40+ Tweets Per Minute About Rioting

Mental world! Blow us up please!!!

What a nice crew of fans Obo has.

:sarcastic:

Wow. Look who all is talking about it, too.

you noticed that too

Thread: Rioters Beware

Well that's not peacefull

And yet, no riots.

Obama FTW!

:anger::bad_smile::eyes_drope::horror::shocked2::money::eyes_​drope::anger::bad_smile::eyes_drope::horror::shocked2::money:​:eyes_drope::anger::bad_smile::eyes_drope::horror::shocked2::​money::eyes_drope::anger::bad_smile::eyes_drope::horror::shoc​ked2::money::eyes_drope::anger::bad_smile::eyes_drope::horror​::shocked2::money::eyes_drope::anger::bad_smile::eyes_drope::​horror::shocked2::money::eyes_drope:

just noticed this too. lots of threats from both sides...

Both sides? I don't think so. Did you check the link?

This is true... I looked... 40 or more tweets per minute about rioting if Romney wins.

dont worry there wont be any riots, looks like romney is going to lose ohio.

most of those are teenage douchebags being internet tough guys. wake me up once the panthers are out

I twitter searched 'riot' a while ago and have been watching. Lots of threats from both sides - but I agree there seem to be more from the 'riot if Romney wins' camp.

man look at them, if i was black i would be ashamed. they look like dumb animals.

Check again with your reading glasses. I'm not seeing one Romney person saying they are going to riot if he doesn't win.

I think all these people just want to destroy shit, and this is a plausible reason to justify it to them. Same shit, different butthole.

You are right.. when I started watching the stream it seemed like the threats were coming from both sides, but I was wrong. I take back my 'both sides' comment.

Its really interesting that there is so much discussion though about direct action. This element of the election somehow feels more representative/legit. Im not saying I agree/disagree with a more hands on approach - but it feels like the people are speaking, and they are being heard.

Obama is influencial indeed.

Are you calling a riot 'direct action'? You're saying rioting makes their representation more legit? That's crazy. That's like saying that a bully's opinion is more 'representative' just because he beats the crap out of someone.

Quite frankly, I'm shocked to see that so many Obama supporters would resort to it, suggest it, want to join in with it, etc.

The only thing that it is representative of is that apparently, a large segment of the population are animals with no morals, no integrity and anger management issues.

seems like a certain element of society is just looking to get more free shit. there are threats of riots if Obama wins or loses by Obama supporters

they are a disgrace

Racism lives and re-elects an illegitimate president.

I use the term 'direct action' loosely, and I don't support violence.

But I do think its important to acknowledge that we are seeing that people are really starting to feel empowered enough to express their voices and their discontent, although the tactics may be misguided. Social media is giving a voice to people who now understand the strength in unifying with others who share similar goals and speaking out together.

And I think this interest helps hold media, representatives accountable.

It's going to look like Obama is winning up until the end... when Romney will come out of no where and win it.

Why? Because it's a convenient way to start some chaos.

Social media, blah blah blah....

"Social media" is for losers, pussies, and other assorted misfits who are so STUPID they don't realize they just volunteered their personal info to TPTB.

That's exactly what I've been thinking.

most of that has to do with a song by 2chains

TOLD YOU GUYS SHIT IS GOING TO HIT THE FAN IF OBAMA DOESNT WIN

HE HAS TO WIN OR PEOPLE WILL RIOT

READ WHAT THEY ARE SAYING THESE DUMB IDIOTS DONT GIVE A SHIT

..Or 'social media' can be seen as a valuable tool for those who volunteer the information (regardless of who intercepts) because they feel it is important to share the info it with friends, family and community, and that it is also important not to let fear get in the way of spreading a good message.

I remember that the Tea Partiers and NRA were able to 'unify' and 'express their discontent' in large groups with NO violence (or talk of violence) whatsoever.

There is no way you can sugar coat poop and make it smell nice. IMHO, there is nothing positive about a bunch of people threatening to riot just because they might disagree with possible outcomes. That's tantamount to a baby throwing a fit because they don't get to have their way.