Agenda 21, for the ones who never heard of it?! Be scared, very, very scared!

What I've likened this part to is them basically having a "treasure map/wish list" that they'll create of the things they want to eventually take.

My life is already a FEMA camp!

True, they will have special dispensations to utilize such things as ski resorts, safari hunting expeditions, waterfront properties (odd how waterfront areas are gradually being cleared isn;t it?)

Also heard that permission for single family houses, automobiles, gardens, etc. will be available thru costly licenses which would limit things we take for granted today to only the very rich, a few of their minions and of course, government stooges.

This issue require serious reading in order to give an intelligent and knowledgeable answer. I'll do just that, like you, researche it. Not that it will change anything, but I would like to know! I was genuinely freaked out last night when read it more in details last night.

I agree LB!

In Carroll County, Maryland, their county gov formally repudiated all things Agenda 21. There was even mention that for weeks after they "voted out" Agenda 21 involvement in their community, that staff had to go through ALL county documents and eliminate any reference to any Agenda 21 programs....they wanted any mention of A-21 ELIMINATED....haha!

But then, here in nearby eastern West Virginia, most people who have even heard of Agenda 21 think it just might be one of those conspiracy theories, you know....

It's like banging one's head against the wall here.....

As of now, for PA, if you use manure for your garden, or own at least one manure producing animal (livestock), you need to have a manure management plan in place, and they are allowed to knock on your door and ask to see it.

Well, think of it this way...local government officials then have the power to dictate WHAT is historic, WHAT is cultural, etc. and use eminent domain to obtain it. There was already something about the new Super Walmart that is going to be coming to Gettysburg...one of the landowners who owned part of the property to be used did not want to sell it, so they were going to use eminent domain to obtain it.

I hope they stick with that, I don't have much hope for Maryland and actually I wish I wasn't in PA, rather be in WV truthfully though I have not looked to see if they may be trying to implement it there.

[link to www.youtube.com]



A little education would do a person good.. I see why one would NOT want to know.. but really...you want it all to be a surprise?

This is certainly not a complete list! The one world govt types do want to damper religious influences, though, at least any they cannot control.

you'll need a Pine Gap vacation.

soon...

i have looked into this for the last three years. it is an awesome world once it's reached.

do you like star trek? you know when they show san fran or earth in general, it's not crawling with zombies as our cities are now? that's the plan and i'm all for it.

the population numbers will naturally drop as two things happen. support for those that breed outside their numbers will be left to their own fate. think of the dwindling hoods in detroit. yes, large numbers are at first herding into other cities but only to the extent that they are receiving handouts or employment. fema camps await those that can not take care of themselves and eventually, they will disappear. as support disappears from lack of good will and availability of goods, tribal instinct will take over and a self inflicted genocide will sweep the streets in quick fashion.

the second way population will drop; people and humans naturally have less kids immediately upon a taste above retarded. for instance, many illegal mexicans mowing lawns in the los angeles area are sending their offspring to school and instructing them to not have children. a small amount, granted, but an example of how there are several trends at work here to reduce over breeding in parasitic types.

this is all natural and if you believe in superman, illustrated in all lifeforms currently rocking the planet.

500 million is a realistic number and will be reached within 75 years.

as far as private property and returning the majority of space to natural, what is the argument. this is a living ball in outer space and individually, we are here for like five minutes in the grand scheme of things. your reach just won't extend beyond your grasp. if you live off of others ingenuity you get weekends off and some vacation. take a train through the woods and enjoy some fresh air. if you create, you naturally require more time and inspiration. cream does rise to the top.

there's a million positives to agenda 21. for 100 years we lived in lala land and it all just got worse. pretending to be ignorant didn't work so let all sentient creatures be left to their own devises!

Here is a little from the UN's web site on Agenda 21

found on chanpter 5.... Pay very close attention to the bold area ( And the word CONSUMPTION) as will as ( CAPACITIES OF OUR PLANET).

Basis for action
5.2. Demographic trends and factors and sustainable development have a synergistic relationship.

5.3. The growth of world population and production combined with unsustainable consumption patterns places increasingly severe stress on the life-supporting capacities of our planet. These interactive processes affect the use of land, water, air, energy and other resources. Rapidly growing cities, unless well-managed, face major environmental problems. The increase in both the number and size of cities calls for greater attention to issues of local government and municipal management. The human dimensions are key elements to consider in this intricate set of relationships and they should be adequately taken into consideration in comprehensive policies for sustainable development. Such policies should address the linkages of demographic trends and factors, resource use, appropriate technology dissemination, and development. Population policy should also recognize the role played by human beings in environmental and development concerns. There is a need to increase awareness of this issue among decision makers at all levels and to provide both better information on which to base national and international policies and a framework against which to interpret this information.

5.4. There is a need to develop strategies to mitigate both the adverse impact on the environment of human activities and the adverse impact of environmental change on human populations. The world's population is expected to exceed 8 billion by the year 2020. Sixty per cent of the world's population already live in coastal areas, while 65 per cent of cities with populations above 2.5 million are located along the world coasts; several of them are already at or below the present sea level.

I also forgot to mention that they say the human dimensions.

KEY WORDS HUMAN DIMENSIONS.
DIMENSIONS MEANS ANY MEASURABLE EXTENT, AS LENGTH, WIDTH, OR DEPTH. SO THEY ARE SAYING TO MANY DAMN PEOPLE.

So...old.

Yeah its old but still there.... You dumb ass....

I would take this off of your post if I was you.
Considering that you don't care about anything.

Better To Die on Your Feet Than Live On Your Knees."

Its funny but you are already on your knees !!!!!!!

And to make sure you obey there's Programme of action. Another U.N. Law. But wait there's more The New U.N. Consitution. The U.S. Consitiution will be considered out-date,obsolete and will go into the dumpster.

What would happen if we denounced our US citizenship?

thats what im thinking as i read this thread. weird shit.

Thank you to all the intelligent thinkers on this thread! You made it one of the most interesting to read on GLP, at lesst for me :)

I ain't skeered...bring it

Go deeper...Down the hole..
What is a strawman?

He's not that far off. Close but no cigar!What bodily function is performed more frequesntly than any other during the day?

Read it for yourself


[link to www.un.org]


where's the 80% population reduction?

I wouldn't bet on that! Remember the agreement Obama and Juliar signed???

It appears that they, (UN), think that you should already be conditioned into thinking that it, (Agenda 21), is all OK, by now.

Removing critical thinking from the education system seems to have been one of their first objectives. It seems not everyone had their ability to think-for-themselves removed though in the targeted age-groups, thank goodness.

we will be changing the role of peasantry also