if there were no police forces... | |
| Big Tex User ID: 18629147 11/11/2012 05:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25672410 11/11/2012 05:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Hawk-02 Hawk-O-Holic User ID: 972552 11/11/2012 05:15 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 8415020 11/11/2012 05:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 3538082 11/11/2012 05:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15594856 11/11/2012 05:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | barbarian savages would try to kill you, rape your wife, and seize your property and possessions. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8415020 in a police free state, shit would soon become like Mad Max. would you prefer the protection of police / armed forces or would you prefer to defend yourself, family and property? i think the latter option would eventually prove futile. i know things could be better, but if we didn't pay taxes for police protection we'd be living in mogadishu-style conditions 24/7. how bad that would be. You DO realize how full of shit your premise and fallout is right? Do you know how many successful bank robberies there were in the "Wild" west which had little to no government or law men? Before 1900 there were no successful bank robberies in any of the major towns in Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, the Dakotas, Kansas, Nebraska, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Nevada, Utah, or New Mexico with only a PAIR of them in California and Arizona. Remember Dodge City? The one that was SOOOOOO violent? It's most violent year was 1878 where there were *GASP* FIVE murders. Compare that today to our small towns and today we're far more violent WITH a police force than we ever were without one. For a bit more information... ...by the late nineteenth century, “the homicide rate for adult relatives was 0.3 to 0.6 per 100,000 adults per year in the rural North, 0.4 to 1.8 per 100,000 in the rural South, 0.8 per 100,000 in rural California, and 0.6 to 1 per 100,000 in northern, southern, and southwestern cities.” - viii. Roth, p. 290 In todays modern age with all the lack of morality and ethics and a percentage of the populace who knows nothing but "getting their's by any means necessary"... yeah, you'd have those problems in certain areas for a little while maybe. But the suggestion that if we didn't pay taxes for the police to keep us safe is complete bullshit. I don't even want to look it up because I KNOW it's worse than Afghanistan but go ahead and look up Detroit or Chicago's crime rates and see how well that tax for safety thing really works. Americans have always protected themselves and their neighbors until rather recently (last half to full century)and have a much better response time and rate of lives saved than any police force. The latter option guarantees your safety while the former ensures your slavery. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 8415020 11/11/2012 05:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | barbarian savages would try to kill you, rape your wife, and seize your property and possessions. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8415020 in a police free state, shit would soon become like Mad Max. would you prefer the protection of police / armed forces or would you prefer to defend yourself, family and property? i think the latter option would eventually prove futile. i know things could be better, but if we didn't pay taxes for police protection we'd be living in mogadishu-style conditions 24/7. how bad that would be. You DO realize how full of shit your premise and fallout is right? Do you know how many successful bank robberies there were in the "Wild" west which had little to no government or law men? Before 1900 there were no successful bank robberies in any of the major towns in Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, the Dakotas, Kansas, Nebraska, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Nevada, Utah, or New Mexico with only a PAIR of them in California and Arizona. Remember Dodge City? The one that was SOOOOOO violent? It's most violent year was 1878 where there were *GASP* FIVE murders. Compare that today to our small towns and today we're far more violent WITH a police force than we ever were without one. For a bit more information... ...by the late nineteenth century, “the homicide rate for adult relatives was 0.3 to 0.6 per 100,000 adults per year in the rural North, 0.4 to 1.8 per 100,000 in the rural South, 0.8 per 100,000 in rural California, and 0.6 to 1 per 100,000 in northern, southern, and southwestern cities.” - viii. Roth, p. 290 In todays modern age with all the lack of morality and ethics and a percentage of the populace who knows nothing but "getting their's by any means necessary"... yeah, you'd have those problems in certain areas for a little while maybe. But the suggestion that if we didn't pay taxes for the police to keep us safe is complete bullshit. I don't even want to look it up because I KNOW it's worse than Afghanistan but go ahead and look up Detroit or Chicago's crime rates and see how well that tax for safety thing really works. Americans have always protected themselves and their neighbors until rather recently (last half to full century)and have a much better response time and rate of lives saved than any police force. The latter option guarantees your safety while the former ensures your slavery. interesting post |