""""""""""""""Sounds like you support the issue, you just feel it was approached in the wrong manner. Sounds like you think his educational background would be the better way to expose something, if that something is there. Honestly that still puts you in the same boat as Donald Trump since his last offer wasn't asking for a bc, but rather college transcripts, etc. Kinda puts you on the same ship as the birthers, just maybe a different deck.

If so, you pretty much missed the point too. The man is legitimate, get over it. We don't have to agree with his policies, we don't have to agree with his take on issues, but to continually question whether he is legitimately the POTUS is idiotic at best.

I see you didn't include the part about the role opposition research plays in a campaign. That is the crux of my opinion. If there were no opposition research, then you would be right, who knows anything about anybody other than what they say about themselves............"""""""""""""""

------------------------------------------​----------------
THANKS for an intelligent thoughtful answer to my post.
Unfortunately we are missing each others points.

""""Sounds like you think his educational background would be the better way to expose something,""""

That is not my train of thought--expose--ill leave that to others.My point is this is the man i voted for in 08-had enough of Bush--and i voted in good faith.

Now i just feel that i would like to know more about that person i voted for once and for all-so return the vote of faith by showing the other side --not the side all were jumping on.Why hide it? and thanks again for you response.









'''