John Lear - No Planes Hit Towers on 911

He is wrong, planes did hit and one left an imprint in the glass

Dude. It was obvious that planes did hit. There are many reports and amateur video of it.

The planes that hit were remote controlled

get over it, lets talk about Benghazi

it's maybe 5-10 years too late to debate this long dead issue. Anywhoo I was downloading videos of the planes hitting, good ones, on 'winmx' which is probably also long gone, back when it occurred. There were planes. Heck I was watching it live in CNBC when it happened, when the second one hit, the stock futures plummeted. Was a day I will not forget.

I'm not saying it wasn't planned, I'm just saying they used real planes on the two towers. They imploded building 7 obviously, and the pentagon, who knows, who cares.

He's wrong. One of my friends watched as the 2nd plane flew into the WTC. He told me this in 2004 as we discussed 9/11 - he worked in Wall Street at the time and had heard about the first plane hitting and went to look at the building. As he was watching the first tower burning he said he saw the second plane fly in and hit the 2nd building.

Now I believe the planes could have been remote controlled planes. The towers certainly were brought down by explosives, perhaps even by the technology Judy Woods said was used. But planes did hit the towers since my friend had no reason to lie as I detailed above.

Sucks when interesting people do stuff like this...

My ex-husband worked right there and he and everyone in his office saw the second plane hit - like your friend. There were definitely explosives. There were also definitely planes. Sorry to hear Lear come out with this.

double post

Last Edited by Girl Genius on 11/11/2012 10:33 PM

Real planes did not

Seriously, GET A LIFE !!!

nah it was faked by people who own hollywood and the media.

I watched an excellent documentary yesterday and many scientists don't believe any steel building has ever been brought down by fire alone. Tower 7 is the big red flag, because it wasn't even hit by a plane. Fire only burns at 180 degrees ferenheit and that's not enough to melt steel. It would have taken at least 250 degrees.

The ONLY plane part to hit the street was a 727 size engine. Everything else, except Mohammed's passport, disappeared. Some claim that they found 3 black boxes out of a total of 4 black boxes (2 per plane) in the total wreckage.

And, No, it should never be forgotten. It was the turning point into a police state. For OUR safety.

You know you can "see" a hologram. In this day and time, it's not safe to assume that anything you see or hear is the truth.

180 degrees? You need more learnin' fuckstain.

So if the planes that hit the towers were remote controlled or holograms, that would mean the originating flights were diverted somewhere else and the passengers and crews were murdered?

Nothing hit the tower except a low frequency pulse from a satellite which destroyed the cohesivness of atomic
structure of matter reducing concrete and steel and everything else to powder whichh itself eventually disappeared.

The BTS (Bureau of Transportation Statistics) recorded no
departure for American Airlines Flight 11 and 77.

Nothing crashed at Shanksville. The passengers of Flight 93 were deplaned earlier at Cleveland-Hopkins airport into the NASA hangar there. The plane departed with no flight plan.

Flight 77 overflew the Pentagon and probably landed at Andrews just across the Potomic.

No information on United 175.

Fllight 11 was just pure video fakery.

No pax wer murdered as most were government employees and were deplaned somehwere else and
probably given new identities. The selection process for these government employees included people who for one reason or another didn't mind a new identitiy and probably a hefty cash payment.

They could not have been remote controlled as the chance for something to go wrong was too high plus the 'nose out' video shows video fakery.

There were 51 video tapes and each one shows evidence of fakery especially the one labelled "How To Make Your Own 911 Fake Video".

John, can you link us to information on the mismatched engine found next to the crumpled Murray street sign?

Holograms is an illusion that is fake to feel or touch but is sure visible so I can see how amatuers have it on tape.

John, can you link us to information on the mismatched engine found next to the crumpled Murray street sign?



Somebody identified the engine on Murray Street as a CFM-56 which is a small engine used in early jet airliners like the DC-8.

At the time it looked like the perps were using scrap yard parts to scatter around to look like parts from UAL 175 which crashed into the South Tower.

American Airlines used General Electric CF-6’s on their 767’s and the CF-6 was an outgrowth of the CFM-56. But the CF-6 is much, much bigger.

It was thought that somebody told the perps to put that engine in the street because core parts might look like a CF-6 and they figured nobody was going to check that close anyway.

Unfortunately for the perps, UAL used a Pratt & Whitney engine PW4000 which is the only engine that could have landed on Murray Street.

So in their haste in addition to many other technical mistakes the perps made, they put the wrong kind of engine for the UAL type 767’s on Murray Street.

I think that engine ended up in a landfill or dump and could not be checked.

But like their ignorance about ACARS which is an automatic digital transmission of engines parameters during flight the Perps neglected to realize that Flight 93 after allegedly crashing in Shanksville was still transmitting the ACARS engine data 30 minutes after it supposedly crashed.

Neat trick for a Boeing 767 40 feet underground in a million pieces.

John posted as 11:11 and at 2:22
Hmmmmmm

WHY CANT THE GOOD JL BE A PERMAGUEST on GLPLVC???????

So was it BlueBEAM?

>>>> get over it, lets talk about Benghazi

...Get over mass murder and the total destruction of civil rights and let's talk about "Dancing With The Stars"...what a tiny minded jerk off!

[link to www.youtube.com]

This video shows, using ACARS data, to show
flight paths of the planes on 911.

The "do si do" routes shown at 17:00 and on
show some funny business going on. It looks
like a freaking airshow display.

The permeability of Bravo airspace over D.C.
after two hits on the WTC, shows complicity
by someone.

The shit just hit the fan on the 911 debacle. John Lear may not be your cup of tea per se but...he is the real deal and is to be respected, IMHO.

That is exactly what I was thinking for 9 years then I realized the truth. There is no amateur footage - all is cgi and the witnesses were mosly actors. There is a very good documentry just focusing on the film material an the many mistakes they made.

And just an update.

It has been determined that the ACARS of Flight 93 was on and operating fully 35 minutes after the supposed crash in Shanksville.

As I have said before...there were no plane crashes on 911.


Just ignorant morons provoking a war. Just like the Gulf of Tonkin.

John, I think you lost a bit of credibility with that whole moon 'soul catcher' thing.

Still, I suppose that doesn't impact on what you say here, since they are completely different subjects.