British Royal Air Force set to Enforce Syria No-Fly Zone! UK Special Ops Training Assad Assassination Squads

The first stage of the plan involves a no-fly zone that will be patrolled by British, US and French forces. Safe havens will be set up in ­Syria, Turkey and Jordan.

A Whitehall aide said: “Cameron and Obama cannot allow Assad to bomb civilians.“We can’t go in and do it but we can get someone there to have a go.

“A lot of the Free Syrian Army are ex-soldiers, they know how to shoot but need more training from our Special Forces, especially in key signals and communications equipment.”

[link to www.blacklistednews.com]

Cameron is just a complete hypocrite,they are going to arm up any old nutter,it makes me sick thinking about it!

Workings of the Vatican...

how the hell do you come to that conclusion ???

Of course they need to back the rebels. They haven't slaughtered enough innocent people yet.

Thread: Obama backed Islamic Rebels Slaughter Christians in Syria

Does anyone think that TPTB read stories in the media about their own psy-ops... especially those with the "We're invading/bombing/training-death-squads for freedom"-tone and just...



Last Edited by ~Apparitions~ on 11/11/2012 07:06 AM

Stop slaughter - learn to use new weapons and explosives. More news speak nonsense.

Aww hell no. Why is this even being considered? Look at what happened the last time, it wasn't even two fucking years ago. I guarantee, if Assad is removed, war with Israel will follow soon after.

Because that's what the Vatican tells them to say?

Hopefully there are actual religious among the FSA who will realise they must do their duty and "Green on Blue" the agents of the Shaitan. Cognitive dissonance, resolve it.

Do some research about what the Vatican-Jesuit is about.
Then you'll understand there is ground to such conclusion.

Knight Templar, Vatican, Switzerland and today's Vatican army.
Don't be offended. Be open mind.
And if you're catholic sorry for you.

"British military action in Syria would be a huge effort, but not impossible" - Sir David Richards tells BBC

[link to twitter.com]

British troops could be deployed to intervene in Syria in the event of a major humanitarian crisis, the head of the armed forces says.

General Sir David Richards, the Chief of the Defence Staff, said contingency plans were being drawn up in case the onset of winter saw a worsening of conditions on the ground.

Read more: [link to www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk]

British troops should be protecting Britain and nothing else! Disgusting.

These the same troops who are having 20-30 thousand cut?

How do we enforce a no fly zone around parts of the med without an aircraft carrier?

Oh thats right we use cyprus and probably turkey, but did anybody ask the cypriots who may now end up targets of assad if they mind?

Its all fun and games till a syrian missle hits cyprus and kills british citizens, which isnt out of the realms of possibility if we do this.

If the SAS/SBS has to be on the ground in syria to destory scud launchers and aircraft it just makes their job harder with all the mulitary cuts we have.

I have nothing but sympathy and admiration for those guys doing such a job in difficult circumstances and loathing for our administration putting them in that position.

Its not out of the possibility that if Assad is going down he could fire scuds with chemical weapons at israel and turkey and cyprus and he could try to hit them with aircraft even.

We cant cut the military like we are doing and then still think we can help police the world, its dangerous and will get people killed because they are underfunded and under equipped.

This is a dangerous idea, we better hope the US and French and other NATO states are with us on this because it could get messy.

Interesting that Head of British armed forces admits that UK planning possible intervention in Syria in response to humanitarian emergency

[link to twitter.com]


BREAKING
Syrian opposition figures signed a unity deal during a conference in Doha, Qatar

[link to twitter.com]

I think if the UK makes this military commitment and we dont do a proper job of it, it could potentially put british lives at risk on cyprus.

Cyrpus is about 300 miles from syria and has two large british bases still on it. We have upwards of 10-15 thousand british people on that island and its just a stonethrow away from syria.

Blowback is a huge issue here.

I dont know how many people on the UK mainland realize just how potentially dangerous this is.

What an earth do we do if assad fires a scud with mustard gas or sarin etc at one of the british bases on cyprus?

Its not like we can send a carrier and our harriers/tornados to the med and fuck his shit up because we dont have a carrier or harriers anymore.

What would we do threaten him with trident or fire a few tomahawks at him from one of our subs.

This shit could get fucking ugly.

"So you have enemies and you want to defeat them? Fine! But don't use slander, or tricks, or violence, or the power of money or anything similar. Enemies are never really defeated by such weapons, and they will always hold it against you, so you will have yet more trouble with them, if not in this incarnation then in the next. Even supposing you have succeeded in exterminating your enemy: it is only their physical body you have made disappear. In reality, a being can never be annihilated: their soul is immortal, and they will still hate you and want revenge from the other side. So, the war goes on; it never ends.

Everyone is mistaken - whole countries are mistaken - in believing they can wipe out their enemies with weapons, espionage or political intrigue. One country can always succeed in neutralizing another for a while, but sooner or later the other will take its revenge. So, other methods have to be found."

RAF will be forced to land by Russia, not goiong to happen Im afraid.
UK wont flex against Russia or China and they are both in the vicinity in Kazakhstan and Tajikistan.

Now we see how good these Euro-fighters are at dodging S300 and 400 SAMS.

"UK Prime Minister Cameron is preparing to use the RAF to enforce no-fly zones across Syria in a bid to stop mass slaughter."

How about the mass slaughter of civilians in Iraq? Oh no the allies only cause "colateral damage". FFS what a load of bs. These pricks must think people are as dumb as fence posts.

While they want British troops going into Syria ? They are buying themselves out in droves after 2 tours in Afghanistan, sorry Cameron you kiddy fiddling little nerd, grab a gun and do it ya fubbing self. (EATON MESS)

UK hasn't got a decent Army anymore and they want to play with Russia ?
Yes I said Russia as the treaty was signed , that any intervention outside of the UN convention will be treated like an Act of violation as per international Law. UK would be at war with Russia and China. Good Luck with that UK!

Indeed, what happens if we commit to this, but then russia tells us, shit sorry we gave assad some modern anti aircraft systems a few years back and we lose dozens of jets doing this.

Compounded with local risk to british lives this is dangerous.

I could understand the response if Syria struck british interests first, but trying to police this situation has the potential to get pretty damned serious.

I know thats what the british military are for, but im not convinced this is a good idea, maybe necessary but not good.

We have some harsh military cutting going on at the moment. I'm convinced we have to be careful here.

Moment a barrel-bomb (dropped by copter) hit NGO "DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS" in Salma, Syria

I doubt Russia and China would commit, but thats just an assumption on my part.

On a scale of how potentially retarded this is though its about a 6.5 out of 10.

Never mind Libya, this could end up more like Kosovo but with british citizens and soldiers a mere 300 miles away under fire and isreal on the receiving end of a nasty attack... so talk about a powderkeg... i think this is one.

Dorkbot, do you even watch the bullshit you're regurgitating? You have got to be a paid propagandist. Fuck you. Rot in hell.