| Users Online Now: 1,186 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 143,111 | |
| Pageviews Today: 241,893 | Threads Today: 84 | Posts Today: 1,165 |
| 02:27 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,186 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 143,111 | |
| Pageviews Today: 241,893 | Threads Today: 84 | Posts Today: 1,165 |
| 02:27 AM | ||
Iran army ready and self-reliant: US military analyst | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 7325519  United States11/13/2012 12:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 26238410  Canada11/13/2012 12:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 4428356 United States11/13/2012 12:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you match up technology vs technology Iran has no chance...Literally no chance Iran - Possibly has the S300 surface to air missile system surrounding its nuclear developments America - Fy22 was designed to beat the newest S400 system. The Fy22 has flown against the S300 that a NATO counterpart has and destroyed it in every instance. Once air superiority is gained - game over. They will carve the country up into kill boxes, roll the carriers in and it will be good night sweet prince. Anyone that thinks Iran will be a challenge hasnt been paying attention to the chess pieces. On the flip side they will do damage to our interest in the region. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 4428356 United States11/13/2012 12:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27650525  Germany11/13/2012 12:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you match up technology vs technology Iran has no chance...Literally no chance Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4428356 Iran - Possibly has the S300 surface to air missile system surrounding its nuclear developments America - Fy22 was designed to beat the newest S400 system. The Fy22 has flown against the S300 that a NATO counterpart has and destroyed it in every instance. Once air superiority is gained - game over. They will carve the country up into kill boxes, roll the carriers in and it will be good night sweet prince. Anyone that thinks Iran will be a challenge hasnt been paying attention to the chess pieces. On the flip side they will do damage to our interest in the region. Good Night sweet prince? Like in Afghanistan almost a decade after the initial invasion? LOL Man, you seem to have NO CLUE what you are talking about... An attack on Iran would be the deadliest fault ever. It would cause WW3. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 26238410 Canada11/13/2012 12:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you match up technology vs technology Iran has no chance...Literally no chance Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4428356 Iran - Possibly has the S300 surface to air missile system surrounding its nuclear developments America - Fy22 was designed to beat the newest S400 system. The Fy22 has flown against the S300 that a NATO counterpart has and destroyed it in every instance. Once air superiority is gained - game over. They will carve the country up into kill boxes, roll the carriers in and it will be good night sweet prince. Anyone that thinks Iran will be a challenge hasnt been paying attention to the chess pieces. On the flip side they will do damage to our interest in the region. Good Night sweet prince? Like in Afghanistan almost a decade after the initial invasion? LOL Man, you seem to have NO CLUE what you are talking about... An attack on Iran would be the deadliest fault ever. It would cause WW3. No it wouldn't. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27669019 United States11/13/2012 12:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you match up technology vs technology Iran has no chance...Literally no chance Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4428356 Iran - Possibly has the S300 surface to air missile system surrounding its nuclear developments America - Fy22 was designed to beat the newest S400 system. The Fy22 has flown against the S300 that a NATO counterpart has and destroyed it in every instance. Once air superiority is gained - game over. They will carve the country up into kill boxes, roll the carriers in and it will be good night sweet prince. Anyone that thinks Iran will be a challenge hasnt been paying attention to the chess pieces. On the flip side they will do damage to our interest in the region. Good Night sweet prince? Like in Afghanistan almost a decade after the initial invasion? LOL Man, you seem to have NO CLUE what you are talking about... An attack on Iran would be the deadliest fault ever. It would cause WW3. I smell German pussy. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27650525 Germany11/13/2012 12:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you match up technology vs technology Iran has no chance...Literally no chance Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4428356 Iran - Possibly has the S300 surface to air missile system surrounding its nuclear developments America - Fy22 was designed to beat the newest S400 system. The Fy22 has flown against the S300 that a NATO counterpart has and destroyed it in every instance. Once air superiority is gained - game over. They will carve the country up into kill boxes, roll the carriers in and it will be good night sweet prince. Anyone that thinks Iran will be a challenge hasnt been paying attention to the chess pieces. On the flip side they will do damage to our interest in the region. Good Night sweet prince? Like in Afghanistan almost a decade after the initial invasion? LOL Man, you seem to have NO CLUE what you are talking about... An attack on Iran would be the deadliest fault ever. It would cause WW3. I smell German pussy. And i smell some fat and smelly american underage retard! LOL, i bet you were one of the first to cheer when Iraq was invaded! You're a puppet  |
Sneetch  User ID: 14967850 United States11/13/2012 12:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 4428356 United States11/13/2012 12:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you match up technology vs technology Iran has no chance...Literally no chance Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4428356 Iran - Possibly has the S300 surface to air missile system surrounding its nuclear developments America - Fy22 was designed to beat the newest S400 system. The Fy22 has flown against the S300 that a NATO counterpart has and destroyed it in every instance. Once air superiority is gained - game over. They will carve the country up into kill boxes, roll the carriers in and it will be good night sweet prince. Anyone that thinks Iran will be a challenge hasnt been paying attention to the chess pieces. On the flip side they will do damage to our interest in the region. Good Night sweet prince? Like in Afghanistan almost a decade after the initial invasion? LOL Man, you seem to have NO CLUE what you are talking about... An attack on Iran would be the deadliest fault ever. It would cause WW3. LOL..WW3. Yes because China wants to scrap with its best trade partner. You think Russia wants to go it alone with us? Yea WW3...what are you smoking? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25886349  Italy11/13/2012 12:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you match up technology vs technology Iran has no chance...Literally no chance Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4428356 Iran - Possibly has the S300 surface to air missile system surrounding its nuclear developments America - Fy22 was designed to beat the newest S400 system. The Fy22 has flown against the S300 that a NATO counterpart has and destroyed it in every instance. Once air superiority is gained - game over. They will carve the country up into kill boxes, roll the carriers in and it will be good night sweet prince. Anyone that thinks Iran will be a challenge hasnt been paying attention to the chess pieces. On the flip side they will do damage to our interest in the region. Good Night sweet prince? Like in Afghanistan almost a decade after the initial invasion? LOL Man, you seem to have NO CLUE what you are talking about... An attack on Iran would be the deadliest fault ever. It would cause WW3. I smell German pussy. I smell american fat idiot |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1405546 United States11/13/2012 01:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | All on schedule, of course. Israels constant bitching about Iran and talks of war made Iran a harder foe to engage with. In a way, Israel has given Iran ample warning to fortify. Does that sound like a nation that truly wants the conflict they say they are after? If Israel REALLY feared Irans production of nuclear weapons, quick action is one of the most basic mantras of war. Procrastinating as they did is a huge mistake. But thats it, Israel isn't making any mistakes. They want Iran to be strong, they want a tough war. Because, the bankers see their greatest profits in war. It's just how it is, until things change. We all face WW3 for a handful of people, international bankers that run the world. The secret leaders you never hear of. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24572147 United States11/13/2012 01:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| lawnornament User ID: 12269654 United States11/13/2012 01:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| lawnornament User ID: 12269654 United States11/13/2012 01:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hell no this will not be a "cake walk". And why are so many of you excited about going to war again in the middle east. You forget you won the genetic lotto and were born into a country where you are not living in fear of constant war. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24572147 the constant war began in 1952 when israel was apartide by decree of great britain on behalf of the poor ol holocaust victims (haha) it's been blood shed since then because "god" (the united nations and great britian) gave them that land so no one else can come in, not even the people who lived there before 1952. they all had to go, be it the next country over or 6 feet below. i hope iran cuts out the cancer that plagues the region. |
| LosTLocos User ID: 27226192  Malta11/13/2012 01:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you match up technology vs technology Iran has no chance...Literally no chance Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4428356 Iran - Possibly has the S300 surface to air missile system surrounding its nuclear developments America - Fy22 was designed to beat the newest S400 system. The Fy22 has flown against the S300 that a NATO counterpart has and destroyed it in every instance. Once air superiority is gained - game over. They will carve the country up into kill boxes, roll the carriers in and it will be good night sweet prince. Anyone that thinks Iran will be a challenge hasnt been paying attention to the chess pieces. On the flip side they will do damage to our interest in the region. "If you match up technology vs technology Iran has no chance" Of course they dont, and they know that... The U.S. has a huge problem coping with assymetric warfare, Vietnam being a classic example.. The Iranians aint stupid, they have geared most of their strategy towards assynetric warfare, i think the US will be in for some big (unpleasant) suprises if they do attack Iran. However, although you seem to dismiss their tech as way inferior, the US drone they managed to bring down intact says otherwise, this was no act of a technology deprived force... Even if you are in a minority of one, the truth is still the truth. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27674162  North Macedonia11/13/2012 01:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cakes... Afghanistan,Iraq... all cakes. Syria??? A salty cake... So, why not finish Syria first??? Afraid of Assad? Or the bear behind??? Iran had 30 years to prepare for the event! 815k army personel, 75 million population. Don't you see? It's a trap. If USA goes in it, it will spell a disaster and cause the end of the States. Wake up!!! Stop making endless wars. The world is fed up with your psychopathic rulers. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27392237 United States11/13/2012 01:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27669732 United States11/13/2012 02:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1405546 United States11/13/2012 02:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you match up technology vs technology Iran has no chance...Literally no chance Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4428356 Iran - Possibly has the S300 surface to air missile system surrounding its nuclear developments America - Fy22 was designed to beat the newest S400 system. The Fy22 has flown against the S300 that a NATO counterpart has and destroyed it in every instance. Once air superiority is gained - game over. They will carve the country up into kill boxes, roll the carriers in and it will be good night sweet prince. Anyone that thinks Iran will be a challenge hasnt been paying attention to the chess pieces. On the flip side they will do damage to our interest in the region. "If you match up technology vs technology Iran has no chance" Of course they dont, and they know that... The U.S. has a huge problem coping with assymetric warfare, Vietnam being a classic example.. The Iranians aint stupid, they have geared most of their strategy towards assynetric warfare, i think the US will be in for some big (unpleasant) suprises if they do attack Iran. However, although you seem to dismiss their tech as way inferior, the US drone they managed to bring down intact says otherwise, this was no act of a technology deprived force... I agree, because new tactics can bring a very large force to it's knees. There are accounts in history where a dozen soldiers win against thousands. A person who is blatantly disregarding the potential for revolutionary warfare shows their lack of understanding for real war planning. Publically available technology is being incorporated into guerrilla warfare, making a nasty mess of bloody tech hacks designed to kill large numbers of people. What if someone did get a lethal bioweapon into a cities water system? That is the threat we face. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27326218  Turkey11/13/2012 02:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A US-based military analyst says Iran’s ongoing massive military maneuver involving the Army and the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) shows the readiness of the country and its military self-reliance. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7325519 Omar Lamrani, a military analyst with the Texas-based global Security think tank Stratfor said “The Iranians are demonstrating to themselves and the world that their air defenses are at the highest state of readiness,” US News reported on Monday. Referring to the seven-day, Modafe'an-e Aseman-e Velayat 4 (Defenders of the Velayat Sky 4) maneuver, Lamrani said Iran aims to demonstrate and develop its existing capabilities by holding the drill. "What we know for sure is they are making progress," the analyst said. "They are becoming more independent from foreign markets." The massive war simulation was launched in Iran’s South Khorasan Province located east of the country on Monday. Radar air defense and missile systems as well as tapping, artillery and surveillance systems will be employed during the first stage of the maneuver. PG/SS [link to www.presstv.ir] Persia.. What did ya think? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1414282 United States11/13/2012 02:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27663684 United States11/13/2012 02:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ughhhh i know right. Well regardless of the chest thumping and dick size competitions, shills and pro war folks will rot with their cancers, strokes, and painful deaths in old age if they are lucky to live that long, with the burden of their childish actions to answer for. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 26983989  Brazil11/13/2012 03:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 14774337 Canada11/13/2012 03:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cakes... Afghanistan,Iraq... all cakes. Syria??? A salty cake... So, why not finish Syria first??? Afraid of Assad? Or the bear behind??? Iran had 30 years to prepare for the event! 815k army personel, 75 million population. Don't you see? It's a trap. If USA goes in it, it will spell a disaster and cause the end of the States. Wake up!!! Stop making endless wars. The world is fed up with your psychopathic rulers. Iraq's 1million personnel army was crushed in less than two months. Make no mistake, Iraq and Afganistan as independent countries were defeated quickly, fight with insurgents is a whole different thing. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27663365 United States11/13/2012 03:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 26812864 United States11/13/2012 03:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you match up technology vs technology Iran has no chance...Literally no chance Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4428356 Iran - Possibly has the S300 surface to air missile system surrounding its nuclear developments America - Fy22 was designed to beat the newest S400 system. The Fy22 has flown against the S300 that a NATO counterpart has and destroyed it in every instance. Once air superiority is gained - game over. They will carve the country up into kill boxes, roll the carriers in and it will be good night sweet prince. Anyone that thinks Iran will be a challenge hasnt been paying attention to the chess pieces. On the flip side they will do damage to our interest in the region. "If you match up technology vs technology Iran has no chance" Of course they dont, and they know that... The U.S. has a huge problem coping with assymetric warfare, Vietnam being a classic example.. The Iranians aint stupid, they have geared most of their strategy towards assynetric warfare, i think the US will be in for some big (unpleasant) suprises if they do attack Iran. However, although you seem to dismiss their tech as way inferior, the US drone they managed to bring down intact says otherwise, this was no act of a technology deprived force... Problem is when the shit goes down they ain't gonna be no drones bombing Iran, but the real deal. Of course they may send some in as Iran is tied up trying to deal with the real fighter jets. And to an extent, yes the U.S could be looking at a dire situation if it tries to occupy Iran, but if they merely want to bomb the hell outta their infrastructure and leave them in ruins there's not much Iran can do about it and most of the destruction to the infrastructure will be done and over with before Russia or China can find the keys to its war machine. However, I agree if we go there to occupy then it could be as bad or worse than Vietnam. And doing so would allow the chinese n russians to show up in time to kick off ww3. Both scenarios would be very bad for all involved and diplmacy would be much better, but we know that ain't happening. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27685864 United States11/13/2012 04:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [/youtube] [link to www.youtube.com] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 6603467  Denmark11/13/2012 04:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Anyone comparing the Iraq/Afghanistan conflicts with a conflict with Iran, with or without their allies, happily display their total and utter cluelessness with us. You're the ones making the western powers look like cavemen these days... Go back to Modern Warfare 3 or wherever you guys get the inspiration for your ignorant BS. Thankfully the US forces in general don't share your stupidity... Haven't been doing that for years btw... For a reason... And btw, pls don't join the armed forces... We don't need your tactical console fantasies against an enemy who excels at strategy... |
| LosTLocos User ID: 27226192 Malta11/13/2012 04:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you match up technology vs technology Iran has no chance...Literally no chance Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4428356 Iran - Possibly has the S300 surface to air missile system surrounding its nuclear developments America - Fy22 was designed to beat the newest S400 system. The Fy22 has flown against the S300 that a NATO counterpart has and destroyed it in every instance. Once air superiority is gained - game over. They will carve the country up into kill boxes, roll the carriers in and it will be good night sweet prince. Anyone that thinks Iran will be a challenge hasnt been paying attention to the chess pieces. On the flip side they will do damage to our interest in the region. "If you match up technology vs technology Iran has no chance" Of course they dont, and they know that... The U.S. has a huge problem coping with assymetric warfare, Vietnam being a classic example.. The Iranians aint stupid, they have geared most of their strategy towards assynetric warfare, i think the US will be in for some big (unpleasant) suprises if they do attack Iran. However, although you seem to dismiss their tech as way inferior, the US drone they managed to bring down intact says otherwise, this was no act of a technology deprived force... Problem is when the shit goes down they ain't gonna be no drones bombing Iran, but the real deal. Of course they may send some in as Iran is tied up trying to deal with the real fighter jets. And to an extent, yes the U.S could be looking at a dire situation if it tries to occupy Iran, but if they merely want to bomb the hell outta their infrastructure and leave them in ruins there's not much Iran can do about it and most of the destruction to the infrastructure will be done and over with before Russia or China can find the keys to its war machine. However, I agree if we go there to occupy then it could be as bad or worse than Vietnam. And doing so would allow the chinese n russians to show up in time to kick off ww3. Both scenarios would be very bad for all involved and diplmacy would be much better, but we know that ain't happening. Just using the drone example of their technical capabilities, i mean, who else could do that? and if they can land that drone, that was supposed to be THE lastest STEATH drone of the US, well, thats quite a feat, first of all they would have to detect it (which kinda puts the US F117 and B1 bombers into question) then hack into it, then somehow override the controls and land it... Sounds to me that they are more than ready for the "real deal" the S 300 AA system is nothing to be sniffed at, it would make mincemeat out of non steath aircraft and maybe steath as well judging how they managed to detect the steath drone.....just sayin.. Even if you are in a minority of one, the truth is still the truth. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 3694399 United States11/13/2012 04:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you match up technology vs technology Iran has no chance...Literally no chance Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4428356 Iran - Possibly has the S300 surface to air missile system surrounding its nuclear developments America - Fy22 was designed to beat the newest S400 system. The Fy22 has flown against the S300 that a NATO counterpart has and destroyed it in every instance. Once air superiority is gained - game over. They will carve the country up into kill boxes, roll the carriers in and it will be good night sweet prince. Anyone that thinks Iran will be a challenge hasnt been paying attention to the chess pieces. On the flip side they will do damage to our interest in the region. Good Night sweet prince? Like in Afghanistan almost a decade after the initial invasion? LOL Man, you seem to have NO CLUE what you are talking about... An attack on Iran would be the deadliest fault ever. It would cause WW3. LOL..WW3. Yes because China wants to scrap with its best trade partner. You think Russia wants to go it alone with us? Yea WW3...what are you smoking? Im pretty sure China could find other people who need toaster ovens etc after they bring us down. |
