Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,111 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 344,508
Pageviews Today: 477,794Threads Today: 114Posts Today: 2,558
05:23 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject David dIcke Debunked in 19 Seconds
Poster Handle ANHEDONIC
Post Content
I'm not going to discuss anything with you until you show the evidence that I've asked you for.

Now you have to prove something else as well, you just made this statement:

So you proclaim David to be a charlatan and a con artist who operates in 'woo woo land' yet just earlier told us that you're not anti-David dIcke and that he has presented some 'unique information' that has quote 'helped you tremendously'.

I did not "proclaim David to be a charlatan", I've said this several times:

Someone who continues to claim to be a prophet after many failed predictions is called a charlatan because that fits the definition of a charlatan, debunk it please:

A charlatan (also called swindler or mountebank) is a person practicing quackery or some similar confidence trick in order to obtain money, fame or other advantages via some form of pretense or deception.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

"So you proclaim David to be...a con artist"

I never said this. Show me where I said that.

So you proclaim David...who operates in 'woo woo land'


I never said this. I said:

"As I explained earlier Icke fits the definition of a charlatan. I think that's important enough to warn people about. In certain professions that alone would end your career but not in woo woo land."

I was talking about GLP and a lot of his followers being in woo woo land, that's where we are. Look at the banner above, it says LUNATIC FRINGE.


yet just earlier told us that you're not anti-David dIcke


I've never said anything like that. This is what I keep saying:

My purpose with this thread is not personal, my purpose with this thread is not about opinions, my purpose with this thread is not about beliefs, my purpose with this thread is not about faith...

This thread is meant to be about truth. Truth is about evidence, logic, facts, and proof.

The more information people have the better choices they can make. More information being available only helps people to make better decisions.

What I'm doing is no different than what Icke has made a career out of:

I'm pointing out the actions and statements of a public figure and the significance of those actions and statements.

The difference between Icke and myself is that I can point to actual evidence to back up what I'm saying but Icke usually can't.

that he has presented some 'unique information' that has quote 'helped you tremendously'.


He has lots of factual information in my opinion. I have never said anything that contradicts that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23254866


Do you have difficulty exercising reading comprehending when viewing your own words for some reason? I provided you with your exact words. Here they are again, posted verbatim:

As I explained earlier Icke fits the definition of a charlatan. I think that's important enough to warn people about. In certain professions that alone would end your career but not in woo woo land.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23254866


So now you are going to try and convince us that you never called him a 'charlatan' when you say he not only fits the definition of a charlatan but that you feel it's 'important enough' to warn others about? If you're not calling or implying that he's a 'charlatan' here then please tell us what you're 'warning' others about? His bad teeth?

Great point. If you can debunk half of Icke's info then he's a con artist, case closed.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23254866


Now you are also going to deny implying he was a con artist when it's right there in your own words??? Case closed?

Does any of the following mean that I'm Anti-David dIcke? Of course not. In fact he has some unique information that has helped me tremendously.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23254866


Youre denying saying this as well? You just said right there "Of course not" in reply to your question as to whether or not you're anti-David dIcke. So you're stating that you're not, and that he has presented you with QUOTE 'unique information' that has QUOTE 'helped' you 'tremendously'.


These are your quotes, anyone can scroll through the thread and see your exact words with your (OP) designation next to your name. See for yourself (Page 2, Page 14, and one other).

Not only is it puzzling that you are denying your own admissions but you still won't answer a very important and objective question. Why are you so vehemently discouraging others from listening to this individual when you by your own words found him to present 'unique information' that you personally found to be a 'tremendous' help to you. Could others also not stand to benefit in the same manner that you admit to or is there something that sets you apart from others when it comes to viewing information from a 'con artist' and 'charlatan'???

This question should be addressed if you expect others to heed your advice in this thread. Right now your tactic of denying your own posts and making conflicting statements is not serving your case very well.

peace
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:



News








Proud Member Of The Angry Mob