Hmmm... and isn't it a pity that Icke didn't do anything to help Savile's victims when he was told about Savile by his unimpeachable sources during the late 90's? Like I said: he could have exposed him in his books, but chose not to. WHY? Why the fuck did he only mention he knew of his vile behaviours AFTER he died? What the fuck good was that?

I see you just ignore this and try to insinuate that people who criticize Icke are part of some elite paedo ring. This is just so you don't have to answer the obvious question I posed.

You're just another brainwashed Icke disciple.