Proof NASA faked at least some of the moon landing

How many times, huh? From the top..

1..2..3..

SOME OF TH FOOTAGE WAS FAKED FOR DRAMATIC EFFECT..

Got it? Now put down the keyboard and go and do soemthing more useful today.

You realize that a bad jpeg scan that isn't even hosted by NASA really doesn't prove anything right?



Or in other words, newer scans don't show the scratches, dust and jpeg artifacts.


It would help if even one of either of your images was an original. Neither are. At least one of them is flipped (I think the second from the other results I've found). The first is very badly scanned. At least one has had the color adjusted.

Here is the pic
[link to spaceflight.nasa.gov]

Last Edited by LHP598 on 11/12/2012 11:07 PM

lol

Significant tonal adjustment. At first glance, doesn't appear to be significant editing -- but based on the history the Purdue image has gone through, it very well may have had the blacks touched up.

I am more intrigued by the phrase "slide scan," however.

Why would university archives in 1969 have high-quality color photographs of the Earth from lunar distance? (And, no, it doesn't look at all the same photographed in multiple passes and stitched from a satellite in LEO!)

What does the OP think was out at lunar distance making and returning color slide film?