Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,535 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 354,852
Pageviews Today: 476,021Threads Today: 107Posts Today: 2,125
03:17 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Planet X in Idaho - Poleshit-Nancy fails again

 
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
11/11/2012 04:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Planet X in Idaho - Poleshit-Nancy fails again
Leaving at almost the Speed of light? Really? Does no one know that something that massive could NOT travel at the speed of light? You would need little to no mass to travel at the speed of light, hence why LIGHT travels at that speed. It has little to no mass.

bsflag
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25108274


I disagree.

We don't know much beyond this planet. Much of Physics (which I currently study) is theories.
E=MC(2) is a theory. Duality of light is a theory (light behaving like a wave and a particle). I can go on and on.

What if a planet the size of Jupiter could travel the speed of light? You cannot disprove it, I cannot prove it.
The only way you could attempt to prove it is to use theories which wouldn't really be proof.

Though I should say, I DO NOT believe Nibiru exists. I think it's bullsh*t. I'd be able to see it with my own eyes if it did.
 Quoting: Botanator


There is this odd idea of that constitutes a "theory", these days. It does NOT mean something someone just conjured up, one day, and spouted forth. A true THEORY has had lots of background research and science is cited to back it up!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11443159
United States
11/11/2012 04:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Planet X in Idaho - Poleshit-Nancy fails again
Leaving at almost the Speed of light? Really? Does no one know that something that massive could NOT travel at the speed of light? You would need little to no mass to travel at the speed of light, hence why LIGHT travels at that speed. It has little to no mass.

bsflag
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25108274


I disagree.

We don't know much beyond this planet. Much of Physics (which I currently study) is theories.
E=MC(2) is a theory. Duality of light is a theory (light behaving like a wave and a particle). I can go on and on.

What if a planet the size of Jupiter could travel the speed of light? You cannot disprove it, I cannot prove it.
The only way you could attempt to prove it is to use theories which wouldn't really be proof.

Though I should say, I DO NOT believe Nibiru exists. I think it's bullsh*t. I'd be able to see it with my own eyes if it did.
 Quoting: Botanator


There is this odd idea of that constitutes a "theory", these days. It does NOT mean something someone just conjured up, one day, and spouted forth. A true THEORY has had lots of background research and science is cited to back it up!
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


All "science" is "theory" until the said theory is falsified
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
11/11/2012 05:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Planet X in Idaho - Poleshit-Nancy fails again
Leaving at almost the Speed of light? Really? Does no one know that something that massive could NOT travel at the speed of light? You would need little to no mass to travel at the speed of light, hence why LIGHT travels at that speed. It has little to no mass.

bsflag
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25108274


I disagree.

We don't know much beyond this planet. Much of Physics (which I currently study) is theories.
E=MC(2) is a theor Duality of light is a theory (light behaving like a wave and a particle). I can go on and on.

What if a planet the size of Jupiter could travel the speed of light? You cannot disprove it, I cannot prove it.
The only way you could attempt to prove it is to use theories which wouldn't really be proof.

Though I should say, I DO NOT believe Nibiru exists. I think it's bullsh*t. I'd be able to see it with my own eyes if it did.
 Quoting: Botanator


There is this odd idea of that constitutes a "theory", these days. It does NOT mean something someone just conjured up, one day, and spouted forth. A true THEORY has had lots of background research and science is cited to back it up!
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


All "science" is "theory" until the said theory is falsified
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11443159


I think you mean "unless" it is falsified. You are certainly welcome to falsify any theory in science. It takes some doing. Which one did you have in mind? Go right ahead.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23862708
United States
11/11/2012 05:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Planet X in Idaho - Poleshit-Nancy fails again
Haha couple weeks ago a couple of us debunked one of her OMG that truly is a beautiful pic of niribu photos. Called us debunkers, deleted the posts then banned us. Then her cult followers sent me a bunch of hate msgs about how the zetas warned them about people like me. Pretty whacked cult following over there....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11443159
United States
11/11/2012 06:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Planet X in Idaho - Poleshit-Nancy fails again
...


I disagree.

We don't know much beyond this planet. Much of Physics (which I currently study) is theories.
E=MC(2) is a theor Duality of light is a theory (light behaving like a wave and a particle). I can go on and on.

What if a planet the size of Jupiter could travel the speed of light? You cannot disprove it, I cannot prove it.
The only way you could attempt to prove it is to use theories which wouldn't really be proof.

Though I should say, I DO NOT believe Nibiru exists. I think it's bullsh*t. I'd be able to see it with my own eyes if it did.
 Quoting: Botanator


There is this odd idea of that constitutes a "theory", these days. It does NOT mean something someone just conjured up, one day, and spouted forth. A true THEORY has had lots of background research and science is cited to back it up!
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


All "science" is "theory" until the said theory is falsified
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11443159


I think you mean "unless" it is falsified. You are certainly welcome to falsify any theory in science. It takes some doing. Which one did you have in mind? Go right ahead.
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


You failed me now

I have it right and you could have said "until a better theory that explains more with more accuracy replaces it"

There is no "unless" as that would be a logical fallacy and would equate to proving a negative
Hunter 1
User ID: 23708913
China
11/11/2012 06:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Planet X in Idaho - Poleshit-Nancy fails again
Current USA information on the whereabouts of NIBIRU or one of it's
adjoining orbs has been along the latitude of Cinncinatti
39. latitude north.

Idaho , closest is Malta 43.

Donnie Gilson reported seeing it in Nevada near Lake Tahoe: 39.4

Consider this when doing the analysis.

Would sitings increase north or south now?

I think south.

refer to this location: [link to www.realestate3d.com]


As to the authenticity of the video?
without a filter? i think it should be reshot same time next day
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11443159
United States
11/11/2012 06:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Planet X in Idaho - Poleshit-Nancy fails again
Current USA information on the whereabouts of NIBIRU or one of it's
adjoining orbs has been along the latitude of Cinncinatti
39. latitude north.

Idaho , closest is Malta 43.

Donnie Gilson reported seeing it in Nevada near Lake Tahoe: 39.4

Consider this when doing the analysis.

Would sitings increase north or south now?

I think south.

refer to this location: [link to www.realestate3d.com]


As to the authenticity of the video?
without a filter? i think it should be reshot same time next day
 Quoting: Hunter 1 23708913


Agreed

With a large caliber round or 6
Reality420
User ID: 26486855
United States
11/11/2012 08:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Planet X in Idaho - Poleshit-Nancy fails again
Someone should post the kite picture she posted back in the day.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5739241


Eight years ago, in a mentality far, far, from normal...

April 2004 -
That may look like a kite, and the debunkers may tell you it's a kite, but it is a PX "Moon Swirl" dammit.
And don't you dare laugh at the idiocy of the Zetas or you'll be very sorry... SOOOOOOOOOON!

[link to img.photobucket.com]

Thank you Idol.


R.
#Geomagnetic_Storm#
"Amateur Meteorologist"

User ID: 1426914
United States
11/12/2012 02:28 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Planet X in Idaho - Poleshit-Nancy fails again
Wow there are so many ZetaTards in this thread. What Hydra posted was a clear example of a filter/lens flare. I know this because I am a photographer.

News