If you believe in Evolution YOU are a big Mistake

frogs are still frogs
lizards are still lizards
polar bears are still bears
you fail.

satan delivers temporal things in this evil world (Gal. 1:4)

God delivers eternal life in the world to come (Matt. 12:32)

yeh, well, i want mine now, in cash, thank you very much.

He is a fucking nutcake.

[link to www.rationalskepticism.org]

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

That's an example of an order containing 125 birds (eg. hawks and vultures) I'm pretty certain if you would list the entire range of differences in that order you would get a similar list (other then brain function and communication in which humans are indeed exceptional).

Euhm that doesn't answer the question I posed in any way shape or form.

So no that isn't interesting that is just more Pye stuff.

Seriously the reason why humans have a different chromosome number is well documented and there really aren't any indications that "aliens did it" (although arguably I guess it is a remote possibility, but without evidence for it is useless to presume aliens did it).

Obviously, you do not understand the concept of evolution. It is simply is the change in the inherited characteristics over successive generations.

re·li·gion
   [ri-lij-uhn] Show IPA
noun
1.
a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
2.
a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects: the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.
3.
the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices: a world council of religions.
4.
the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.: to enter religion.
5.
the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith

Please show me how evolution, or any scientific theory (or even the scientific method itself) can be called a religion?


And I would suggest you should start by reading what the scientific method actually implies and what a theory in that circumstance actually is.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Obviously, you do not understand the concept of evolution. It is simply is the change in the inherited characteristics over successive generations.

I've already posted several examples of evolution amongst organisms today, actually. Not my fault you chose to ignore them to support your ridiculous fantasy.

Ten Astounding Cases of Modern Evolution and Adaptation
[link to www.popsci.com]
THERE IT IS. If you have a logical argument to present against the examples listed, which are observations you could go outdoors and make yourself if you wanted, please feel free, otherwise STFU. You can't base truth and knowledge on fabrications, as you creationists are so determined to do.

Alright...

Impressive claim.

Please show why the structure of the elements and the relationship between of types of life show that the universe and life has been created by the Biblical God.

And why exactly one cannot infer that the Hinduistic gods were responsible for this.

Obviously, you do not understand the concept of evolution. It is simply is the change in the inherited characteristics over successive generations.

Every single example from that Popsci link are ADAPTATIONS WITHIN SPECIES. This is not the same as a fish evolving over time to grow legs, walk on the land, grow fur and turn into a badger

or, even better, that a mere phenomenon called "intelligence"
pervades all stuff in the Universe, and it is all inter-linked,
and that's what makes it all work (sorta like a giant computer, making donuts)

You all should learn about Aeonic Involution and Quantum Transfiguration; as well as base parameter sets; understanding of dual infinity processing & triple infinity.



12DnAHelix
[link to spam.com]

Evolution is bullshit.

Then again, so is your Bible.

and, just because everything in the Universe is astounding
doesn't mean we have to get all stupid about it and call it "God".

Either God created everything, or everything created itself.

There is no 3rd option.

Whether or not you realize it, you are an evolutionist.

and, that is the most ASTOUNDING thing of all --
Science is discovering that evidently the entire Universe
arose out of nothing (ie. a *mathematical point* is about
as close to nothing as you can get,(and still be something
that you can talk about)).

and, that is the most ASTOUNDING thing of all --
Science is discovering that evidently the entire Universe
arose out of nothing (ie. a *mathematical point* is about
as close to nothing as you can get,(and still be something
that you can talk about)).

And since the idea of something naturally occurring from nothing has no scientific or logical basis, we can infer a designer was involved that is beyond the physical universe.

The Bible made an astounding scientific prediction that we would find evidence of a BEGINNING to the universe. Many scientists had previously believed the universe had always existed before the singularity was discovered.

Funny that the Bible also says Life was created by God, and thus predicts that Man will find no evidence of life arising from any natural causes. And with all the amazing advances in genetics and microbiology, we find that DNA(and RNA) completely defy natural cause.

Things like this should really give rational skeptics some pause. Is belief in God really as silly as you've been indoctrinated to believe?

nope.

to see and understand all of the things that you do, and
then just take this wild-ass leap in saying "therefore,
there must be a God", is ludicrous.

God follows the evidence. Scientifically, historically, logically, and morally.

It is a tiny leap of faith compared to your worldview. You just don't want to believe that the absolute truth is knowable, because that means you might have to obey it.

No, the argument does not remain unrefuted because it never refuted mine in the first place.

If you dug up a bunch of dogs, and they each demonstrated a gradual physical change, in steps, in line with the age of the remains, you'd be an idiot to call it anything but evolution.

The horse example stretches over millions of years. Evolution branches outwards to fill avaliable niches. Of course some of those species existed at the same time. Every member of a species doesn't collectively evolve at the same time. If you think evolution proposes this, you do not even understand what you're arguing against.

You and your article haven't presented a single point to disprove evolution.

Furthermore, I'm waiting for you to prove that the world is less than 10,000 years old. I'm waiting for you to prove that all fossils are from the great flood, and not from anywhere up to millions of years old like all science demonstrates. You can argue that things get sketchy in terms of precision when you go back millions of years, but every method of dating we have avaliable proves the Bible is bullshit in that respect.

Don't look now, 80,000 year old tree: [link to en.wikipedia.org]

13,000 year old tree colony: [link to en.wikipedia.org]

A huge colony of the sea grass Posidonia oceanica in the Mediterranean Sea is estimated to be between 12,000 and 200,000 years old. The maximum age is theoretical, as the region it occupies was above water at some point between 10,000 and 80,000 years ago.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

and, that is the most ASTOUNDING thing of all --
Science is discovering that evidently the entire Universe
arose out of nothing (ie. a *mathematical point* is about
as close to nothing as you can get,(and still be something
that you can talk about)).