Survival of the fittest? Did the evolution thingy NON-intelligently create the peacocks feathers so it could hide in the bushes Mr Darwin?

evolutionist brainwash our children into believing satans lies. We have gone to the point of no return. The only way to deal with them all is to kill them.

No dipshit.

But peacocks evolved their elaborate feathers as a means of sexual attracting mates, to continue the species.

But that's probably a little too advanced a concept for your little miserable retarded little creationist brain.

that makes no sense retard.

Yes it's way beyond my imagination, unless you can draw me the cellular blueprints for building those feathers. The bird isn't smarter than you is it?

Then, please, oh master of science, explain it to me so that it does make sense.

Creationist tard.

Certainly smarter than you are....

Easy. God created it the way it is.

That being the case, how about posting the first 100 dna equations for it's feathers, just like the bird conceived them?

How about you show the most basic level of understanding of science and evolution, say, even an elementary school level, and stop posting this idiotic creationist drivel, and then we'll talk?

lol dna equations? bird conceived them? maybe when you ask something logical you will get an answer

Science is the study of Jehovah's creative works, the attempt to understand the complexities. The theory of evolution is an attempt to deny intelligent design and replace it with 'everything is assembled by accidental random chance', not intelligence.

Dinosaurs.

Those huge ass feathers, in addition to making it look more attractive to potential mates, also makes it look like it's much bigger with a gazillion eyes staring at potential attackers. Should be useful in scaring some of the smaller predators.

....Hey, you might be on to something really scientific, like this guy

DGN is a drooling, ignorant moron. Responding with logic and reason is wasted on him/her.

I think DGN's existence is the most comprehensive and irrefutable argument against intelligent design yet.

But with that being said, I love these threads, so.

I know.... it's the scariest thing since a bouquet of flowers

Cool.... I actually broke even on this one. Hey that's a great looking .... uh... uh... hmmm.......

I believe our purpose in life is to explore, teach, and learn. This should always be done with an open mind.

Good expression;
"He has told you, O earthling man, what is good. And what is Jehovah asking back from you but to exercise justice and to love kindness and to be modest in walking with your God?"
Mic4:4

Knowing how something came about is different than knowing why it came about. Oftentimes, there is no reason why.

As to how it came about: the creationist simply asserts that the best explanations available to people in stone-age Palestine are more likely correct than the best explanations available to modern day scientists in the West.

I leave it to the readers to decide which is a more useful point of view.

Please, will you let me know if Charles Darwin ever actually responds to one of these threads?

Because you can't explain how the mindless 'evolution' thingy NON-intelligently designed any living cell at all?

Does it really make a difference how it all began. Why doesn't anyone give a shit about what we are doing right now. I mean, what are we doing? where are we going? Is this what life is all about, a stupid game of I'm right, no I'm right. Maybe we all really don't know anything.

I suspect we have something in common which is that neither of us are evolutionary microbiologists who fully understand the math and physical evidence that inform the most up to date understanding of the origins of species. The difference is that I start from the premise that I don't know so I'm open to being persuaded. You start from the premise that you have a book with supernatural credentials so you can't be open to any proof that contradicts the conclusions contained therein.

Eyespot markings serve as an anti-predatory device by either scaring off potential predators or confusing them to deflect attacks away from vital body parts.

Many peacocks have survived attacks, because the predator pounced on the peacock's train rather than the peacock itself.

What proof?

That may explain why it has the feathers. My question is how could a peacock think of that and rewrite it's it's own dna to create it?

I'm not here to debate evolution. I have my misgivings about that theory.

I'm merely explaining that there is an intelligent design behind the peacock's feathers that do more than just allow the male to impress females.