Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,216 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 333,776
Pageviews Today: 480,201Threads Today: 117Posts Today: 2,756
05:18 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27625670
Canada
11/12/2012 10:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
The Norton encyclopedia was in its 5th edition, and the “103 cal./gram mole” dissociation energy did not appear to be a typo or misprint, and should have been corrected by that time if discovered. How many books would I have to search to find such a ‘misprint’, especially since I didn’t expect to find the anomaly because of the obvious concealment? Yet, in Physical Chemistry (1965) by E. A. Moelwyn-Hughes of Cambridge (Pergamon Press, London), at page 418, appeared the following:

“The Spectroscopic evaluation of the dissociation energy The energy of dissociation, De of a diatomic molecule is the difference between the potential energy of the atoms when infinitely separated, and their energy when the atoms are at rest at the equilibrium separation.”

Notice that the “at rest” state of the molecules, is couched in language that makes you think that the “infinitely separated” atomic hydrogen atoms represents the “excited state” for the element. In layman’s terms, the RQMs simply made the statement that the dissociation and recombination energies had to be the same, because their theories depended upon them being the same. Then they measured the dissociation energy backwards, by measuring the recombination energy, and stating the measurement as if it were the dissociation energy.



The statements are supplanted by a lot of RQM gobbledegook, with a “spectroscopic evaluation” thrown in like some snake oil, because the spectroscope purportedly “can’t lie”. There is also in the same text, at page 417, the following obtuse statement:

“...In kilocalories per mole, De is 109.”

If hydrogen atoms exothermically release energy when they combine to form molecules, the potential energy has been lost by the molecules, yet they attribute the “potential energy” to the hydrogen molecules—backwards—to evade their duty to draw the logical conclusion. This lie is shown by a graph (“fig. 4”) purporting to show the “potential energy of the hydrogen molecule in the ground electronic state.”



This clearly misrepresents, by a Ph.D. in physics of the “Royal Society”, that hydrogen in the “atomic state” is not in a ground state, but in an excited state. In this 1965 physical chemistry text from England, the heat energy generated on recombination of the hydrogen atom is given as 109,000 cal./gram mole, then misrepresented as the “potential energy” of the “ground state hydrogen molecules” which have just formed!



But the “ground state” of hydrogen is the atomic state, with the electron at its lowest level of energy, so the RQMs are hoist by their own petards, since there is no way the ground state atoms could “store” the 109,000 cal./gram molecule. Where, exactly would this energy “reside”? Concurrently, this same figure is falsely equated with the heat generated exothermally when two hydrogen atoms—each in its “excited state”—come together to form a molecule.



Since the heat energy is released on recombination, the molecules lack the potential energy already released. The potential energy of the separate atoms in their ground states, is greater than that of the molecules, because the heat energy is released from the entrained ether and converted ZPR—not from the hydrogen atoms—when they combine to form molecules.


This is hereby unmasked as Orwellian doublethink. Since when is the potential energy of the atom of an element measured from its molecular state? This is exactly like saying that a truck sitting at the bottom of a hill has more “potential energy” than one sitting at the top, because of the energy required to drive it up to the top of the hill!



What a strange way to define “potential energy”. It is like saying an empty gas can has the potential energy of the gas that it takes to fill it up! The unique thing about the hydrogen atom, is that it is “born” at the top of the hill! Its astounding properties lie in its ability to perform as a “doorway” between the ether and the world of more familiar atomic matter.


The relativist statements have been unwittingly accepted as correct, because there is no ether or Zero Point Radiation possible under their theories, and the molecules have to have more energy than the atoms separately, because “E = MC2”. The RQMs have misrepresented and concealed this process in which separate atoms—with lower MASS—possess more “atomic” energy than the molecules! Ha! These facts on hydrogen show that E equals MUCH MORE THAN MC2.



Under relativism and quantum mechanics, “solid” matter is thought erroneously to be the most “compact”, “stored” form of “atomic energy”, because the energy is supposed to be released by the “smashing” and destruction, or fusing together of atoms, which Tesla said was false. It is clearly shown by the atomic hydrogen reaction that Tesla was right and the relativists and Einstein were wrong, because the hydrogen atoms have more potential energy in a separate atomic state than they do in the diatomic molecular state!



This can only be either because when separate, the atoms “gather” energy from the ZPR, and eject it from the ether when recombined! In either case, the energy is not stored by the atoms, and no longer possessed by the molecules after release, unless there is an even greater lie hiding in the relativist bushes. This perverse potential energy fallacy is also a way to confuse the diatomic hydrogen molecules with the nascent atomic hydrogen atoms produced by the hydrolysis of water.



The energy of hydrolysis is equated with the energy of dissociation, and the energy of combustion with the energy of recombination, yet the information presented here shows that by combining the hydrolysis of water, in which atomic hydrogen is produced directly, with the atomic hydrogen recombination process, instead of the combustion process—and perhaps throwing the oxygen away—that at least 10.5 times as much energy as the hydrolytic input can be produced, in still a third astounding hydrogen free energy process.



This is true because the atomic hydrogen process without question releases at least 3.75 times the BTUs by weight, as ordinary hydrogen does in the combustion process. Even the relativists agree that the “energy of combustion” equals at least the “energy of hydrolysis” (even though it is well known that the industrial production of hydrogen by electrolysis is generally 120% efficient).

"IF YOU WANT PEOPLE TO BELIEVE, MAKE THE LIE BIG ENOUGH."
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 27625670
Canada
11/12/2012 10:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
Now we wait for the shill-storm...pigchef
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 27625670
Canada
11/12/2012 10:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
Einstein’s image is continually built up as if that of an ultimate and infallible creature who should be regarded as a ‘god’. This propaganda not only protects the false theory, but also aids in concealment of valid theory and advanced technology which would end the reign of a world-wide power structure of corporate-statists, who think society already has all the technology it ‘needs’, else the elite’s ‘grip’ on the world, held in place by their archaic technology which exploits mineral, industrial, and banking interests owned by them, might be torn loose.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1310035
New Zealand
11/12/2012 10:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
"Energy” does not exist in physical form, but is “the ability to do work”, which is equal to “force over time”. The word “energy” is a convenient fiction, like “time”, which is an arbitrary measurement of the rate of motion of matter through ether-filled space. All events occur in the present, and the “past” and “future” are merely metaphors.
Reble
User ID: 27086568
United States
11/12/2012 10:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
E = mass x (Acceleration x Time)2 ??

Now to read your initial post...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1310035
New Zealand
11/12/2012 10:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
Einstein’s image is continually built up as if that of an ultimate and infallible creature who should be regarded as a ‘god’. This propaganda not only protects the false theory, but also aids in concealment of valid theory and advanced technology which would end the reign of a world-wide power structure of corporate-statists, who think society already has all the technology it ‘needs’, else the elite’s ‘grip’ on the world, held in place by their archaic technology which exploits mineral, industrial, and banking interests owned by them, might be torn loose.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27625670


Dude its a THEROY not fucking fact. If you have it all figured out, just build a free enrgy device and start your own theroy.

THEROIES ARE NOT FACT.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17938575
Canada
11/12/2012 10:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
Very good, now what do you plan on doing with this ground breaking discovery?
acegotflows

User ID: 19532652
United States
11/12/2012 10:58 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
basically all of our accepted "facts" are agreed upon theories that have garnered backing. Labels and associations keep it going...
"a foundation built on lies is always bound to crumble and those who aren't humble shall tumble to the earth"
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27553160
Canada
11/12/2012 10:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
Well besides your rant, they proved there is movement faster then the speed of light that puts the formula to shambles.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 27625670
Canada
11/12/2012 11:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
As a “welding process”, this process was ‘obsolesced’ by MIG and TIG welding, neither of which can compare to its welding efficiency and uses. Since the welding process was its only “public” use in the years past, the “new” processes allowed industry to toss the “obsolete” process onto the junk heap (except for their own ‘secret’ use of it).



The “new” processes were promoted by U-Know-Who, motivating their welding suppliers and the electric power companies at their own levels. More archaic tanks, transformers, gauges, torches, electrodes, gases, fluxes, and electric power, etc., etc., to be sold at a hefty profit. If people generate their own hydrogen for welding at home, how much equipment, supplies and power will they buy?


How does the atomic hydrogen obtain its energy, if not from the “ether”? No wonder establishment science doesn’t want you to know there is an ether. If we are to believe the “law of conservation of energy”, as interpreted by establishment (relativistic, ether-excluding) ‘science’, this process is impossible, yet using data available from ‘standard’ texts, I have shown that the input energy of 103 cal./gram molecule is somehow either ‘magnified’ to 109,000 cal./gram molecule of hydrogen—a multiplication of over 1,058 times—or that, by use of hydrogen as a “medium”, that the 103 calories is ‘seed’ energy (called the “activation energy”), triggering the atomic hydrogen’s apprehension of a net 108,897 cal./gram molecule, from the “ether”.


An equally phenomenal “atomic helium” process (reported in Space Aliens) is 4.6 times this output. It can be conducted the same way, and produces the same kind of electrical energy and radiation-to-heat energy transformation, in which “mass” is only a “medium” used in the process. The same principles are shared by the Atomic Hydrogen Process, by Josef Papp’s Method and Means of Converting Atomic Energy into Utilizable Kinetic Energy (Patent No. 3,670,494, of June 20, 1972), and several other discoveries mentioned here.



If these processes used as much electrical energy as they produced, and electrical energy was the end product sought, what would be the use of the processes, right? At the comparable 30 mpg for n-Heptane, helium could produce 42.86 times as much, or about 1285.8 miles per pound.


According to Van Nostrand’s Scientific Encyclopedia, 5th ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. (1976), simple electron bombardment of helium gas, in a special chamber, excites the helium atom to a temporarily radioactive isotope of extremely short half-life. In this state, the helium atom unpairs its electrons, promotes one electron to the 2s state (in which state it remains for only a very short time), and afterward releases 460,000 cal/gram-atom (per gram of helium), on collapse of the excited atom back to its ground state.



The heat is in the form of photons. This is similar to the process for atomic hydrogen, as illustrated by my drawing shown on page 102. It is my theory that while the electron clouds are in the excited (expanded) state, they gather and convert energy from the ZPR.


Apparently, as the hydrogen passes through the arc, the electric and magnetic fields, plus heat, provide the activation energy triggering the molecule’s ‘apprehension’ of an additional 108,897 cal./gram molecule of endothermic dissociation energy. Just exactly could this be possible?



Since each hydrogen atom is composed of a proton and an electron (each with a pair of purportedly equal and opposite charges) one would expect the binding force between the molecules to be very weak, but when the atoms are separated they purportedly expand greatly in size—because negative ions are larger than the non-metal atoms from which they are formed—encompassing a greater volume of Omni Matter (my term for the “ether”).



On recombination, the atoms shrink in volume, as the excess ‘gathered’ energy is squeezed out of the ether as free (heat) energy. The “endothermic” dissociation absorbs only 103 cal/gram molecule, yet on recombination, the atoms “exothermically” yield a net 108,897 cal/gram molecule. How exactly does this occur? As stated in Space Aliens, it is my theory that all space is packed solid with bumper-to-bumper “Omni Particles” (A.K.A., “the ether”).



This elusive yet dense and ultra fine, absolutely transparent matter, is meanwhile being omnidirectionally interpenetrated by something called Zero Point Radiation (“ZPR”), of such high frequency and voltage, that it is difficult to measure or comprehend.



This radiation is in (nonrelativistic) equilibrium, therefore referred to as “Zero Point” radiation. The facts proven by the atomic hydrogen process, explained by the involvement of the Omni Matter and the ZPR, are forbidden by relativity and quantum mechanics, in which a simple harmonic oscillator cannot have a stationary state of zero kinetic energy, because the ground state still has one half quantum of energy and the appropriate motion, yet by relativity’s ‘other’ rules, the principles of kinetic energy has no applicability to electromagnetic radiation (the ZPR).



Since relativity also rejects the existence of an ether, there is nothing in so-called “empty space” to contain such radiant energy, and the atomic hydrogen process would have to create its energy from “nothing”, therefore violating the law of conservation of energy, as misinterpreted by the relativists, who see all energy functions as part of the ‘winding down’ products of an “original” BIG BANG.


You can forget what the relativists said. The equilibrium of the ZPR can be upset by disturbances created in the Omni Matter—which I divide into Omnions (ultra-fine, positive “subprotonic” particles) and Omnitrons (“sub-electronic” charges carried by the Omnions—all of which the ZPR interpenetrates. Unidirectional vibrations (disturbances) in the Omni Matter cause it to accumulate transferred force from the ZPR, throwing Omni Matter out of equilibrium, and restoring equilibrium to the ZPR.



The Omni Matter’s excess force is then transferred through the atomic hydrogen atoms (or other temporarily excited, enlarged atoms encompassing it) into the atomic mass frequencies, during disturbance, thus restoring equilibrium to the Omni Matter. This transferred force is not “energy created from nothing”, but only represents a change in the “form” of some of the infinite energy (force overtime), already existing in ‘space’ in other forms (such as the ZPR, or as “sub-electronic” charges).


Whenever H2 is dissociated to 2H (H1), and the single electron clouds enlarge to encompass more Omni Matter (affected by a greater ZPR), there is a reaction with and transfer of force from exothermic atomic sources, through the molecules, into stripped Omnions which were entrapped to bind the atoms together.



This exothermic energy is sufficient to throw the Omnions within the electron clouds, and concentrated in the space between the atoms, beyond their electronic quantum boundaries, so that the additional energy needed to dissociate the atoms is regained from the surrounding Omni Matter and ZPR, restoring the equilibrium of the Omni Matter. With the recombination of the atomic hydrogen to form 2H, the converted ZPR radiant energy, and sub-electronic charges—which I call Omnitrons—is ejected (squeezed out) from the atoms, as heat or other interconverted radiant energy- of lower frequency, as the electron clouds shrink with the addition of positive charge carried by the Omnions.



The reason the electron cloud density of the hydrogen molecule is more concentrated in the area around the space between the atoms, is because of the entrained Omnions’ presence there. Otherwise, the two negative charges carried by the two atoms would cause mutual repulsion. Actually, since heat is infrared-spectrum radiation, the process can be conceived as a means of converting the ZPR from an ultra-penetrating positive (‘cold’) spectrum radiation, to a mass-reactive infrared (heat) spectrum radiation, and that is the proximate “source” of the so-called “free energy”, in the form of exothermic heat radiation. The ZPR is an analog to sunshine, except it penetrates all matter all the time and is not affected by day or night, so it can be converted to usable energy all the time with the appropriate technology, such as the atomic hydrogen process.


Incidentally, this same atomic hydrogen process, as first published here and now, is also the apparent source of the anomalous exothermic heat produced in aqueous cavitation, as well as in the so-called “cold fusion” process, which are two other free energy processes which are based on the atomic hydrogen process. In addition, it is the phenomenon which was apparently responsible for the cavitation-based, powerful fuelless pumping action produced by the “Hydro Vacuo Motor” of John Ernst Worrell Keely, in c. 1870..


The atomic hydrogen atoms have single, unpaired electrons in enlarged shells. These atoms are in Mendeleev’s Group I-a, and all the atoms in that group have unpaired outer electrons, and are photoreactive to and transmute when exposed to ultraviolet light, as do all the atoms of elements below atomic number 19.



Some of these elements transmute in visible and infrared light, and all of them can be used to transmute ZPR into usable free energy. This photo-reactivity creates temporary, artificial-radioactivity-producing isotopes of short half-life, with the emission of photon energy restoring equilibrium to the atoms as they return to their ground states. The energy for these radioactive emissions comes from the ether, not from the atoms themselves.



The atoms can be analogized by certain crystals, described by the Raman Effect, in which light passing through the crystals is “stepped down” to lower frequencies. The infrared spectrum light produced by the atomic hydrogen process is thermically reactive with normal atomic and molecular matter, because of its longer wavelengths.


The transfer of force from the ZPR, via the Omni Matter, through the dissociated H, atoms, is apparently the kind of thing somewhat cryptically spoken of by Tesla, when he stated: “There is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment.”4 In so-called “cold fusion”, the electrolytic cell produces “nascent hydrogen”, just like in the atomic hydrogen process, and the recombination of the monoatomic hydrogen to 2H releases heat, the product claimed.



This atomic hydrogen process also proves Tesla’s theory that “atomic energy” comes from the environment, not from ‘smashing’ atoms. It proves that “mass” does not even enter into the equation, and that Einstein’s “E = MC2” is wrong. Einstein’s theory says this process as I describe it could only be possible if the hydrogen were ‘annihilated’, converting its “mass” into heat, and otherwise, is impossible. But the hydrogen is still hydrogen, before, during, and after the process, and Einstein was wrong, wrong, wrong! It defies relativism, Heisenberg’s “uncertainty” principle, misinterpreted quantum mechanics, and the BIG BANG!


Perhaps this or a similar process was also what Leland Anderson referred to in his eulogy of Tesla, when he mentioned his “plucking” thermal units “...right out of the thin air”. After all, the hydrogen atoms when in the 2H molecular form are smaller, therefore “compressed”. Compression of a gas releases heat radiation, usually thought to originate with the energy endothermically absorbed during decompression, but in the case of hydrogen, the change is effected by the natural, physical process of recombination to 2H.



The molecular atoms can be ‘decompressed’ by a slight application of heat of dissociation, because the strong binding force between the atoms created by the Omnions, is more easily weakened by a small amount of exothermic energy sufficient to separate the atoms, so that the Omnions regain their Omnitronic charges from the surrounding ether and ZPR. Hydrogen atoms have the highest charge-to-mass ratio known, a ratio which almost completely neutralizes the protons.



‘Decompression’ of the electron clouds occur during dissociation, because there is less positive mass within the clouds to pull the clouds down toward the protons. As the protons dissociate with application of the 103 cal/gram molecule, this allows the greatly expanded electron clouds of the atoms to encompass a larger volume or Omnions, carrying sub-electronic Omnitronic charges equal to 108,897 cal/gram molecule, from the only source available, the ZPR and Omni Matter (A.K.A., “ether”). Since there is no great cooling activity in the proximate area of dissociation, the ‘heat’ can only come from the Omni Matter and ZPR, and is ultimately a conversion of energy in the form of random, ‘cold’ ZPR, and Omnitronic charges, into a coherent, utilizable form of heat radiation.



This process, though it can be thermally triggered, is not merely a thermal process, because the net energy released is not converted originally from thermal energy, but from ZPR and Omnitrons, into infrared (thermal) radiation. Amazingly, the raw data for this process came from ordinary science books, though the oldest text was produced in England, and would be practically unavailable to the average American experimenter. The full magnitude and output comparable to petroleum was only obviated by conversion of weights, measures, units and temperature scales, into a consistent picture, to obtain the total net outputs.



Most physicist or chemists would refuse to believe the results, even if they had calculated them themselves, and would insist that they had erred. This is indeed an inverted BIG LIE, which is told very small, and often. The BIG LIE consists of a denial that there is an ether, the distortion of quantum mechanics, and the exaggeration and minimalization of other incompatible measurements, to create a false overall picture. This is then backed up by a vacuum of information, in publicly available texts and other sources, created via the National Security Act, by the Fuel/Power Cartels.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 27625670
Canada
11/12/2012 11:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
Einstein’s image is continually built up as if that of an ultimate and infallible creature who should be regarded as a ‘god’. This propaganda not only protects the false theory, but also aids in concealment of valid theory and advanced technology which would end the reign of a world-wide power structure of corporate-statists, who think society already has all the technology it ‘needs’, else the elite’s ‘grip’ on the world, held in place by their archaic technology which exploits mineral, industrial, and banking interests owned by them, might be torn loose.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27625670


Dude its a THEROY not fucking fact. If you have it all figured out, just build a free enrgy device and start your own theroy.

THEROIES ARE NOT FACT.
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


Sure, i have the blueprints, now all i need is money and tools. Too bad I'm currently unemployed.
Here, maybe you can afford to do it: [link to www.bibliotecapleyades.net]
Reble
User ID: 27086568
United States
11/12/2012 11:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
Ah William Lyne, I have some of his books. Good stuff!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 26872940
New Zealand
11/13/2012 02:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
Einstein’s image is continually built up as if that of an ultimate and infallible creature who should be regarded as a ‘god’. This propaganda not only protects the false theory, but also aids in concealment of valid theory and advanced technology which would end the reign of a world-wide power structure of corporate-statists, who think society already has all the technology it ‘needs’, else the elite’s ‘grip’ on the world, held in place by their archaic technology which exploits mineral, industrial, and banking interests owned by them, might be torn loose.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27625670


Dude its a THEROY not fucking fact. If you have it all figured out, just build a free enrgy device and start your own theroy.

THEROIES ARE NOT FACT.
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


Sure, i have the blueprints, now all i need is money and tools. Too bad I'm currently unemployed.
Here, maybe you can afford to do it: [link to www.bibliotecapleyades.net]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27625670


ohh, I thought you said FREE energy. so how much is this gonna cost?
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 27625670
Canada
11/13/2012 03:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
Einstein’s image is continually built up as if that of an ultimate and infallible creature who should be regarded as a ‘god’. This propaganda not only protects the false theory, but also aids in concealment of valid theory and advanced technology which would end the reign of a world-wide power structure of corporate-statists, who think society already has all the technology it ‘needs’, else the elite’s ‘grip’ on the world, held in place by their archaic technology which exploits mineral, industrial, and banking interests owned by them, might be torn loose.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27625670


Dude its a THEROY not fucking fact. If you have it all figured out, just build a free enrgy device and start your own theroy.

THEROIES ARE NOT FACT.
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


Sure, i have the blueprints, now all i need is money and tools. Too bad I'm currently unemployed.
Here, maybe you can afford to do it: [link to www.bibliotecapleyades.net]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27625670


ohh, I thought you said FREE energy. so how much is this gonna cost?
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


build it first, then get free energy
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 27625670
Canada
11/13/2012 03:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
Einstein’s image is continually built up as if that of an ultimate and infallible creature who should be regarded as a ‘god’. This propaganda not only protects the false theory, but also aids in concealment of valid theory and advanced technology which would end the reign of a world-wide power structure of corporate-statists, who think society already has all the technology it ‘needs’, else the elite’s ‘grip’ on the world, held in place by their archaic technology which exploits mineral, industrial, and banking interests owned by them, might be torn loose.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27625670


Dude its a THEROY not fucking fact. If you have it all figured out, just build a free enrgy device and start your own theroy.

THEROIES ARE NOT FACT.
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


Sure, i have the blueprints, now all i need is money and tools. Too bad I'm currently unemployed.
Here, maybe you can afford to do it: [link to www.bibliotecapleyades.net]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27625670


ohh, I thought you said FREE energy. so how much is this gonna cost?
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


no idea, but maybe 2-3 grand
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 27625670
Canada
11/13/2012 03:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
...


Dude its a THEROY not fucking fact. If you have it all figured out, just build a free enrgy device and start your own theroy.

THEROIES ARE NOT FACT.
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


Sure, i have the blueprints, now all i need is money and tools. Too bad I'm currently unemployed.
Here, maybe you can afford to do it: [link to www.bibliotecapleyades.net]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27625670


ohh, I thought you said FREE energy. so how much is this gonna cost?
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


no idea, but maybe 2-3 grand
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27625670


if it were mass produced, ,maybe 800$
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1137020
New Zealand
11/13/2012 04:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
What a complete and utter load of bollocks.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21926154
United States
11/13/2012 04:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
"Energy” does not exist in physical form, but is “the ability to do work”, which is equal to “force over time”. The word “energy” is a convenient fiction, like “time”, which is an arbitrary measurement of the rate of motion of matter through ether-filled space. All events occur in the present, and the “past” and “future” are merely metaphors.
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


Nicely said

The whole e=mc2 thing is just a way of providing references.

The speed of light in a vacuum is a reference.

So all that equation is saying is

the unit we will use for energy is...

Mass X (speed of light) squared.

Because the speed of light is a reference, people all over the world can measure different types of reactions and then compare notes.

And that is why in a universe where everything is relative, they say that the speed of light is not relative.

Actually it is. But since it is the 'reference' we have chosen, we just calculate around that fact.
Person445
The West Coast Truth

User ID: 11438968
Canada
11/13/2012 04:24 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in


Rossi invented a process to convert organic waste into oil for which, in 1978, he founded a company named Petroldragon. In the 1990s, following the collapse of the company, he was jailed for bogus environmental crimes and manufactured tax fraud charges. He was later acquitted and released.

In 1996 -- without a penny to his name -- he emigrated to the United States, and quickly found employment.

In January 2011 Andrea Rossi and Professor Sergio Focardi successfully demonstrated commercially viable cold fusion in a device called an Energy Catalyzer or "E-CAT"

This device measuring 12"X12"X5" will revolutionize the home heating industry by converting mass into useable energy in the form of heat.

The E-CAT is expected to be produced in the United States and sold on shelves within a few years.

Many in the scientific community are anxiously awaiting the arrival of the E-CAT and should the product work...Andrea Rossi is expected to win the Nobel Prize.

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27655230
United Kingdom
11/13/2012 04:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
Einstein’s image is continually built up as if that of an ultimate and infallible creature who should be regarded as a ‘god’. This propaganda not only protects the false theory, but also aids in concealment of valid theory and advanced technology which would end the reign of a world-wide power structure of corporate-statists, who think society already has all the technology it ‘needs’, else the elite’s ‘grip’ on the world, held in place by their archaic technology which exploits mineral, industrial, and banking interests owned by them, might be torn loose.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27625670


Dude its a THEROY not fucking fact. If you have it all figured out, just build a free enrgy device and start your own theroy.

THEROIES ARE NOT FACT.
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


then why are all the theories taught as fact in mainstream education?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14886944
United States
11/13/2012 05:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
E= MC Vagina

Check out this video on YouTube:<br/><br/> [link to youtu.be]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 26872940
New Zealand
11/13/2012 05:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'E' does NOT equal 'MC squared' - FREE ENERGY - 1000 times more out then in
Einstein’s image is continually built up as if that of an ultimate and infallible creature who should be regarded as a ‘god’. This propaganda not only protects the false theory, but also aids in concealment of valid theory and advanced technology which would end the reign of a world-wide power structure of corporate-statists, who think society already has all the technology it ‘needs’, else the elite’s ‘grip’ on the world, held in place by their archaic technology which exploits mineral, industrial, and banking interests owned by them, might be torn loose.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27625670


Dude its a THEROY not fucking fact. If you have it all figured out, just build a free enrgy device and start your own theroy.

THEROIES ARE NOT FACT.
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


then why are all the theories taught as fact in mainstream education?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27655230


The hint is in the name "Theroy of Relitivity", "Theroy Of Evolution"

Its not difficult to figure out its a theroy

News