Photo of a Nuclear Explosion Less than 1 Millisecond After Detonation!

Wow...

Looks demonic to me.

This camera technology was available in 1952?!

Imagine how much better they have.

Fascinating

Very cool!

Wait a minute.

We had that kind of photographic equipment in 1952?

"The photograph was shot from roughly 7 miles away during the Tumbler-Snapper tests in Nevada (1952)

[link to www.petapixel.com] "

But seriously!

How many people saw this and didn't even think of that?!!?

1952?!
60 years ago!

Wow GLP!

This is pretty epic.

that's some cosmic shit right there.

Wild looking..


Here is a photo of a hydrogen explosion in the South Pacific... early fifties..

[link to www.abqjournal.com]

Cool, but I wouldn't want to be around one when it happens..

Looks fishy, and pretty evil.

1 millisecond isnt that impressive its 1/1000 of a second compared to what we can do today which i think is 1/100000000

They can capture colliding atomic and subatomic particles colliding at nearly the speed of light.

[link to www.google.com]

Where the secrets to the origins of everything can be found...

Imagine what they haven't shown you, that they have discovered already?

Who said millisecond?!

Perhaps you should read the article mate.

That was my point.

Imagine what they have hiding.

And fasciating...

Thats because it is demonic... Metaphorically speaking anyway

“We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects, and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity. Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do.”

- Ben Rich, Lockheed Skunk Works Director (On his deathbed)

Last Edited by -GooGooFlexy- on 11/13/2012 09:27 AM

link says it took the pic 1 milli second after the detination while only needing 1 billionth of a second of exposure to get the pic so what they really said is it took 1 millisecond+1billionth of a second to get the pic we can get that pic in 1 trillionth of a second now and now we can even get it with video

Nanosecond

Got a year that quote was said in?

In the interior on the right, middle, you can see a satanic head/face forming (eyes facing toward the ground), with his mouth opening up as though he is shouting.

Didn't he also say on his deathbed that traveling to the stars is possible because all points in time and space are connected?

Last Edited by WeAreOne on 11/13/2012 09:33 AM

Yes, we had that kind of equipment since 1940
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Here's a bunch of em....very cool...

The camera was developed in the 1940's specifically to take photos of nuclear explosions.

It can do exp times down to 10 billionths of a second...


[link to commons.wikimedia.org]

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Femto-photography, we can now litterally see the speed of light :
[link to web.media.mit.edu]

awesome pic

Great pic!

Yepper.

So when the moon-landing-tards tell you over and over again abuot how we had fiber-optic cameras back then, you probably should take them seriously & rethink that whole argument.

I think we have had massive tech for a long time, and the stuff on display from the 'moon landing' is staged so no one would know how advanced we 'really' were. Either that, or Stanley Kubrick did it.

Or both :-P

Either way, I do believe man is on the moon & mars. But that's me. My husband thinks I'm nutty sometimes but he loves me anyways.

Last Edited by tandym on 11/13/2012 09:47 AM