Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,816 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 864,657
Pageviews Today: 1,098,277Threads Today: 165Posts Today: 3,569
07:15 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again.
Poster Handle DblTapViper
Post Content
Well done Matrix. Keep us all posted for future "events".
 Quoting: Wash


a MAGNITUDE 7.5+ to 8.5+ NEXT WEEK

NOVEMBER 25th Target Date for this next major quake window.

Thread: MAJOR QUAKE WARNING ALERT Magnitude 7+ to 8+ imminent 1111 to 113

posted about that date almost 3 months ago as well mate

So if you haven't seen all my videos let alone my quake warnings for ALL MAJOR quakes in 2012 and since i began posting quake warnings in 2011 thats now reached a 90% hit ratio just for MAJOR QUAKES, If you're interested and are able to understand the subject matter I present connected to Ancient Sacred Geometry with the Ley Lines of 188 I've discovered, I highly recommend checking them ALL out as I think you might find them very interesting to say the least.

Now the thing is, If I lowered the magnitude to 6.0 to 6.5 as my windows ALL USED to be earlier this year, I'd have an almost 99% success rate for nearly EVERY LARGE to MAJOR quake thats occurred in 2012 not even to mention my accuracy in 2011. But since quakes 6.5 and under are more common now than ever, once you understand the stats and my warnings let alone all that I've presented in my videos, anyone that posts such warnings lower the parameter to including 6 to 6.5 quakes like that and uses that as a basis or measure to validate their work and/or predictions, is tainting their work or creating a false impression when taken in CONTEXT or totality.

I think PG has some good information and I like some of his work, but I do have an issue with him claiming just "large quakes" under 6.5 add to his "portfolio" or merit of what he's claiming let alone the fact his warnings are NOT CLEARLY archived nor does he or anyone address what I've just explained especially since as I've also said, his work and predictions are based on other peoples research and information that I'm not seeing him give any credit to.
But since you seem to be a supporter, I'm open to you helping me answer some of these questions or address some of my points.
 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11


Are you predicting a 10plus quake?
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:



News