GENERAL John ALLEN US NATO Commander-Now also named as involved in Sex Scandal...

Keep in mind that all of the events described below are unprecedented in American military circles and all of these actions occurred in a time of war.

Some say that the chain of events began with Obama contracting with Syrian rebels aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood to kidnap the American Ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stephens. The plan was supposedly to include eventual release of the ambassador in exchange for U.S. release of the Blind Sheik, Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman, who supposedly played a role in the 9-11 attacks. It has long been known that release of the Blind Sheikh is greatly desired by the Muslim leadership in several Middle Eastern nations.

Some speculate that Pres. Obama hoped to benefit from such an exchange, the exchange of the ambassador for the sheik. He hoped to benefit by the safe return of the ambassador pumping up favorability numbers just before the Presidential Election.

The attempt to kidnap Ambassador occurred on September 11th. At the time of the attack, two former navy seals, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, were serving in the security detail at a nearby CIA-run facility. Doherty and Woods were given orders to stand down and they complied. However, within a short time they decided to defy orders and went to the embassy tried to help defend Ambassador Stephens and his staff. In the ensuing gunbattle, both Doherty and Woods along with Ambassador Stephens and another Embassy staffer were killed.

[link to articles.cnn.com]

Retired Army Lt. Colonel Tony Shaffer has gone on the record saying that his contacts within the higher echelons of the U.S. military maintain that Obama saw the SEVEN HOUR LONG attack on the embassy in Benhazi unfold as it happened. (It is also being rumored that these same sources are saying that a video that shows the President watching the attack unfold exists.)

[link to www.examiner.com]

This, of course, is compromising to the President because he has been insisting to the American people that he was not aware of the nature of the incident until some time after its conclusion.

Four-star U.S. Army General and commanding officer of Africa Command (AFRICOM), Carter F. Ham, received intelligence that there was an attack on the American Embassy in Bengazi, Libya. Thus, Gen. Ham prepared a group to go in and counter the atteck. However, he was then given orders to stand down. Gen. Ham decided to proceed with his original plan and, upon immediately doing so, was relieved by his second-in-command General David M. Rodriguez. Gen. Ham was summarily discharged from his command. General David M. Rodriguez has since been nominated by Pres. Obama to assume Gen. Ham's former command.

[link to www.thegatewaypundit.com]

Upon learning of the attack on the Embassy in Bengazi and General Carter Ham's plan to send in a force to counter the attack, and even though he also was instructed to stand down, Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette, Commander of the USS John C. Stennis strike group (Mideast Aircraft Carrier Strike Group Three), instead prepared to supply support for General Ham's team. For this, Rear Admiral Gaouette was charged with “inappropriate leadership judgment” and having been relieved of his command has returned stateside pending an investigation.

[link to abcnews.go.com]

Another of the top brass in American military circles to be fired by the Commander-in-Chief following the attack of Bengazi was Brigadier General Jeffery A. Sinclair. This twenty-seven-year army veteran was accused of forcing the soldiers under his command to have sex with him, relieved of his command, and returned to the U.S. It is still being determined if Brigadier General Sinclair will face a court martial over the allegations.

[link to news.ca.msn.com]

On November 2nd, US Navy Commander Joseph E. Darlak who met Brigadier General Jeffrey A. Sinclair at the United States War College, was relieved of duty from his command of the USS Vandegrift due to accusations of gross misconduct.

Commander Darlak's dismissal was “due to loss of confidence after demonstrating poor leadership and failure to ensure the proper conduct of his wardroom officers” during a three-day stop in late September in Vladivostok, Russia.

[link to www.msnbc.msn.com]

This past Wednesday, General David Petraeus, then CIA Director and former Commander of U.S. and NATO-led troops in Afghanistan, was himself included in Pres. Obama's purge of top ranking military leaders in the past 3 weeks. After publishing a timeline of the events in the attack on the embassy in Bengazi that contradicts the White House's own version of the timeline of these events, Petraeus was scheduled to testify before Congress next week concerning the attack on the embassy in Bengazi.

Thus, on November 7th, only one day after the U.S. Presidential Election, news broke that then Director of the CIA David Petraeus would be relinquishing his position at the CIA due to it coming out that he had an extramarital affair with his official biographer, Paula Broadwell. Since this highly publicized revelation, Gen. Petraeus has informed Congress that he will not be testifying concerning the attack on the embassy in Bengazi.

[link to www.latimes.com]

And, as of today, November 13th, General John R. Allen, Commander of U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan, has also been "ensnared" in General Petraeus' sex scandal.

[link to www.washingtonpost.com]

So, I ask you, are all the above simply unrelated cases of poor personal judgement on the part of each of these highly decorated American military men?

Or, should we recognize that where there's smoke there's often fire.

Were all of these military men who were recently dismissed for various designated purposes actually part of a long-planned (and possibly still in progress) military coup 'd etat of the government of the United States?

We owe it to ourselves and the nation to ask, what are the odds of each scenario?

What ARE the odds?

Last Edited by Biochemky on 11/13/2012 08:34 PM

While I agree there is a conspiracy afoot I don't see evidence of a brutal dictator, he is only removing his own appointees, and they still have to be approved by Congress, no?

Want to see something that has shocking parallels? Just watch the following video about the rise and fall of Rome. It's a little long, but within the first 2 1/2 minutes you will see the issue.


Folks, getting rid of the Generals over the Legions you don't like is the first step. Watch and see if Obama starts to blatantly ignore Congress altogether.

Yes they do. AND now Petraus cannot claim executive privelege ito avoid testifying.

Just to clarify that story is totally made up and no reputable news org would have a link to it-..

HUh, The whitehouse surrounding tanks? I knew my little redneck kids had houses with wheels, but I had no idea that the whitehouse was a trailer. This is like a big episode of RedNeck Dallas! Everbodys cheatin'!
I got my guns though, if I can keep em off the floor!

Fu#ks like you always get eliminated in the intra party purges.

Shills are so identifiable.