District prosecutor told me I was NOT "one of the people" as written in the Constitution.

You are a property of the state. Thats why your name always appears in all caps in any federal documemnt/database.

The constitution only pertains to signatories of the document

OK, nobody yet has answered.

Perhaps I should ask then, WHO ARE "We, the people" and how do I become one of them?

You already consenting because you signed a driver license dumbass

Vehicles are a different story when you have consented in their eyes with a driver license

I was walking when I didn't consent

WRONG.

You are a property of the state. Thats why your name always appears in all caps in any federal documemnt/database.

Are We the People we have been waiting for?

We hold the Bill of Rights,
And speak them.

We do not aquiess to questions.

If you believe you are something,
Then that is what you are.

She tricked your ass, simple like.

You did not object, or correct.

Speak law

Yes, this is specifically stated in the 14th amendment to the SECOND constitution. ...That a person born in a "State" is a SUBJECT of that State.

But, I was not born in the "US" as defined by statute - as Washington DC only) Nor was I born in the State in which I currently live.

So, I am not a subject, technically, but they ALWAYS assume that everybody IS.

I was charged with misdemeanor "obstructing a peace officer" for simple saying "I do not consent" and rolling up my window.

TRUST me, I know a LOT more about the system than you do. I spent 2 years full time reading all of the alternative law stuff and then one day, I decided to test it.

I took it in the ass.

All of you people are making a LOT of assumptions, but I am asking a simple question on a parallel subject.

Keep your assumptions and post INFORMATION.

Are We the People we have been waiting for?

We hold the Bill of Rights,
And speak them.

We do not aquiess to questions.

If you believe you are something,
Then that is what you are.

She tricked your ass, simple like.

You did not object, or correct.

Speak law

in your OP, you say "this was a traffic violation contest". i didnt make any assumptions, i went with the bullshit YOU provided. misdemeanor obstruction ISN'T a traffic violation, dickhead. so, how about this: pony up as much pertinent info as you can (like jurisdiction, actual code you were charged with, any additional charges you might have "neglected" to mention), and you might actually get some pertinent input. or maybe you thought fucking kreskin was going to respond to your post?

The constitution was written for "ourselves and our posterity".

That means THE DUDES WHO SIGNED IT AND THEIR HEIRS.

You are not nor ever were a party to it.

Rule #l

In their world a driver license = CONSENT

Rule #2

Talk to a statute enforcer is CONSENT

Rule #3

There is NO CONSENT unless there is FULL DISCLOSURE

There has never been full disclosure which means their system is NULL & VOID

The constitution was written for "ourselves and our posterity".

That means THE DUDES WHO SIGNED IT AND THEIR HEIRS.

You are not nor ever were a party to it.

It was a traffic stop. I refused to consent and was hauled in. The misdemeanor ("criminal") charge was added later by overzealous prosecutors.

So, try to refrain from injecting your ego into the discussion.

Yes. I believe this, so WHY is everybody told that it applies to them... and then one fat, sweaty prosecutor lets the cat out of the bag?

People keep saying this, but I keep saying: Test your theories and see haw far you get.

If one of you is David Merril, why don't you tell them how you have to BIKE everywhere in the snow?

Trust me, I did. I was SHUSHED and railroaded and I persisted LOUDLY, even quoting a SPJ who said that "right's belong only to one who demands them..." etc.

You people are STILL assuming many things about what I did or did not do.

Answer the original question and keep your ASSumptions in your asses.

You signed a driver license

You already consented

Drive without a license

It's better for your health

"The People" does not include you and me. (Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore. 32 U.S. 243). Check it before you wreck it. Condemnation before investigation, is the highest level of ignorance.

That makes perfect sense, but then WHY are all Americans raised to believe that they ARE a party to that document?

Eh?

Keep in mind that I have read EVERY strawman, freeman, redemption etc. piece of material that exists.

ALL of it.

It does not work in court, because the fascist system will just tune you out or shush you and proceed to the end (you, screwed) without allowing anything on the record.


Now, I want to see official documents that address my first question: Who are "the people" and why am I not one of them.

I can understand that I did not sign the Constitution, but then WHAT THE FUCK do we have state Constitutions for?

This is the one I was told I was not a party to.