Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,838 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,430,703
Pageviews Today: 1,741,530Threads Today: 372Posts Today: 6,137
12:25 PM

Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
Message Subject Why do you have a problem with people receiving GOV assistants but not corporations?
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
A lot of you people here on GLP seem to think people on welfare(the vets, the disabled, the old, people who make under 20k) are the problem. But there is no outrage or anger for the companies who make billions yet find ways to stick their hands in the pot. When you come one here and make threads about people who receive "handouts" when most of them actually need all the help they can get but fail to mention companies who exploit gov assistants you look like a bunch of selective problem solving hypocrite. How can you sit behind your screen and bash these people yet turn the other way at the real problem. Its like the cop who would rather chase down someone peeing in an ally instead of the guy mugging down the street.

We need to do better.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4496880

'WE' need to do better???? How about the fucking govt. do better? 'WE' can only do so much. 'WE' try to vote out the bad ones but, corruption keeps them in office.

What would your suggestion be for - "we need to do better?"

I am sooo f-in sick of people saying that "the vets, the disabled, the old" are the blood suckers on welfare!!!!! B-f-n-S!!

Its all too obvious who the tit suckers are. It only takes one viewing of Maury Povich to know who the users and abusers of welfare are.

We all know who Romney was refering to when he said 47% but, the f-n Dems take that statement and pretend that he meant 'the vets, the disabled and the old"....

Americas government is a bigger horse and pony show than P.T. Barnum could ever dream of.

This country is in serious trouble and I can't wait for it to be the fuck over with.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16213727

Please verify you're human:

Reason for reporting: