OBAMA WON'T COMPROMISE ON EXTENDING CUTS FOR TOP 2% | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27690857 Australia 11/13/2012 05:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1528473 United States 11/13/2012 06:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Top 2% should be paying over 30% of their income in federal taxes, just like I do. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1684220 Fucking mooching lowlifes. I alraedy pay 36% just in Fed taxes, close to 45% in NYC So how much of my own money do I get to keep, ahole? You guys won't be happy until anyone earning over $100K pays 70% of their income in taxes, because we're the "rich" middle class yeah, because making over $200K in NYC or California makes you rich...lol, Meanwhile, the actual rich are laughing their asses at you, because they moved out of the country years ago the minute your messiah was elected guess they'll have to keep finding new pockets to pick until they are all reduced to struggling working class My messiah isn't even in the world. Furthermore, you're an idiot, since you and your measley 100K salary don't even put you in the top 60% moran. You think the super rich are laughing at me? No, no, dumb ass; they laugh at little dicks like you, who think you are rich with a 100K salary, LOL, and go about constantly defending the REAL super rich, as though they deserve special treatment. In other words, your a stupid republican. I'm not an Obama supporter and I'm not a Romney supporter. They both play on the same team, and you'd know that if you weren't such an idiot. I voted, yes, but it wasn't for either of these two peas in a pod. You're also an idiot to live in NYC, paying 46%, when you could live in a state that has no income tax. Frankly, I don't see how you manage to live in NYC only making 100K. Your bud Romney would only pay 13% even if he lived in NYC, but I'm sure you're fine with that. Idiot. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27304459 United States 11/13/2012 07:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27304459 United States 11/13/2012 07:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Top 2% should be paying over 30% of their income in federal taxes, just like I do. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1684220 Fucking mooching lowlifes. over %60 is required for a constant economy. they mega rich have many ways of offsetting tax anyway. A "constant economy" where the government takes such a huge cut of income? What do you have to back that up? |
Just Some Guy User ID: 1235825 United States 11/13/2012 08:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27627903 United States 11/13/2012 08:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27688172 United States 11/13/2012 08:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | For more enjoyment and greater efficiency, consumption is being standardized. We are sorry ... Let us be thankful we have an occupation to fill. Work hard, increase production, prevent accidents and be happy. Let us be thankful we have commerce. Buy more. Buy more now. Buy. And be happy. |
SilverPatriot User ID: 10518597 United States 11/13/2012 08:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Umm.. how is this even worthy of a post? There is no link to any actual article or evidence. And a tweet is not evidence in itself. You should have posted an article or something with substance. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1767782 Gonna have to call this one until I see some actual evidence. Below is a link for obama blathering than he will not extend tax cuts to the top 2% of high-income families. More importantly, the richer Americans are leaving the stock market, which will further cause job losses on top of the havoc of all the obamacare taxes foisted upon employers that currently is adversely impacting our job market we are steadily bleeding jobs. Obama holds onto "revenue" caveat in averting "fiscal cliff" On Friday, Mr. Obama said that while he's "open to compromise," he won't allow a deal to go through that extends the Bush-era tax cuts - set to expire at the end of the year - for the top two percent of high-income families. Both parties are scrambling to arrange a bargain before a series of tax increases and spending cuts go into effect Jan. 1, potentially hurling the United States into another recession. [link to www.cbsnews.com] Wealthy Dump Assets Amid Worries About Going Over 'Cliff' [link to www.cnbc.com] |
Saddletramp User ID: 736749 Puerto Rico 11/13/2012 09:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well since his definition of the top 2% is anybody making over $100,000 per year...which is actually the top 25%... Quoting: Saddletramp Fiscal Cliff in 5...4...3...2...1 Your numbers are wrong which is what makes your view incorrect. The top 11.8% earn 100k and the top 2% is the 160k+. Problem is this is an example of divide and conquer. We need to be taxing the FUCK out of certain millionaires. I know small business owners who pull in 2-3 million every year in revenue and are getting killed in payroll taxes. The small business owner that I described is far different then someone who manages 75+ food chains but are taxed the same and it kills TRUE small business. The entire system is rigged so the highest earners (5-65million a year) are extremely protected and you little guys on the totem pole are infighting as if the 50k 75k and 100k groups are at all different. It's pathetic because the tea party, OWS, and many other groups, were all on the right path of pointing out how fucked we all are by the simple fact that our gov is controlled by these powers and that all that has happened in the last decade has been planned out to push down the lower and middle class (soon to be just lower) and prop up the elite. The crash was a big ol reset on status AND lined CEOs pockets with million dollar bonuses to boot. These people are laughing at Americans who just can't seem to put the last pieces of the puzzle together. And Obama say's the "Top 2%", but then he says he wants to raise taxes on any one individual with GROSS Income of over $100,000... So it's more like the top 23.7%... And the HIGH Earners, as you Class Warriors like to call them, will just buy or trade for someone elses "Loss Carried Forward" to avoid the taxes anyway... What, you didn't understand that Corporations, PC's, LP's, and LLC's, could buy, sell, and trade their "Losses Carried Forward" from previous years taxes to and from other companies?!?!? Why do you think companies like Apple and GE paid basically $0.00 in taxes since 2008??? You think Obama is doing this for fairness, you think he's going to tax the corporations that put him into office??? Useful Idiot!!! Last Edited by Saddletramp on 11/13/2012 09:49 PM "And how can a man die better than facing fearful odds, for the ashes of his fathers, and the temples of his Gods..." ~ Horatius "Because he told the truth, and once you've heard the truth, everything else is just cheap whiskey..." "We don't rent pigs!" |
Saddletramp User ID: 736749 Puerto Rico 11/13/2012 09:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well since his definition of the top 2% is anybody making over $100,000 per year...which is actually the top 25%... Quoting: Saddletramp Fiscal Cliff in 5...4...3...2...1 I thought his income cutoff was more like 250K, which is more reasonable for top 2%. Oh no, he bailed on that right after 2008...Now it's any Individual or small business making $100,000 GROSS per year, or any couple making $200,000 GROSS... "And how can a man die better than facing fearful odds, for the ashes of his fathers, and the temples of his Gods..." ~ Horatius "Because he told the truth, and once you've heard the truth, everything else is just cheap whiskey..." "We don't rent pigs!" |