If you look at the math on this there are 15 quakes a year 7.0 or bigger. That's one every 24 days. So with a two day window of prediction that gives you a one in 12 chance of being right just by random selection. Additionally, there are 7.0 + quakes that he is not predicting. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13806508
Then perhaps you should check out the warnings I've put out that have hit ALL 7+ mags in 2012 and even 2011.
But either way, if you think its no big deal to pick a date for a MAJOR or M7+ and have one hit within 1-3 days over and over, LETS SEE YOU DO BETTER or show anyone that has. lol
GOOD LUCK with that one!
If you go below 7.0 there are 134 earthquakes a year between 6 and 6.9. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13806508
PLEASE SHOW PROOF for that CLAIM because your premise is FALSE. Lets see if you can figure out why.
If you go with a two day window on those you have a 74 percent chance of being right just with random selection. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13806508
please support that claim with a far better evidenced-based argument. So far you're cherry-picking and skirting total context and actual evidence for each case.
Of course the real test is the 10 that he's predicting for December. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13806508
We'll know soon enough.
Now that i might agree with somewhat.
I predict 8+ possible 9+
Either way though BIG QUAKE 7+ MINIMUM
but thats not including what might be described as a DIMENSIONAL SHIFT... which most technically won't even be aware of anyways. ;-)