Don't understand how Romney lost? I will tell you.

this should be good

The problem is the gravy train is about to stop flowing.

If you're a republican politician you can sneer at the "bottom half" to your rich donors dining on caviar and champagne, but don't be shocked when the half of the country you despise turns out and votes your ass into retirement.

i could not bring myself to vote for Obama-but Romney sucked donkey dick

I think that you forget that most Democrats are just as rich. Greedy and power hungry people are attracted to politics. It's not about serving, it's about power. In which case, your argument is baseless.

The greedy come in two shades - a greedy person can be rich or poor. A poor person can rape and milk the entitlement programs just as much as the greedy ruler who does the same for his own gain. Likewise, a poor person can be responsible and thankful for help and a rich person can, rarely, be just as responsible and thankful to serve the public.

This is the real difference. Judge a man by his fruits, not by what he says.

Wrong! It is practically impossible to beat Santa Claus. And thats what Obama is to the sheeple

But , so far, rich democrats havent been stupid enough to be caught on tape sneering. Romney is too stupid for the white house.

What a divide this country is becoming.

But whatever, its all in the script to the coming crash.

Thanks for reporting.

I've been saying this forever, good point

The republican party could have gotten a better nominee, it's true. It's almost like they WANTED to fail.

I can't wait till those retards are drafted.....

actually it is. earlier today I was talking to an apartment leasing manager. he was saying he knows 9 or 10 people who have had big reductions in food stamps. Now that the suckers put him in office, they can start reducing the freebies.....

So true. OP nails it.

^^^This^^^

Moderate GOP candidates in 2008 and 2012 despite the rise of the Tea Party. Major red flag.

Both parties are statist and heavily connected to Agenda 21-pushing international socialists. We can't 'fix' this through voting anymore. It is already entrenched and ready to clench its fist.

Maybe magic underpants don't work after all.

Maybe they saved themselves from a draft by preventing John Bolton from becoming Secretary of State in a warmongering neo-con administration.

There's war coming regardless

Better John Bolton than Michael Bolton.

Suckers, perfect description.

Agreed I said the same thing. Not Paul but Rohmer

John is indirectly one of the big reasons why this country is where it's at.

.
... Romney ran against Obamaclaus! ...
.
... and many classified as reps sat the election out ...
.
... and many classified as Christian felt a mormon was worse than a muslim leaner ... they either voted for O or didn't vote at all ...
.
... and lastly ... don't forget the fraud ... BIG TIME fraud ...
.
... the fraud is now down to an art ...
.

What I am curious about, is how the "poor" as you say, will react when America goes broke, and they don't get their foodstamps and free housing that obama promised them all..

Honestly it will amuse me. Because these idiots voted against a potus who would've put them back to work, and elected a libtard who relies on government handouts to garner votes. So, they will get what they want, and they will get the consequences that come from thinking you don't have to work to support yourself.

here is why

[link to www.redstate.com]


If you really need to think through this, consider MItt Romney. He is perhaps the shiftiest person to ever run for President of the United States. He shifted his position on virtually every position except Romneycare. Of all the politicians to ever run for office, he’d be the one most likely to come out and, after the Republican convention, decide he’d changed his mind. He’d be okay with abortion and okay with gay marriage.

Had he done that, he’d have even less votes.

Several million evangelicals did not vote for George W. Bush in 2000. His campaign had to work to get them back in 2004.

You may mentally decide, to escape having to deal with the other implications of this election, that if only the GOP would abandon its social conservatism it would do better. But if you do, go find yourself a new coalition because you won’t have half the votes the GOP has now. Good luck with that. In fact, if the GOP really wanted to expand with minorities, it’d keep the social conservatism and throw out the fiscal conservatism.

Richard Mourdock was one of two of the poster children for abandoning social conservatives this year. He was beaten by a pro-life Democrat.




[link to www.redstate.com]

Great response.

For floating voters they were not "moderate", for them they were ultra-right, especially Palin and Ryan. For luck you rightwing-nuts will never get that. You think you are "normal" while all other see you as continuously more radicalising fanatics.
And that's great: The more fanatic you are, the lesser your political influence. And one day you will freak out because of this. Now I know why the FEMA needs so many coffins and bullets.

To them they are normal and sane, and the others are just sheep.