Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 3,509 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,293,877
Pageviews Today: 3,278,694Threads Today: 1,028Posts Today: 16,306
08:00 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Republicans would have won if they didn't pick a total clown for candidate

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 26102938
Australia
11/07/2012 02:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Republicans would have won if they didn't pick a total clown for candidate
This article says that the Republicans would have won if they didn't pick a total clown for candidate. Is that right? Why would the Republicans deliberately sabotage their chances?

"A sharply worded editorial in The Washington Post on Sunday argued that the only consistency in the Romney campaign had been the candidate's contempt for the electorate. But that he went so close to becoming president reveals more than we might have expected about the people and politics of the global superpower.

One of the contenders for the GOP nomination who fell by the way was former Pennsylvania senator and holy roller Rick Santorum, who warned that Romney was the "worst Republican" for the party to stand against Obama. If it's all about winning then Rick, it seems, was right."

[link to www.smh.com.au]

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!