievement can be used as a signpost marking a cyclical cataclysm on Earth?

Just wondering.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16973401

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26814306


So explain this stone.

 Quoting: Joker


I would suggest they quarried the entire wall as one large block. Then they used saws to cut the wall into smaller blocks for removal and reassembled the wall exactly as it originaly stood in the quarry.

I'd be interrested to see the corners. I would guess they are not near as perfectly fit unless they quarried the whole building in one piece then cut it up. That would be surprising to me.

That was the cloud people who built that BTW. They were blonde haired Whites. Back then, as it still is today, anything that means anything is done by White people. That shitty mishmash of rocks opposite the perfect wall is a typical result of minorities trying to imitate White people.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 26795689
United States
11/08/2012 04:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
Thanks.

The Megaculture definitely could do some things we can't do today.
But it's a good bet we do some things today that they couldn't do.

And there's probably a lot of instances where both achieved the same results using different approaches and methods.

If there is a cyclical event that stops every rise in tech advancement, I'd say we're getting close. The Mayan Calendar and other harbingers of cyclical "doom" like Timewave Zero and some biblical stuff and ancient Egyptian stuff...etc keep looking more plausible with all the other social, planetary, solar, and galactic events getting weirder and weirder at an accelerating pace.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16973401


Well said. : )
Funney

User ID: 11648979
Czechia
11/08/2012 04:29 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
material as a tool
earth as a chance to use it
for the rising of the soul

no matter how complex times you are in
it FITS always with your possibilities of/in that time

i always wondered how many same tries and errors we already had

just the fact that the historic Pangea was not 1st, but altready 4th supercontinet in a row, is supporting this information (of cyclical civilization rising and falling)

we see here that it is not important how big a civilizations is, or what wonders they can do with their technologies,
but what kind of HUMAN it produces, IS IMPORTANT!

and it could be god or nature or even higher stages of our forms from previous times, nurturing these places for growth of organism-souls, in order to ensure continuation of LIFE


hf
moral reasoning takes about 250 miliseconds
we make errors in between
perception->relation->behaviour
grasptheuniverse

User ID: 27324723
Australia
11/08/2012 04:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
bump
caz
Rudysarsof

User ID: 19960128
Australia
11/08/2012 05:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Further Archaeological Evidence that the First Megalithic Builders Were One Global Civilization
The stone he is referring to is actually quite easy to work.

Whatever the reason they disappeared (left the planet with all the tech that wasn't immovable while leaving behind some people as an experiment...or wiped out by a catastrophe so complete that only the truly megalithic structures and small pockets of survivors remained), the civilization that appeared after them was much less technologically proficient.

For thousands of years each successive civilization (in the video below it's clear that the culture responsible for megalithic structures in Peru rose and fell prior to the Wari culture which preceded the Inca) gradually declined in technological prowess as the remaining knowledge from the megalithic builders slowly eroded. It's only been a relatively short time since tech advancement has been going forward instead of backward.



We're probably damn close to the level that this "Megaculture" had attained.

If so, it brings up a few possibly important questions.

1) If the Megaculture were Humans that were almost completely wiped out by a catastrophe, how long did it take them to reach the level of tech that they had before their demise (measuring from their lowest level to their end)?

2) Is it logical to assume that, from a similar starting point, post-Megaculture tech would, on a worldwide, overall basis, most likely advance at the same rate as Megaculture tech did from its low point?

3) And, understanding the cyclical nature of the Universe, how likely is it that the time from population decimation and abrupt end of peak tech due to natural catastrophe is a regular cycle?

4) Is it possible that Human level of tech achievement can be used as a signpost marking a cyclical cataclysm on Earth?

Just wondering.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16973401

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26814306


So explain this stone.

 Quoting: Joker


I would suggest they quarried the entire wall as one large block. Then they used saws to cut the wall into smaller blocks for removal and reassembled the wall exactly as it originaly stood in the quarry.

I'd be interrested to see the corners. I would guess they are not near as perfectly fit unless they quarried the whole building in one piece then cut it up. That would be surprising to me.

That was the cloud people who built that BTW. They were blonde haired Whites. Back then, as it still is today, anything that means anything is done by White people. That shitty mishmash of rocks opposite the perfect wall is a typical result of minorities trying to imitate White people.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8343252


You and people like you are the reason the world is like it is today. Why bring race into if? We are all of the earth. We are earthlings, human beings. Not black not white not yellow not red. Geez man put your race card back in the deck and look at the world as one. White America is not the centre of the universe. Grow up.
It is a lot easier to lie when you are the only one who knows the truth than it is to find the truth when all you know is lies.

Remember people the revolution starts with you.
Sorry my mistake.
Revolution starts with R.
Change begins with.....nope that begins with C
Hold on I am sure I will get this.
Progress begin....damn.

Oh I got it
Youthfulness begins with you, so do your part and be childish
And remember you can not spell awesome without ME.





GLP