Asahi: Gov’t worried about highly radioactive fish — Why are radiation readings still 100s of times over official safe limits? | |
Waterbug User ID: 1295673 United States 11/13/2012 09:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Asahi: Gov’t worried about highly radioactive fish — Why are radiation readings still 100s of times over official safe limits? Could it be that the geology under Fukushima, which is volcanic and porous.. is saturated with contamination..? And this contamination is seeping into the Pacific everywhere along the coast... And possibly.. the 'official' sources of measurement are false... AFAIK, the coast and 20 km around Fuku is still off-limits to independent researchers. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26344682 United Kingdom 11/13/2012 10:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Asahi: Gov’t worried about highly radioactive fish — Why are radiation readings still 100s of times over official safe limits? o Tuna migrate past Fukushima. o Tuna concentrate heavy metals, like mercury in the food chain. o Tuna will also concentrate radioactive isotopes of heavy elements like Cesium (Caesium). o Why eat from the world's largest nuclear dump (the Pacific)? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27656524 United Kingdom 11/13/2012 10:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Asahi: Gov’t worried about highly radioactive fish — Why are radiation readings still 100s of times over official safe limits? o Tuna migrate past Fukushima. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26344682 o Tuna concentrate heavy metals, like mercury in the food chain. o Tuna will also concentrate radioactive isotopes of heavy elements like Cesium (Caesium). o Why eat from the world's largest nuclear dump (the Pacific)? i just ate some tuna!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25765527 United States 11/13/2012 10:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BRIEF User ID: 381742 United States 11/13/2012 11:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
the mighty Atom User ID: 27087957 Japan 11/13/2012 11:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Asahi: Gov’t worried about highly radioactive fish — Why are radiation readings still 100s of times over official safe limits? Could it be that the geology under Fukushima, which is volcanic and porous.. is saturated with contamination..? Quoting: Waterbug And this contamination is seeping into the Pacific everywhere along the coast... Very doubtful! You know the Geology under the Daiichi Plant and you know that this is not Vulcanic! The highly contaminated Fish are "Greenlings". G.Y.!B.E. |
Waterbug User ID: 1295673 United States 11/13/2012 11:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Asahi: Gov’t worried about highly radioactive fish — Why are radiation readings still 100s of times over official safe limits? Could it be that the geology under Fukushima, which is volcanic and porous.. is saturated with contamination..? Quoting: Waterbug And this contamination is seeping into the Pacific everywhere along the coast... Very doubtful! You know the Geology under the Daiichi Plant and you know that this is not Vulcanic! The highly contaminated Fish are "Greenlings". The T1, T2 and T3 geological layers include tuff [volcanic rock] The Geology of Fukushima [link to fukushima.over-blog.fr] [snip] Good and bad news The good news is that the radioactive water leaking from the plant will not be able to spread towards the Japanese inland and the Abukuma plateau due to the downward slope of the geological layers. The bad news is that there exists a fault which appears to be active right under the Fukushima Daiichi plant itself: this allows, and will continue to allow, radioactive pollution of aquifers over a depth of several hundreds of meters, as it runs through the different "waterproof" strata (4). This also means that the radionuclides will naturally be carried towards the sea by this underground water stream flowing through the permeable layers of sandstone. Sandstone is indeed the ideal rock for aquifers, as it is both permeable and fractured, providing easy movement of water. And finally, there is the problem of the type of rock on which the plant was built being rather "soft", meaning that an earthquake can only destabilize the buildings. As early as March 31, 2011, Tepco announced that the groundwater was contaminated with radioactive iodine, according to an analysis of a sample taken at a depth of 15 meters under the first reactor (link). Today, if one or more coriums have sunk into the ground, this pollution has very likely been increasing. But Tepco no longer shares any information about the pollution of groundwater. Their only concern is to present a beautiful reassuring façade, which will never solve this disastrous pollution of soil and groundwater: underground contamination is irreparable, because there is no access to it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24866361 Taiwan 11/13/2012 12:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Angelic_Warrior User ID: 23290196 United States 11/13/2012 12:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Asahi: Gov’t worried about highly radioactive fish — Why are radiation readings still 100s of times over official safe limits? If you buy unpackaged from the seafood counter how can you know where it's really coming from? When I looked at the packaging on the tuna and cod.. it comes from China. Bottom line is if fish from the Atlantic is unavailable .. which is worse for you, fresh caught from who knows where or farm raised? What is everyone out there eating? But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. I Corinthians 2:14 God doesn't choose favorites.. They choose HIM It is not the greatness of my faith that moves mountains but my faith in the greatness of God |
BRIEF User ID: 381742 United States 11/13/2012 12:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Asahi: Gov’t worried about highly radioactive fish — Why are radiation readings still 100s of times over official safe limits? My question is.. A couple of the grocery stores I shop at carry a line called "Full Circle" it's supposed to lean more toward "organic" products. Quoting: Angelic_Warrior If you buy unpackaged from the seafood counter how can you know where it's really coming from? When I looked at the packaging on the tuna and cod.. it comes from China. Bottom line is if fish from the Atlantic is unavailable .. which is worse for you, fresh caught from who knows where or farm raised? What is everyone out there eating? I don't worry about it, I just buy fresh food that looks good...but you could get a Geiger counter and check for radiation at the store when you shop if you want...might get some weird looks though... I never forgive and I never forget I am a licensed firearm holder. I will, under protection of law, use lethal force if attacked. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1471245 United States 11/13/2012 12:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Asahi: Gov’t worried about highly radioactive fish — Why are radiation readings still 100s of times over official safe limits? Right after this whole thing went down you could see that in the water near he plant it was a very green almost neon looking color. It looked like it was being realesed under water through some type of piping. I observed this on google maps. You can no longer see it, and finding the plant on google maps has become increasingly more difficult, at least or me. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 14349741 United States 11/13/2012 01:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
the mighty Atom User ID: 27087957 Japan 11/13/2012 08:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |