Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,684 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 116,955
Pageviews Today: 175,788Threads Today: 46Posts Today: 1,130
01:36 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

How humans are not physically created to eat meat

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28054307
United States
11/19/2012 08:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
op you never addressed the weston a price foundation which has helped a lot of people heal from disease. do you purposefully ignore whatever doesn't suit your argument?
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 4901221
Australia
11/20/2012 05:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
there has been a few intelligent people reply to this thread but on the whole the majority of the replies remind me of an old saying:
YOU CAN LEED A MAN TO WATER BUT YOU CANT MAKE HIM THINK!
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 4901221
Australia
11/20/2012 05:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
there has been a few intelligent people reply to this thread but on the whole the majority of the replies remind me of an old saying:
YOU CAN LEAD A MAN TO WATER BUT YOU CANT MAKE HIM THINK!
ANHEDONIC

User ID: 26795689
United States
11/20/2012 05:59 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
If you want to know what we are supposed to eat by nature, just watch the diet of animals that are close to us. Orang Utans don't eat meat.

Now, a carnivore would argue that we are weak and would have a disadvantage if we don't eat meat. Ok... Tell that to the silver back alpha orang utan... He's a herbivore... All the strongest animals are herbivores... Elephants, Hippos, Bears ....
 Quoting: •••Weltschmerz•••


Bears are herbivores??? Whats it called when they are fishing salmon/trout out of the rivers? Or when the polar bears eat seals?

Lions not among your list of strongest animals?

Last Edited by ANHEDONIC on 11/20/2012 06:01 AM

"You will not be punished for your anger, you will be punished by your anger"
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 4901221
Australia
11/28/2012 06:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28616258
United States
11/28/2012 07:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
actually op, it's a compelling argument, food for thought. One more for you, vitamin b12 absorption is difficult for celiacs. your theory on vegetarianism presents special challenges for those who cannot eat certain grains. I shall think on it though, and perhaps experiment. I will let you know.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15722489
Australia
11/28/2012 07:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
is a kangaroo a herbivore ? you probably think and are taught that they are yes ?.......wrong! hand a roo a sausage cooked on the bbq and that fucker will hoe that shit down quicker than u can blink , yet it does not hunt meat to eat .
Alot of animals that u think are herbivores will actually jump at the chance to scoff down meat if given the chance , this includes bears , birds , insects , crustaceans and yes monkeys too !! some monkeys will actually hunt down other packs of monkeys and eat them and their babies so not only are they both herbivore and omnivore they practice cannibalism aswell !!!!
What about the praying mantis ? the female bites off the head of the male after mating with him .
Things arnt always black and white there are many shades in between so to say an anmimal only eats this or that is very naive.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20574169
United States
11/28/2012 08:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
Nice copy paste. +1
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9222520
United States
11/28/2012 10:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
"Humans: have intestinal tract 10-12 times their body length."

Last I checked, the average human has a small intestine of around 22-23 feet. And a large intestine of 4-6 feet.

At most, we have intestines 6-8x our body length of intestines.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 905924
United States
11/28/2012 10:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
Animals are tasty.
aliensbro

User ID: 27403091
United States
11/28/2012 10:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
Quote "Even bears that are omnivores eat salmon raw."

+1 For the implication that bears can cook.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 4901221
Australia
02/11/2013 12:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
bump
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 4901221
Australia
02/11/2013 12:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20680916
02/11/2013 04:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
The original command was:

"And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it..." Gen 2:16-17

Then came Jehovah and he reject gifts from harvest but instead wanted meat as offering.

He was addicted to smell of slaughtered animal and what's worst, he ordered slaughter of whole human tribes.
Varl

User ID: 33432076
Australia
02/12/2013 02:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
I'd say your a vegetarian that wants to try and prove there way is better then eating meat just because you do it, the reason may be you just want to show people its better your way in your mind, meat is good for us we need nutrients in meat..

If your on a strictly vegetarian diet you'll need supplement pills to keep you healthy or else you may have some bad major health troubles in life..

Having long intestines is good no matter what you are (herbivore carnivore) it means you can get a lot more out of it before its completely past through.

It doesn't matter even if we were once herbivores as long as we can eat meat and it helps, which it does a lot, eat a variety of foods, grains, meats, vegetables and fruits. (I'll stick to my almost all meat diet though)
Varl was here.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 4901221
Australia
03/17/2013 10:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28948108
United States
03/17/2013 11:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
If you want to know what we are supposed to eat by nature, just watch the diet of animals that are close to us. Orang Utans don't eat meat.

Now, a carnivore would argue that we are weak and would have a disadvantage if we don't eat meat. Ok... Tell that to the silver back alpha orang utan... He's a herbivore... All the strongest animals are herbivores... Elephants, Hippos, Bears ....
 Quoting: •••Weltschmerz•••


[link to www.motherjones.com]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 4901221
Australia
05/18/2013 02:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
If you're like me (at least a bit), you like
a good burger now and then.

I love them too, but what I found out about them recently
is just disturbing, disgusting and downright angering.

Do you know that the burgers we buy from supermarkets
are basically health bombs?

Wait, I'm not talking from a "health foods expert" perspective,
but from a "I'd like to stay alive perspective".

Beef burgers, for example, don't only contain beef,
but it's made from a paste obtained by mixing
many types of meat and parts of an animal's body,
including the digestive tract, excretory system and
so on, which are packed with bacteria.

Bacteria that doesn't die if you only cook the burger,
but you should downright burn it.

But it gets "better". Inside beef there's poop. Consistent and
consecutive tests showed that, on average, 2/3
of all beef burgers contain e-coli,
which is a bacteria found in feces.

Of course, this bacteria shouldn't be in your stomach and
e-coli is on top of the list of bad things that might
make its way to your stomach.

Not to mention it's just very disgusting as well!


Burgers are also packed with antibiotics (fed to animals
to "stay healthy"), but also with salmonella,
enterococcus and other goodies, that
developed immunity to the antibiotics
put in them to kill them.

And all of that goes into our bellies.

So what can you do? Source your own food, grow it,
only buy it from someone you trust.

Better yet, eat less. Be prepared. They're poisoning us every second
and we have the power to stop it all by not buying
all that crap (quite literally) anymore.

and dont forget to buy burger mince unsubsidized would set you back around $80 a pound!
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 4901221
Australia
05/18/2013 04:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
bump
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 4901221
Australia
05/23/2013 02:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
bump
Judethz
Israel is Eternal

User ID: 40340767
United Kingdom
05/23/2013 02:38 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
cow Hamburgers...................................good.
coderedoc

User ID: 40327933
India
05/23/2013 02:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
nothing is physically created for anything. You weren't physically created to drive cars either.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30966993
United States
05/23/2013 02:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34332770
United States
05/23/2013 02:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
HEY MOTHERFUCKERS WE'RE LIVING THINGS TOO! - yours sincerely , The plants

broccoli
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 4901221
Australia
05/23/2013 03:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
The report released today by the world's leading climate scientists made no bones about it: global warming is happening in a big way and it is very likely man-made. So, if we are indeed the bulk of the problem, we ought to step up and start doing things differently. Now.

My last post ("Vegetarian Is the New Prius") got a lot of traction, and I think it's because there is a realization that being "part of the solution" can be a whole lot simpler -and cheaper - than going out and buying a new car. We can make a huge difference in the environment by eating a plant based diet instead of an animal based one. Factory farming pollutes our air and water, reduces the rainforests, and goes a long way to create global warming. And although the vast majority of responses to the piece were positive, there were some environmentalists for whom the idea of giving up those chicken nuggets was impossible to swallow.

My favorite movie of last year was Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth (Al Gore for the Nobel Peace Prize!), but I have to admit that when I speak with environmentalists about the obvious waste and pollution involved in the totally unnecessary activity of meat consumption, I feel a lot like Mr. Gore trying to convince the U.S. Congress to take the issue of global warming seriously during his first term in the Congress. I thought I might discuss a few of the key concerns that were posted to the blog and that my meat-eating friends offer in defense of their continued meat consumption. So here we go:

Some were worried about thriving, physically, on a vegetarian diet.

Now this just does not make sense. Half of all Americans die of heart disease or cancer and two-thirds of us are overweight. The American Dietetic Association says that vegetarians have "lower rates of death from ischemic heart disease; ... lower blood cholesterol levels, lower blood pressure, and lower rates of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and prostate and colon cancer." Vegetarians, on average, are about one-third as likely to be overweight as meat-eaters.


And I've just learned from the brilliant Dr. Andrew Weil that there is something called arachidonic acid, or AA, in animal flesh which causes inflammation. AA is a pro-inflammatory fatty acid. He explains that "heart disease and Alzheimer's - among many other diseases - begin as inflammatory processes. The same hormonal imbalance that increases inflammation increases cell proliferation and the risk of malignant transformation." They are finding out that inflammation is key in so many of the diseases that plague us. So when you eat meat, you ingest AA, which causes inflammation, which fires up the disease process. It doesn't matter if the chicken is free range or the beef is grass-fed because the fatty acid is natural and inherent in the meat.

As for having strength and energy on a vegetarian diet, some of the world's top athletes are vegetarian. A few examples: Carl Lewis (perhaps the greatest Olympian of all time), Robert Parish (one of the "50 Greatest Players in NBA History"), Desmond Howard (Heisman Trophy winner and Super Bowl MVP), Bill Pearl (professional bodybuilder and four-time "Mr. Universe"), Jack La Lanne (Mr. Fitness himself) and Chris Evert (tennis champion). Vegetarian athletes have the advantage of getting all the plant protein, complex carbohydrates and fiber they need without all the artery-clogging cholesterol and saturated animal fats found in meat that would slow them down. In fact, Carl Lewis says that "my best year of track competition was the first year I ate a vegan diet."

One response pointed out that the rain forest is being cut down to grow soy, not meat.

Actually, much of the rain forest is being chopped down for grazing, but also yes, the rain forest is being chopped down to grow soy--but not for human consumption. Americans and Europeans can't raise all the feed domestically that is needed to sustain their meat addictions, so agribusiness has started cutting down the rain forest. Ask Greenpeace or any other environmental group and they'll tell you that the overwhelming majority of soy (or corn or wheat, for that matter) is used to feed animals in factory farms. In fact, Greenpeace recently unveiled a massive banner over an Amazon soy field that read, "KFC-Amazon Criminal," to accentuate the point that large chicken and other meat companies like KFC are responsible for the destruction of the Amazon. It takes many pounds of soy or other plant foods to produce just 1 pound of animal flesh--so if you're worried about the rain forests being chopped down for grazing or to grow soy, your best move is to stop eating chickens, pigs, and other animals. If more people went vegetarian, we would need far less land to feed people, and we wouldn't have to destroy the few natural places that this world has left.

Some wondered about humane, organic, or kosher meat.

Sadly, most of the meat, egg, and dairy companies that pretend to be eco- or animal-friendly, with packages covered in pictures of pretty red barnyards, are basically the same massive corporately owned factory-farms but with a newly hired advertising consultant. In fact, labels like "Swine Welfare" and "UEP Certified" are simply the industry labels that attempt to hide the horrible abuse involved in these products' production. And even "organic" farms are industrializing in ways that shock the journalists who bother to investigate. Sadly, "kosher" means nothing when it comes to how animals are treated on farms, and the largest kosher slaughterhouse in North America was caught horribly abusing animals--ripping the tracheas out of live cows' throats and worse--and defending the abuse as kosher.

All that said, it's undeniable that the rare meat-eater who limits him- or herself to a bit of grass-fed cattle flesh on occasion is making a much smaller environmental impact than the vast majority of Americans. But when you consider that no reputable scientific or medical body believes that eating animals is good for us, let alone necessary, one has to wonder about environmentalists who insist on consuming products that we know to be resource-intensive and polluting (even if they're less resource intensive and polluting than some other similar options or eaten in "moderation"). It'd be like driving an SUV that gets 15 mpg rather than 10, or driving an SUV three days per week instead of seven. Sure, it might be better for the environment, but with so many more fuel-efficient ways to get from A to B, there's no need to drive any SUV at all. Eating meat--any meat--is the same thing: With so many healthy vegetarian options that are kinder and far more eco-friendly than even the "best" meat products, there's just no good justification for someone who claims to be an environmentalist--or to oppose cruelty--for doing it.

Some worry about 'preachy' or 'judgmental' or 'extreme' vegetarians.

And some consider the very choice to be a vegetarian to be extreme. Although I certainly don't like radical-in-your-face messages, the truth is that sometimes it's the only thing that seems to wrench us out of our slumber. I know it worked with me when I saw one of the slaughterhouse videos--definitely not pleasant, but it got my attention.


The very nature of progressive movements throughout history is to tell others to stop doing something harmful or degrading (e.g., using humans as slaves, sexually harassing women, forcing children to work in sweatshops, harming the environment, etc). Yes, the abolitionists, suffragists, feminists, and civil rights activists were called extreme, and similarly, some vegetarians are called extreme. But maybe it's just because vegetarianism is not yet a cultural norm. Old habits - and appetites - die hard, and there is usually a lot of resistance before things change. I'm a southern gal and I loved my chicken fried steak like no other. I didn't want to give up the joys of Sunday BBQ or chicken wings with my friends on a Friday night. I get it; I understand. But still, if we are to continue evolving - physically, emotionally, and spiritually -we really do have to look at how our dinner choices affect not only the environment, but even more importantly, the well-being (or intense suffering) of other creatures. So yes, on the one hand, the move to eating a plant based diet may look extreme because most people don't do it. But on the other hand, we can still have our BBQ (soy dogs and veggie burgers) and feel good about it.

I do feel strongly that vegetarians should not play into the self righteous stereotypes, that we should not be shrill or judgmental, of course, but that doesn't require silence; it simply requires patience and decorum.

A few people asked about meat in the developing world, or meat for Eskimos or Inuit.

If you are an Eskimo or you're living in sub-Saharan Africa and you're reading this blog, I'm not going to begrudge you your pound of flesh; it would be silly of me to do so. But if you're reading this in a developed country where almost all animals are eating animal feed rather than grazing, are factory-farmed rather than living with families or hunted, and you have abundant vegetarian options all around you, talk of people who have limited food options doesn't apply to you.

Some people worried that it's hard to be a vegetarian.

Being vegetarian isn't exactly the supreme sacrifice―surfing around the food pics on any vegetarian cooking site will show you that. Vegetarian and vegan food is everywhere (even Burger King has a veggie burger!). Most, if not all, major grocery stores carry soy milk, mock meats ("chicken" nuggets, BBQ "ribs," burgers, soy "sausage," etc.), vegan cheeses, and soy ice cream. If you can't find what you want at the store, most will order it for you. Many restaurants have veggie options a-plenty (especially Thai, Indian, Ethiopian, Mexican, and other ethnic restaurants--which are my favorite anyway). Sure, some vegetarians may prefer not to eat food that was cooked on the same grill as meat, but I'm not concerned about that (it does not cause more animals to suffer or more environmental harm). You can find great vegetarian recipes at www.VegCooking.com.

Although not responses to my "New Prius" post, I'd also like to address the top five most common things that I hear from meat-eaters regarding their meat consumption:

Number five: 'Humans have always eaten animals--it's natural.'


First, our evolution in human morality is marked almost entirely by our attempt to move beyond the "might makes right" law of the jungle. It may indeed be "natural" for the powerful to dominate the weak--but that doesn't mean we should support it.

Second, human bodies aren't meant to eat meat. It's always seemed strange to me that we're the only species on Earth that has to cook flesh in order to eat it without getting sick. Look at our bodies: We're just not meant to eat flesh. Like all herbivores, almost all of our teeth are flat and blunt (the mouths of carnivores and omnivores are full of sharp incisors). Like all herbivores, our intestines are looooong (carnivores and omnivores have short intestines so they can get the rotting flesh they eat out quickly). We don't have sharp claws to seize and hold down prey. The list goes on. We may have had a need to eat meat thousands of years ago, in times of scarcity as hunter-gatherers, but we don't need to now, and we'll be better off if we don't. Dr William C. Roberts, M.D., editor of the American Journal of Cardiology, says, "Although we think we are one, and we act as if we are one, human beings are not natural carnivores. When we kill animals to eat them, they end up killing us, because their flesh, which contains cholesterol and saturated fat, was never intended for human beings, who are natural herbivores." Check out this essay by Dr. Milton Mills for more information on the issue of whether the human physiology is designed for meat consumption.

Most critically, the people who say this generally use it to justify buying the same old meat that comes from giant, wholly unnatural factory farms where animals are crammed into filthy sheds or cages and not allowed to do anything natural to them--at all, ever (breathe fresh air, bask in the sun, raise their young, dustbathe, form social orders, etc.). Chickens in the egg industry have half their beaks cut off, piglets in the pork industry have their tails cut off, etc. (please take 10 minutes to watch the video at www.Meat.org). This is how 99 percent of chickens and turkeys, 95 percent of pigs and eggs, and most cow flesh and dairy products end up on our plates.

Lastly, if you care so much about being "natural," then think for a moment about the harm that you're doing to your natural environment by eating meat--any meat. At the end of the day, for me, we don't need to eat meat, we'll be better off without it, and it causes animals to suffer.

Number four: 'Animals are not equal to humans, so we should not be so concerned about them.'

I disagree with Princeton Professor Peter Singer on many issues, but on this one I think he gets it precisely right. Writes Dr. Singer, "[W]hen non-vegetarians say that 'human problems come first,' I cannot help wondering what exactly it is that they are doing for human beings that compels them to continue to support the wasteful, ruthless exploitation of farm animals." Which is to say: Fine, don't spend any time at all on animal issues, but please don't pay other people to abuse animals, which is what you are doing when you buy chicken, pork, or other animal products. And remember: A vegetarian diet is also the best diet for the planet, so eat as though the planet depended on it, since it just might.

Number three: 'There have been many brilliant meat-eaters, like Picasso and Mozart, so they could not have been wrong.'

I highly doubt that anyone is going to suggest that vegetarians Steve Jobs, Leonardo da Vinci, Pythagoras, Albert Einstein, Leo Tolstoy, or Mohandas Gandhi were especially brilliant because they were vegetarians, and I also don't think one can make the argument that meat-eaters attained their great heights as a result of their diet. Interestingly, studies show that vegetarians are smarter than meat-eaters, but there is probably not causality there--it's probably just that thoughtful people tend to question things more deeply, hence the decision to become vegetarian. Here's a 2006 study from the British Medical Journal about vegetarians being smarter than meat-eaters.

Number two: 'Where do you draw the line? Should we protect insects? What's the difference between killing plants and killing animals? They're all alive.'

The theologian and Narnia inventor C.S. Lewis staunchly opposed testing on animals on Christian grounds, and he pointed out to those who asked this question that the question is baseless--they already know and understand the differences between plants and animals. To whit, every reader will recoil in horror if asked to imagine lighting a cat on fire or beating a dog's head in with a baseball bat--because we know that these things cause the animals pain. But none of us feels similarly at the prospect of pulling weeds or mowing our lawn--because we know that weeds and lawns have no capacity to feel pain. Chickens, pigs, fish, and cattle all feel pain in the same way and to the same degree as any dog or cat. Just watch their faces and their body language in these undercover videos; listen to their animal versions of screaming. I assure you, grass does not suffer like these poor creatures do.

I'm not so sure about insects, though I try to give them the benefit of the doubt whenever possible. Yes, when I walk down the street, I'm sure I step on bugs. But does the fact that I can't stop all cruelty mean that I shouldn't bother to stop a lot of it? Of course not. That'd be like saying that if you drive a car, you shouldn't even bother to recycle.

And the number one justification for eating meat is: 'Meat won't kill me, and I like it.'

No question―this is the crux of it all, the only purely honest answer if you ask me. Sure enough, unless you get really bad food poisoning from your next piece of undercooked chicken or choke to death on a piece of steak, meat won't kill you right away. But chances are pretty good that eating meat could reduce your life span (and quality) in the long run. I imagine the fact that we're not designed to eat meat (as I discussed above) may explain the fact that the American Dietetic Association (the overarching group of nutrition researchers, doctors, etc.) says that vegetarians have lower rates of heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and obesity than do meat-eaters. Some argue that for every study, there's another that says the opposite, but that's simply not so in this case--there isn't a single reputable scientific or medical body that disagrees with the simple fact that vegetarians are a fraction as likely to be overweight and much less likely to suffer from heart disease and cancer. Really, even if I didn't give a hoot about animal suffering or environmental degradation, I would still be vegetarian because the diet is the best diet for my health. And as noted, eating meat does support cruelty to animals and environmental degradation, all for the sake of a palate preference (which, by the way, can be largely satisfied by the luscious faux meat options out there).

Concluding thoughts:

One thing about being a vegetarian that is often missed is how empowering it is. Personally, I think that integrity of action requires that among other things, we attempt to lead lives that are as compassionate and conscious as possible. What this means to me, personally, is that if there is something that I would not want to do myself, I don't feel good paying someone else to do it on my behalf. So I don't inflict suffering or kill animals myself; and I don't support the market of killing by buying these poor animals chopped up and shrink-wrapped in the grocery store either.

We are a nation of animal lovers, and we all cringe in horror when we hear about cases like a dog being burned alive or tossed into freeway traffic. But chickens and pigs and other animals also deserve our compassion. They are all smart animals who feel pain and fear, yet they are treated just horribly, and sadly, there are no laws to protect them. Don't take my word for it, watch Alec Baldwin's "Meet Your Meat" and see for yourself what goes on.

We oppose sweatshops and child labor, and we cringe at the thought of children laboring in developing countries. But American slaughterhouses are sweatshops. They employ people working illegally who can't defend themselves out of fear of being deported. Conditions in these places are so bad that the average annual turnover rate for slaughter-line workers is out of sight. Check out the Web site of this labor organization to learn about its fight against Smithfield Foods (the world's largest pork and turkey producer--it owns Butterball).

We are environmentalists, and we cringe when see a bright yellow Hummer in the grocery store parking lot. But as bad as the amount of fuel that a Hummer uses or the amount of greenhouse gasses that it emits is, if we're eating meat, we're making a conscious decision that is even more wasteful and polluting. In addition to my "New Prius" piece, check out this E magazine article by the magazine's editor, "The Case Against Meat," or this Grist.com article, "How Poultry Producers Are Ravaging the Rural South," as just a few examples.

Americans and Europeans eat meat because we want to, not because we have to. And we do it at the expense of animals, people, and the environment.

This may be inconvenient, but I am convinced that it's the truth.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24929946
United States
05/23/2013 03:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
Who needs claws when you have slaughterhouses.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 39600907
Australia
05/23/2013 03:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
Eat meat when hurt from work - it fixes me quickly and properly. Eat fruit and carbohydrates (not carefully watched though), they don't help. Eat only fruit/carbohydrates/soy products, I start to decline in health.

A tiny amount of meat or fish is worth a lot of vegetarian in terms of human rehabilitation. This is my personal experience reinforced over decades.

Very difficult moral/truth dilemma.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 38971256
United Kingdom
05/23/2013 03:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
the worlds oldest recorded man was Habib Mian who died in 2008, he was 138 years old and he claimed he was vegetarian for 120 years of his life! exsplain that one!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4901221

oh well there you go, if you're vegetarian, you are GUARANTEED to live to 138 because that one guy did!!!
putin
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26102938


haha. certainly doesnt appear to increase IQ


nobody who eats meat makes threads telling vegetable-heads what to eat


why? because we dont feel the need to, unlike vegetable-heads

veggie tards exhibiting hitler-like qualities. quelle surprise
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 40342085
Greece
05/23/2013 03:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
...and yet we have canine teeth and, like other predators, forward facing eyes. Also, one of the theories as to our rapid development of 'bigger brain', was that our ancestors (the ones who didn't come about by intelligent design, that is), started eating bone marrow which helped facilitate a more rapid evolution.


Personally, I think we are omnivorous, but with a predisposition to consuming more plant matter. You think back to our hunter-gatherer days, we'd have found a lot more berries, etc, than meat, fish, etc. but as a species, we'd almost certainly have been opportunistic in our choice of food.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 40267058
Canada
05/23/2013 03:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How humans are not physically created to eat meat
omgosh
... wow ... omgomg
here it is ... here you are ... there it is ...

Thank you ...
although this is the beginng of the path to the right way ...

although; i don't think the answer is in vegetarianism , fruitarianism or liquitarianism ... I think it is more towards the path of breatharianism and sun-charging.

Do we have enough spirit-power to break the generational carnivorous karma to follow the right path... (carnality to divinity)

News