Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,336 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 169,280
Pageviews Today: 281,608Threads Today: 113Posts Today: 2,281
05:29 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject David dIcke Debunked in 19 Seconds
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
...



I defended his right to have his own take on things. As I would for anyone.

I doubt he got rich off the few bucks I spent on his books. They were well worth it.

I have also bought books by Voltaire, Mary Shelley, Bram Stoker, Fitzgerald, the Bronte Sisters, etc.
I doubt they swindled me, either.

All well worth the money and to have in my extensive library. All part of having a reading hobby.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1069792


defending a conman for taking your money and implanting false information into your mind? ok, your choice.

p.s. shelley, stoker, etc, wrote fiction, so you knew it was just that. icke writes fiction and markets it as truth. as a result his readers can no longer discern fact from fiction.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5932072


He hasn't conned anyone. He writes books, which you are free to purchase, or not.

He gives lectures, which you may choose to attend or not. You won't go broke if you do go.

Boy, this guy must really get under y'all's skin. He must really be on to something to get this reaction.

Interesting.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1069792


he's a big time money grabber and therefore not spiritual, although he deceives people into believing he is. anyone who is obsessed with making so much money is a materialist and therefore cannot be spiritual. that's why he's a big time fraud, and that's why he pisses me off.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5932072


You are being disingenous. It was already addressed.

Books take money to be published/mass produced.

A large venue to lecture at takes money, rent, pay staff, insurance, etc.

It's not free. But you know all this.


I suppose he could live on a park bench and speak to people in the park. Then he would be called "nuts".

Oh wait, you already say that.

It's all a big fail for you, once it's broken down logically.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP