Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,720 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,840,286
Pageviews Today: 2,953,029Threads Today: 920Posts Today: 19,252
11:41 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

*******This is for the Electric Universe People*******

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27553357
United States
11/11/2012 07:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
*******This is for the Electric Universe People*******
They absolutely need a method to explain how the Earth formed.

This is a more correct definition for stars/exo-planets:

[link to vixra.org]

This is what happens to stars when they are born and how they die:

[link to vixra.org]

This is why Velikovsky's assertion of Earth sized objects being shot out of other stars is arbitrary:

[link to vixra.org]

This is what Neptune and Uranus really are:

[link to vixra.org]

And why those two stars are required to understand life formation:

[link to vixra.org]

They are basically giant Miller-Urey experiments.

Well, that's it for now really.

Oh yea and the worst blasphemy of all:

[link to vixra.org]


It really should be no wonder why dark matter can not be found. The Sun's real mass is miscalculated! Earth is actually held in orbit mostly by magnetism as the Earth is iron in the middle! Its a giant electromagnet! As well as all the other cooling aging and dead stars such as Mercury in our system. lol
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 27553357
United States
11/11/2012 08:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: *******This is for the Electric Universe People*******
If there are any questions please feel free to ask.
more
User ID: 27509024
11/11/2012 08:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: *******This is for the Electric Universe People*******
[link to www.jamesphogan.com]
First published in Catastrophes, Chaos & Convolutions, Baen Books, December, 2005

THE COSMIC POWER GRID

"The extraordinary thing is that
scientists accept the Big Bang and in
the same breath deride the Creationists."
-- Wallace Thornhill



AN IDEALIZED UNIVERSE

I remember once, back in 1980, catching a plane from Orlando to New York, wearing just lightweight clothes appropriate to the laid-back and balmy life of central Florida, where I had moved a year previously from Massachusetts. It was early February. Twenty minutes from landing, the pilot announced that the ground temperature at La Guardia was thirty degrees, and it was snowing. I took a cab into Manhattan, and the first place I directed the driver to was "a menswear store--any store!" Two or three days were to go by before I could feel warm again. It's easy to forget that what we see when we look out at our own back yard isn't representative of the way things are everywhere.

Modern astronomy has its roots in the work of such figures as Kepler, Newton, and Laplace, whose laws described a mechanical universe consisting of electrically neutral bodies moving in a vacuum under the influence of gravity. And today's reigning cosmological theory concerning the origin and evolution of the universe as a whole is based upon Einsteinian General Relativity, which again is an essentially gravitational picture. Yet over 99.9% of the matter that we observe in the universe exists not as solids, liquids, and gases of the kind that make up our immediate planetary environment, but in the form known as "plasma."
PLASMA

Plasmas contain particles which, unlike electrically neutral atoms, carry a net charge. They range from relatively cool mixtures of neutral atoms and atoms from which one or more electrons have been stripped ("ions"), along with the free electrons, to raw elementary particles moving too energetically to combine stably. Unlike neutral matter, charged particles respond to electric and magnetic forces. (A magnetic force is created by an electric current, which is the name given to charges in motion. The field of a familiar permanent magnet arises from the alignment of large numbers of tiny fields generated by electron currents which in atoms of some materials happen to exhibit a net reinforcing effect, for example iron, nickel, and cobalt.)

more [link to www.jamesphogan.com]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 27553357
United States
11/11/2012 08:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: *******This is for the Electric Universe People*******
One of my most important papers ever written:

[link to vixra.org]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 26704639
United States
11/11/2012 08:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: *******This is for the Electric Universe People*******
Just one question, what do you believe determines gravity?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 26704639
United States
11/11/2012 08:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: *******This is for the Electric Universe People*******
Just one question, what do you believe determines gravity?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26704639


Furthermore, do you believe that Jupiter is smaller than the Earth?
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 27553357
United States
11/11/2012 08:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: *******This is for the Electric Universe People*******
I have no idea what determines gravity. That is the goal, but stating that I do understand gravity would be to ride the currents of insanity. Like what most mainstream scientists do and other con artists who ridicule others into oblivion.

If anything it has to do with the preservation of angular momentum because at the center of stars there is no pressure induced by gravity because the vectors are cancelled. Essentially if there were a giant air bubble in the dead center of the Earth you could float and travel the exact velocity as the Earth does around the Sun. lol
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 27553357
United States
11/11/2012 09:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: *******This is for the Electric Universe People*******
Well if Jupiter contains less "mass" than the Earth then it possibly could. Think of a giant helium balloon and compare it to a 200 lb iron ball. The helium balloon is much "bigger" but the iron ball has more "mass".

At the same time though the real cause of mass might not be the "matter" argument used by many 20th century dogmas, but of a sort of electrical resistance. The more electrically resistant a material is in ionized state the more "mass" the star will appear to have. Or maybe I have that backwards.

I have no idea. The purpose of this thread is to spur innovation. Not repeat dogma.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 26704639
United States
11/11/2012 09:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: *******This is for the Electric Universe People*******
I have no idea what determines gravity. That is the goal, but stating that I do understand gravity would be to ride the currents of insanity. Like what most mainstream scientists do and other con artists who ridicule others into oblivion.

If anything it has to do with the preservation of angular momentum because at the center of stars there is no pressure induced by gravity because the vectors are cancelled. Essentially if there were a giant air bubble in the dead center of the Earth you could float and travel the exact velocity as the Earth does around the Sun. lol
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27553357


Hmmm. So what do you believe causes the Levity force emanating from the Earth?
Him Again
User ID: 27749995
11/16/2012 10:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: *******This is for the Electric Universe People*******
OP, you've got it backward. Gravity doesn't pull. The rest of the universe pushes, but this push is blocked by a large mass (a planet). The blockage is strongest through the center of the planet (center of gravity actually), so the universe (aether) pushes most towards the center of the planet. Hence we are stuck down.