DID HE STEAL IT? Obama loses 10 million votes over 2008. Links + stories inside.

POLL: Did vote fraud occur in Obama's favor?
Yes, the Republican enthusiasm was very high, yet the vote totals show opposite.
No, for whatever reason, Republicans stayed home and let the Muslim win.
Blank (View Results)

TWO BIG QUESTIONS: WHY DIDN'T REPUBLICANS SHOW UP AND WHERE DID THE WHITE VOTERS GO?

PEOPLE ARE STARTING TO ASK QUESTIONS BECAUSE THE NUMBERS DON'T ADD UP.

Romney had fireworks ready to go in Boston's bay and didn't even have a concession speech prepared. They believed they were going to win based on their internal polling.

The election was very close. Romney lost by 400,000 votes in several key swing states, that if flipped, would have given Romney at least 271 electoral votes.



**** UPDATED **** Latest info:

The Ulsterman Report

White House Insider crunches the numbers and they don't add up -- bear in mind, WHI suggests Republicans may have had a hand in helping Romney lose and Obama win (see meme below):

[link to theulstermanreport.com]

Exit poll data doesn't jibe:

[link to theulstermanreport.com]

Lame Cherry -- blog that claims election was stolen:

[link to lamecherry.blogspot.com.au]

Washington Post exit polls (I wouldn't be surprised if they remove this damning data):

[link to www.washingtonpost.com]

George Soros owned firm counted at least some of the votes:

[link to fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com]

"And although the votes will be cast in hometown, American precincts on Election Day, with the Barcelona-based SCYTL taking charge of the process, they will be routed and counted overseas."

[link to www.westernjournalism.com]

Update: Lawsuit filed in Ohio over software updates to vote tabulation machines

[link to www.computerworld.com]


----

Democrat turn out was way down, especially in early voting. Obama got TEN MILLION less votes than in 2008 -- it's just that Republican turnout was way, way down.

Romney got 3 million fewer votes than McCain in 2008. Obama got less votes than McCain in 2008.

"But the empirical evidence on the ground did not match the results:

1) Early voting in OH was up 14% over 2008.
2) Reports from the field on election day were of huge lines in Republican districts.
3) Dem turnout was way down. If rep turnout was way down, who was standing in those record lines?
4) Republicans enjoyed a 15 point lead with Independents in OH polls.
5) Romney gave a speech to 30k in Cleveland.
6) GOTV in OH was probably the best it had ever been.
7) Ras/Gallup both estimated the electorate to be R+3 to R+6.

And yet, despite all this, exit polls showed the electorate in OH to be D+8 with record low Republican turnout?

If you don't smell smoke you should.

--------------------

It was reported that shortly before the election, an "experimental software patch" was applied to vote tabulation machines in OH. This was done illegally as it had not been officially reviewed by anyone or tested prior to use.

How hard would it be to apply a software patch designed to automatically return a D+8 result? Incredibly easy. Is it also a coincidence that the most far left pollsters were predicting a D+8 electorate for OH despite evidence to the contrary? We call that "creating cover".

This was the same Administration that presented an obviously forged birth certificate to the country, knowing full well their friends in the media would give them a pass.

Would these same people be willing to commit massive fraud to steal an election?

Without a doubt.

If the results don't match the evidence, you must question the results."

---- MITCHELLVII

[link to www.breitbart.com]



Thread: ROMNEY SABOTAGED: It is destiny that Jeb Bush will be our 45th president.

Last Edited by Super Bowl Dave on 11/09/2012 12:46 AM