Global warming not real? What about this?

It is effects of climate change (as your links states) not global warming. The fact is that this planet and 7 others with a planetoid are warming up. This did not happen because I drove to work.

You want to pay carbon tax go ahead write a check to Al Gore. I'm not paying a dime.

Yes I would agree the climate is changing and its not from Carbon.

"Climate change makes all kinds of extreme storms worse, like the unusual snowfall that buried parts of Romania under 15 feet of snow in February 2012."

What a fucking con game. Any time the weather isn't average, they screech "you're killing the planet!".

We live in a closed environment. It was in a perfect balance until we developed certain technologies. Where do you think all the carbon, floro carbon, exhaust etc goes? We have wrecked the equilibrium. It foolish to think we can burn without an effect.

If you are going to talk science, try to be accurate please. What are they afraid of?

It IS real, what's not is that we caused it. Things are just heating up.

Go back to sleep!

What 'certain' technology was developed 5-23 million years ago???

The climate during the Miocene was similar to today's climate, but warmer. Well-defined climatic belts stretched from Pole to Equator, however, there were palm trees and alligators in England and Northern Europe. Australia was less arid than it is now [link to scotese.com]

During the Oligocene, ice covered the South Pole but not the North Pole. Warm Temperate forests covered northern Eurasia and North America.

Global cliimate during the Late Eocene was warmer than today. Ice had just begun to form at the South Pole. India was covered by tropical rainforests, and Warm Temperate forests covered much of Austrlia [link to scotese.com]

This information is easy to find, I guess it is easy to ignore too.

Ha ha ha. I live close to that river. You're really retarded to think it has to do with warming planet...

Just as it is foolish to think that changing our closed environment with pollutants will have no effect, it is just as foolish to think the climate wouldn't change on its own.

lets look at it on a smaller scale. If you have a balloon with a cigarette burning in it What do you think happens to the air quality. Depends on the size of balloon and number of cigarettes.

The settlers of the old west had the same ignorant thought process while killing the bison. They thought there are too many bison to ever have an effect.

Or adding food color to a swimming pool. Only our pool deosn't have fresh water coming in. We are adding a drop of dye one at a time. Our pool is changing color.

The benefits of carbon dioxide supplementation on plant growth and production within the greenhouse environment have been well understood for many years. [link to www.omafra.gov.on.ca]

A greenhouse is a closed system

CO2 increases plant growth (assume plant take up more CO2)

Larger, healthier plants produce more seeds

More seed means more plants to take up more CO2

The result is the closed system comes into balamce.

Unless all the buffalo were killed, the remaining will multiply to the extent their food source allows.

Your dye analogy is false because dye is foreign to that system, CO2 is natural to the earth's system. We don't create more CO2, our use of fossil fuel releases CO2 BACK into the enviroment.

No charge for the science lesson, things you should have learned in third grade

Last Edited by Real list on 11/15/2012 10:46 AM

that's YOU who should do that

at least THAT ac is thinking, instead of swallowing full on lies, hook line and sinker.

look at this bullshit..

[link to www.bbc.co.uk]

'Resistance to antibiotics is one of the greatest threats to modern health, experts say.

The warning from England's chief medical officer and the Health Protection Agency comes amid reports of growing problems with resistant strains of bugs such as E. coli and gonorrhoea.

They said many antibiotics were being used unnecessarily for mild infections, helping to create resistance.

And they urged patients to take more care with how they used medicines.

This is particularly important as there are very few new antibiotics in development.
'Alarming'

The chief medical officer, Prof Dame Sally Davies, said: "Antibiotics are losing their effectiveness at a rate that is both alarming and irreversible - similar to global warming.'

why even SAY that? it isn't your field, and has sweet FUCK all to do with the subject matter, you stupid bitch!

the pro GW agenda is hitting ridiculous lows now.