| Users Online Now: 2,919 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,870,989 | |
| Pageviews Today: 4,355,430 | Threads Today: 1,189 | Posts Today: 21,636 |
| 11:39 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,919 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,870,989 | |
| Pageviews Today: 4,355,430 | Threads Today: 1,189 | Posts Today: 21,636 |
| 11:39 PM | ||
Planet X in Idaho - Poleshit-Nancy fails again | |
| Menow User ID: 18943200  United States11/11/2012 04:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Leaving at almost the Speed of light? Really? Does no one know that something that massive could NOT travel at the speed of light? You would need little to no mass to travel at the speed of light, hence why LIGHT travels at that speed. It has little to no mass. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25108274  I disagree. We don't know much beyond this planet. Much of Physics (which I currently study) is theories. E=MC(2) is a theory. Duality of light is a theory (light behaving like a wave and a particle). I can go on and on. What if a planet the size of Jupiter could travel the speed of light? You cannot disprove it, I cannot prove it. The only way you could attempt to prove it is to use theories which wouldn't really be proof. Though I should say, I DO NOT believe Nibiru exists. I think it's bullsh*t. I'd be able to see it with my own eyes if it did. There is this odd idea of that constitutes a "theory", these days. It does NOT mean something someone just conjured up, one day, and spouted forth. A true THEORY has had lots of background research and science is cited to back it up! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 11443159 United States11/11/2012 04:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Leaving at almost the Speed of light? Really? Does no one know that something that massive could NOT travel at the speed of light? You would need little to no mass to travel at the speed of light, hence why LIGHT travels at that speed. It has little to no mass. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25108274 I disagree. We don't know much beyond this planet. Much of Physics (which I currently study) is theories. E=MC(2) is a theory. Duality of light is a theory (light behaving like a wave and a particle). I can go on and on. What if a planet the size of Jupiter could travel the speed of light? You cannot disprove it, I cannot prove it. The only way you could attempt to prove it is to use theories which wouldn't really be proof. Though I should say, I DO NOT believe Nibiru exists. I think it's bullsh*t. I'd be able to see it with my own eyes if it did. There is this odd idea of that constitutes a "theory", these days. It does NOT mean something someone just conjured up, one day, and spouted forth. A true THEORY has had lots of background research and science is cited to back it up! All "science" is "theory" until the said theory is falsified |
| Menow User ID: 18943200 United States11/11/2012 05:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Leaving at almost the Speed of light? Really? Does no one know that something that massive could NOT travel at the speed of light? You would need little to no mass to travel at the speed of light, hence why LIGHT travels at that speed. It has little to no mass. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25108274 I disagree. We don't know much beyond this planet. Much of Physics (which I currently study) is theories. E=MC(2) is a theor Duality of light is a theory (light behaving like a wave and a particle). I can go on and on. What if a planet the size of Jupiter could travel the speed of light? You cannot disprove it, I cannot prove it. The only way you could attempt to prove it is to use theories which wouldn't really be proof. Though I should say, I DO NOT believe Nibiru exists. I think it's bullsh*t. I'd be able to see it with my own eyes if it did. There is this odd idea of that constitutes a "theory", these days. It does NOT mean something someone just conjured up, one day, and spouted forth. A true THEORY has had lots of background research and science is cited to back it up! All "science" is "theory" until the said theory is falsified I think you mean "unless" it is falsified. You are certainly welcome to falsify any theory in science. It takes some doing. Which one did you have in mind? Go right ahead. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 23862708 United States11/11/2012 05:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Haha couple weeks ago a couple of us debunked one of her OMG that truly is a beautiful pic of niribu photos. Called us debunkers, deleted the posts then banned us. Then her cult followers sent me a bunch of hate msgs about how the zetas warned them about people like me. Pretty whacked cult following over there.... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 11443159 United States11/11/2012 06:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Botanator I disagree. We don't know much beyond this planet. Much of Physics (which I currently study) is theories. E=MC(2) is a theor Duality of light is a theory (light behaving like a wave and a particle). I can go on and on. What if a planet the size of Jupiter could travel the speed of light? You cannot disprove it, I cannot prove it. The only way you could attempt to prove it is to use theories which wouldn't really be proof. Though I should say, I DO NOT believe Nibiru exists. I think it's bullsh*t. I'd be able to see it with my own eyes if it did. There is this odd idea of that constitutes a "theory", these days. It does NOT mean something someone just conjured up, one day, and spouted forth. A true THEORY has had lots of background research and science is cited to back it up! All "science" is "theory" until the said theory is falsified I think you mean "unless" it is falsified. You are certainly welcome to falsify any theory in science. It takes some doing. Which one did you have in mind? Go right ahead. You failed me now I have it right and you could have said "until a better theory that explains more with more accuracy replaces it" There is no "unless" as that would be a logical fallacy and would equate to proving a negative |
| Hunter 1 User ID: 23708913  China11/11/2012 06:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Current USA information on the whereabouts of NIBIRU or one of it's adjoining orbs has been along the latitude of Cinncinatti 39. latitude north. Idaho , closest is Malta 43. Donnie Gilson reported seeing it in Nevada near Lake Tahoe: 39.4 Consider this when doing the analysis. Would sitings increase north or south now? I think south. refer to this location: [link to www.realestate3d.com] As to the authenticity of the video? without a filter? i think it should be reshot same time next day |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 11443159 United States11/11/2012 06:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Current USA information on the whereabouts of NIBIRU or one of it's Quoting: Hunter 1 23708913 adjoining orbs has been along the latitude of Cinncinatti 39. latitude north. Idaho , closest is Malta 43. Donnie Gilson reported seeing it in Nevada near Lake Tahoe: 39.4 Consider this when doing the analysis. Would sitings increase north or south now? I think south. refer to this location: [link to www.realestate3d.com] As to the authenticity of the video? without a filter? i think it should be reshot same time next day Agreed With a large caliber round or 6 |
| Reality420 User ID: 26486855 United States11/11/2012 08:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Eight years ago, in a mentality far, far, from normal... April 2004 - That may look like a kite, and the debunkers may tell you it's a kite, but it is a PX "Moon Swirl" dammit. And don't you dare laugh at the idiocy of the Zetas or you'll be very sorry... SOOOOOOOOOON! [link to img.photobucket.com] Thank you Idol. R. |
| #Geomagnetic_Storm# "Official SunTard"  User ID: 1426914 United States11/12/2012 02:28 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
