Photo of a Nuclear Explosion Less than 1 Millisecond After Detonation! | |
SHR Forum Administrator 11/13/2012 09:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wow... ____________________________________________________ E-mail anytime [email protected] Inquiring about a ban?, include the IP address found here. [link to www.showmemyip.com] Ooooh, see the fire is sweepin' Our very streets today... Burns like a red coal carpet, Mad bulls lost the way... War, children, it's just a shot away...it's just a shot away.... |
2012Portal 2012Portal - Mayan Beyond 2012 User ID: 15022013 Netherlands 11/13/2012 09:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Looks demonic to me. From the love of power to the power of Love - My camera and video gear: [link to graphicstart.com] --- --- --- "Jesus Christ, the Son of God our Savior" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1266452 Canada 11/13/2012 09:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
No More Lies User ID: 1707881 United States 11/13/2012 09:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Evil_Twin User ID: 23761243 United States 11/13/2012 09:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BRIEF User ID: 381742 United States 11/13/2012 09:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Éireann User ID: 27571136 United States 11/13/2012 09:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wait a minute. We had that kind of photographic equipment in 1952? "The photograph was shot from roughly 7 miles away during the Tumbler-Snapper tests in Nevada (1952) [link to www.petapixel.com] " Eireann~ I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. - Galatians 2:20 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1266452 Canada 11/13/2012 09:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23457232 United States 11/13/2012 09:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Waterbug User ID: 1295673 United States 11/13/2012 09:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here is a photo of a hydrogen explosion in the South Pacific... early fifties.. [link to www.abqjournal.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18241510 United States 11/13/2012 09:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Silvershallows User ID: 462458 Netherlands 11/13/2012 09:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22616368 United States 11/13/2012 09:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18110742 United States 11/13/2012 09:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This camera technology was available in 1952?! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1266452 Imagine how much better they have. They can capture colliding atomic and subatomic particles colliding at nearly the speed of light. [link to www.google.com] Where the secrets to the origins of everything can be found... Imagine what they haven't shown you, that they have discovered already? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1266452 Canada 11/13/2012 09:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This camera technology was available in 1952?! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1266452 Imagine how much better they have. 1 millisecond isnt that impressive its 1/1000 of a second compared to what we can do today which i think is 1/100000000 Who said millisecond?! Perhaps you should read the article mate. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1266452 Canada 11/13/2012 09:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This camera technology was available in 1952?! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1266452 Imagine how much better they have. They can capture colliding atomic and subatomic particles colliding at nearly the speed of light. [link to www.google.com] Where the secrets to the origins of everything can be found... Imagine what they haven't shown you, that they have discovered already? That was my point. Imagine what they have hiding. |
Waterbug User ID: 1295673 United States 11/13/2012 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Kuso User ID: 27664499 Australia 11/13/2012 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
-GooGooFlexy- User ID: 1238529 United States 11/13/2012 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This camera technology was available in 1952?! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1266452 Imagine how much better they have. “We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects, and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity. Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do.” - Ben Rich, Lockheed Skunk Works Director (On his deathbed) Last Edited by -GooGooFlexy- on 11/13/2012 09:27 AM -GooGooFlexy- |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22616368 United States 11/13/2012 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This camera technology was available in 1952?! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1266452 Imagine how much better they have. 1 millisecond isnt that impressive its 1/1000 of a second compared to what we can do today which i think is 1/100000000 Who said millisecond?! Perhaps you should read the article mate. link says it took the pic 1 milli second after the detination while only needing 1 billionth of a second of exposure to get the pic so what they really said is it took 1 millisecond+1billionth of a second to get the pic we can get that pic in 1 trillionth of a second now and now we can even get it with video |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1266452 Canada 11/13/2012 09:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This camera technology was available in 1952?! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1266452 Imagine how much better they have. 1 millisecond isnt that impressive its 1/1000 of a second compared to what we can do today which i think is 1/100000000 Who said millisecond?! Perhaps you should read the article mate. link says it took the pic 1 milli second after the detination while only needing 1 billionth of a second of exposure to get the pic so what they really said is it took 1 millisecond+1billionth of a second to get the pic we can get that pic in 1 trillionth of a second now and now we can even get it with video Nanosecond |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1266452 Canada 11/13/2012 09:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This camera technology was available in 1952?! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1266452 Imagine how much better they have. “We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects, and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity. Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do.” - Ben Rich, Lockheed Skunk Works Director (On his deathbed) Got a year that quote was said in? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27656174 China 11/13/2012 09:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
WeAreOne User ID: 27655046 United Kingdom 11/13/2012 09:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This camera technology was available in 1952?! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1266452 Imagine how much better they have. “We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects, and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity. Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do.” - Ben Rich, Lockheed Skunk Works Director (On his deathbed) Didn't he also say on his deathbed that traveling to the stars is possible because all points in time and space are connected? Last Edited by WeAreOne on 11/13/2012 09:33 AM Be the change you want the World to be. Be |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27655751 United Kingdom 11/13/2012 09:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wait a minute. Quoting: Éireann We had that kind of photographic equipment in 1952? "The photograph was shot from roughly 7 miles away during the Tumbler-Snapper tests in Nevada (1952) [link to www.petapixel.com] " Yes, we had that kind of equipment since 1940 [link to en.wikipedia.org] |
SHR Forum Administrator 11/13/2012 09:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's a bunch of em....very cool... The camera was developed in the 1940's specifically to take photos of nuclear explosions. It can do exp times down to 10 billionths of a second... [link to commons.wikimedia.org] [link to en.wikipedia.org] ____________________________________________________ E-mail anytime [email protected] Inquiring about a ban?, include the IP address found here. [link to www.showmemyip.com] Ooooh, see the fire is sweepin' Our very streets today... Burns like a red coal carpet, Mad bulls lost the way... War, children, it's just a shot away...it's just a shot away.... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1011606 France 11/13/2012 09:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This camera technology was available in 1952?! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1266452 Imagine how much better they have. Femto-photography, we can now litterally see the speed of light : [link to web.media.mit.edu] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18401048 United States 11/13/2012 09:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
YaRight User ID: 26127632 United States 11/13/2012 09:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1667343 United States 11/13/2012 09:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wait a minute. Quoting: Éireann We had that kind of photographic equipment in 1952? "The photograph was shot from roughly 7 miles away during the Tumbler-Snapper tests in Nevada (1952) [link to www.petapixel.com] " Yepper. So when the moon-landing-tards tell you over and over again abuot how we had fiber-optic cameras back then, you probably should take them seriously & rethink that whole argument. I think we have had massive tech for a long time, and the stuff on display from the 'moon landing' is staged so no one would know how advanced we 'really' were. Either that, or Stanley Kubrick did it. Or both :-P Either way, I do believe man is on the moon & mars. But that's me. My husband thinks I'm nutty sometimes but he loves me anyways. |