I'm not going to discuss anything with you until you show the evidence that I've asked you for.
Now you have to prove something else as well, you just made this statement:So you proclaim David to be a charlatan and a con artist who operates in 'woo woo land' yet just earlier told us that you're not anti-David dIcke and that he has presented some 'unique information' that has quote 'helped you tremendously'.
I did not "proclaim David to be a charlatan", I've said this several times:
Someone who continues to claim to be a prophet after many failed predictions is called a charlatan because that fits the definition of a charlatan
, debunk it please:
A charlatan (also called swindler or mountebank) is a person practicing quackery or some similar confidence trick in order to obtain money, fame or other advantages via some form of pretense or deception.
[link to en.wikipedia.org
] "So you proclaim David to be...a con artist"
I never said this. Show me where I said that.
So you proclaim David...who operates in 'woo woo land'
I never said this. I said:
"As I explained earlier Icke fits the definition of a charlatan. I think that's important enough to warn people about. In certain professions that alone would end your career but not in woo woo land."
I was talking about GLP and a lot of his followers being in woo woo land, that's where we are. Look at the banner above, it says LUNATIC FRINGE.
yet just earlier told us that you're not anti-David dIcke
I've never said anything like that. This is what I keep saying:
My purpose with this thread is not personal, my purpose with this thread is not about opinions, my purpose with this thread is not about beliefs, my purpose with this thread is not about faith...
This thread is meant to be about truth. Truth is about evidence, logic, facts, and proof.
The more information people have the better choices they can make. More information being available only helps people to make better decisions.
What I'm doing is no different than what Icke has made a career out of:
I'm pointing out the actions and statements of a public figure and the significance of those actions and statements.
The difference between Icke and myself is that I can point to actual evidence to back up what I'm saying but Icke usually can't.
that he has presented some 'unique information' that has quote 'helped you tremendously'.
He has lots of factual information in my opinion. I have never said anything that contradicts that.