| Users Online Now: 1,363 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 301,872 | |
| Pageviews Today: 401,688 | Threads Today: 123 | Posts Today: 1,810 |
| 03:26 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,363 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 301,872 | |
| Pageviews Today: 401,688 | Threads Today: 123 | Posts Today: 1,810 |
| 03:26 AM | ||
NewCrazy "Insider Information" regarding the GENERAL and HIS truth!! | |
| KenTx2011 Offer Upgrade  User ID: 26295520  United States11/16/2012 04:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| KenTx2011 (OP) User ID: 26295520 United States11/16/2012 04:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ***Snip*** UM: Impeachment? Is that really possible? RI: Don’t use…don’t latch onto that term. I’m not saying it’s likely or even possible. I don’t have all the specifics of exactly what went on in the hearing. I can tell you the place is buzzing. I can tell you there are staffers…King’s office…they are really getting pretty fired up on this. They needed Petraeus to give them something and apparently that’s what the general did. Oh! And over at…ummm…McCain. He’s fired up about this too. He did not like being called out by the president the other day. So maybe he’s going to…you know the Senate…they always take so long and the Republicans up there…(inaudible) so cautious. But (inaudible) …and so maybe we are seeing some real momentum on this. The Feinstein office has sent out feelers too. Staffers talking amongst themselves. This is all good news for those of us who want to see some real accountability for what happened, but…I want to stress again that…that you can’t get your hopes up. These people…it’s not that they don’t care…(inaudible)…bad people. It’s just how it works. If someone gets spooked, or a deal can be made, that’s what happens. I don’t like it, but I have to work in reality and not how I wish things were. You get that? RI: Here is…umm…there is something you can do. Your readers can do…everyone you know of. If people want to possibly change the outcome…or the discussion…they have to use this new media to do it. You have to understand that the Obama White House has hundreds of people…all they do is post and comment and try to push their version. They…what it is…it’s a whole program to either direct the news coverage, or give media the excuse that they are just reporting on…or reflecting the public opinion. So what we need to do…(inaudible)…of what I already talked about. We need to get ahead of this new media thing…all of us. Republicans. Conservatives…whatever. Congressman Paul talked about it the other day…he was right about that. 100%. So everyone needs to go out there and post their comments. Make the media know we are more…ummm…we are paying attention now. And so…they need to cover what…the stories that we are commenting on. Use basic economics on them. Just go all out and overwhelm the comments sections of these stories. Share the truth. And demand…demand more of the truth. And demand that they start…they need to ask this White House real questions now. Can you do that? Can they do that? Petraeus gave us an opportunity – now we need all of your help. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1711362  Canada11/16/2012 04:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 14518086 United States11/16/2012 05:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| KenTx2011 (OP) User ID: 26295520 United States11/16/2012 05:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| KenTx2011 (OP) User ID: 26295520 United States11/16/2012 05:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| KenTx2011 (OP) User ID: 26295520 United States11/16/2012 05:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Patch User ID: 26085824 United States11/16/2012 05:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is big news. Valerie Jarrett no doubt ordered the change. She is Obama's handler. The intelligence report was changed by the White House for political reasons to aid a political campaign. National security was subordinated to political benefit. Rice was sent out to lie to the lapdog press, which has not even been covering the story. They have tried to hide the story and aid Obama (e.g. Candy Crowley). Crowley should be fired and never work as a journalist in this country again. This is evidence that the Obama White House will subordinate the lives of American patriots to political convenience. This is evidence the White House does not put American national security interests ahead of their political agenda. The intelligence community can never trust the Obama White House again, never. The military cannot trust the Obama White House ever again, ever. We can never trust the liberal media again, ever. |
| KenTx2011 (OP) User ID: 26295520 United States11/16/2012 05:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This information just goes with all the rest of the untold facts about the whole Bengazi thing... How terrible, that those 4 people lost their lives and all the white house can do is lie about what really happened. If were my husband, or child, I wouldn't stop until I knew the truth. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 11691423 United States11/16/2012 05:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to theulstermanreport.com] Quoting: KenTx2011 ***Snip*** RI: The general opened up the…the “can of worms” this morning. We now have a four star general and CIA Director letting lawmakers know that there was serious alterations to the CIA summary of the Benghazi attack. All references to it being a terrorist attack were…they were removed from the original CIA document. Now I am left asking where is that original document. If that was provided by the general, and it’s being reviewed by the committee, then that committee has no choice but to go right back to the White House and ask…it’s the two questions everybody is already asking right now. I’ve been hearing it all morning and afternoon now. WHY was it changed? WHO changed it? UM: Who would have the authority to do that? To alter the CIA Director’s assessment, right? RI: Exactly – exactly. Who could do that? Has to be high up. Administration. And whoever did that, how…who would do that without the president’s stamp? Without his approval? Now I was…I heard from a staffer…they said it was the campaign. The campaign reviewed it and changed it and sent Rice out onto the Sunday news shows. That sounds…well, it’s outrageous. But…it…all of the campaigning the president was doing…has been…he’s been at it for over two years. The campaing has always been his priority. So…so maybe that’s possible. Now that’s not a minor point here. If national security…the death of an ambassador and three other Americans…now if that…(inaudible)…so if there was a decision from the campaign, then…well…I’ll say it. That could be cause for impeachment. The president would be in violation of his oath. At least it’s how I understand it. Holly Crap!!! The General did lay it out there didn't he? I am proudd he did it. It has been smelling like White House was in this all along to avoid any campaign problems. This info really make sense. Makes many things much more clear. Now we will see who they through under the bus next.  Or who ends up missing or worse. IT's going to happen before Obummer goes down others will. The four in Lybia were the first. |
| KenTx2011 (OP) User ID: 26295520 United States11/16/2012 05:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is big news. Valerie Jarrett no doubt ordered the change. She is Obama's handler. Quoting: Patch The intelligence report was changed by the White House for political reasons to aid a political campaign. National security was subordinated to political benefit. Rice was sent out to lie to the lapdog press, which has not even been covering the story. They have tried to hide the story and aid Obama (e.g. Candy Crowley). Crowley should be fired and never work as a journalist in this country again. This is evidence that the Obama White House will subordinate the lives of American patriots to political convenience. This is evidence the White House does not put American national security interests ahead of their political agenda. The intelligence community can never trust the Obama White House again, never. The military cannot trust the Obama White House ever again, ever. We can never trust the liberal media again, ever. You know, you said it all so well, I can't even think of anything to add... Thank you. And you are right, it's evidence, but will it be just brushed under the rug, and TPTB just dare us to "push the issue"!!! I'm so sick of the way that this supposed most transparant government(campaign promise 2008) is handling things. They NEVER tell us the TRUTH about anything. |
| Carol B. User ID: 21050000 United States11/16/2012 05:27 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is big news. Valerie Jarrett no doubt ordered the change. She is Obama's handler. Quoting: Patch The intelligence report was changed by the White House for political reasons to aid a political campaign. National security was subordinated to political benefit. Rice was sent out to lie to the lapdog press, which has not even been covering the story. They have tried to hide the story and aid Obama (e.g. Candy Crowley). Crowley should be fired and never work as a journalist in this country again. This is evidence that the Obama White House will subordinate the lives of American patriots to political convenience. This is evidence the White House does not put American national security interests ahead of their political agenda. The intelligence community can never trust the Obama White House again, never. The military cannot trust the Obama White House ever again, ever. We can never trust the liberal media again, ever. Well put! I agree 100%! Prayer.....the world's first wireless connection. |
| KenTx2011 (OP) User ID: 26295520 United States11/16/2012 05:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to theulstermanreport.com] Quoting: KenTx2011 ***Snip*** RI: The general opened up the…the “can of worms” this morning. We now have a four star general and CIA Director letting lawmakers know that there was serious alterations to the CIA summary of the Benghazi attack. All references to it being a terrorist attack were…they were removed from the original CIA document. Now I am left asking where is that original document. If that was provided by the general, and it’s being reviewed by the committee, then that committee has no choice but to go right back to the White House and ask…it’s the two questions everybody is already asking right now. I’ve been hearing it all morning and afternoon now. WHY was it changed? WHO changed it? UM: Who would have the authority to do that? To alter the CIA Director’s assessment, right? RI: Exactly – exactly. Who could do that? Has to be high up. Administration. And whoever did that, how…who would do that without the president’s stamp? Without his approval? Now I was…I heard from a staffer…they said it was the campaign. The campaign reviewed it and changed it and sent Rice out onto the Sunday news shows. That sounds…well, it’s outrageous. But…it…all of the campaigning the president was doing…has been…he’s been at it for over two years. The campaing has always been his priority. So…so maybe that’s possible. Now that’s not a minor point here. If national security…the death of an ambassador and three other Americans…now if that…(inaudible)…so if there was a decision from the campaign, then…well…I’ll say it. That could be cause for impeachment. The president would be in violation of his oath. At least it’s how I understand it. Holly Crap!!! The General did lay it out there didn't he? I am proudd he did it. It has been smelling like White House was in this all along to avoid any campaign problems. This info really make sense. Makes many things much more clear. Now we will see who they through under the bus next. Or who ends up missing or worse. IT's going to happen before Obummer goes down others will. The four in Lybia were the first.I'm sure that if we're ever told the truth about this, then I'm afraid that we won't like it a bit, but the truth is important especially in today's world. As the saying goes, "The Truth shall set us free". I'm afraid that it will be a little scary to learn all the truth, but we've got out big people clothes on, and we can "Handle the Truth". |
| KenTx2011 (OP) User ID: 26295520 United States11/16/2012 05:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is evidence that the Obama White House will subordinate the lives of American patriots to political convenience. This is evidence the White House does not put American national security interests ahead of their political agenda. If only this shit would have come out before the election, but that was their plan all along wasn't it? |
| Patch User ID: 26085824 United States11/16/2012 05:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Travis Bickle Vigilantes need love too.... User ID: 26788702 United States11/16/2012 05:39 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| T Ceti H.C. Radnarg User ID: 27089841 United States11/16/2012 05:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to theulstermanreport.com] Quoting: KenTx2011 ***Snip*** RI: The general opened up the…the “can of worms” this morning. We now have a four star general and CIA Director letting lawmakers know that there was serious alterations to the CIA summary of the Benghazi attack. All references to it being a terrorist attack were…they were removed from the original CIA document. Now I am left asking where is that original document. If that was provided by the general, and it’s being reviewed by the committee, then that committee has no choice but to go right back to the White House and ask…it’s the two questions everybody is already asking right now. I’ve been hearing it all morning and afternoon now. WHY was it changed? WHO changed it? UM: Who would have the authority to do that? To alter the CIA Director’s assessment, right? RI: Exactly – exactly. Who could do that? Has to be high up. Administration. And whoever did that, how…who would do that without the president’s stamp? Without his approval? Now I was…I heard from a staffer…they said it was the campaign. The campaign reviewed it and changed it and sent Rice out onto the Sunday news shows. That sounds…well, it’s outrageous. But…it…all of the campaigning the president was doing…has been…he’s been at it for over two years. The campaing has always been his priority. So…so maybe that’s possible. Now that’s not a minor point here. If national security…the death of an ambassador and three other Americans…now if that…(inaudible)…so if there was a decision from the campaign, then…well…I’ll say it. That could be cause for impeachment. The president would be in violation of his oath. At least it’s how I understand it.  How unfortunate for some rulers when men,women,and children continue to think... Keep repeating the lies loud enough and long enough and just maybe the people will start to believe the lies again and good luck with that...finding your energy open until mars becomes raging aries... |
| KenTx2011 (OP) User ID: 26295520 United States11/16/2012 05:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| KenTx2011 (OP) User ID: 26295520 United States11/16/2012 05:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to theulstermanreport.com] Quoting: KenTx2011 ***Snip*** RI: The general opened up the…the “can of worms” this morning. We now have a four star general and CIA Director letting lawmakers know that there was serious alterations to the CIA summary of the Benghazi attack. All references to it being a terrorist attack were…they were removed from the original CIA document. Now I am left asking where is that original document. If that was provided by the general, and it’s being reviewed by the committee, then that committee has no choice but to go right back to the White House and ask…it’s the two questions everybody is already asking right now. I’ve been hearing it all morning and afternoon now. WHY was it changed? WHO changed it? UM: Who would have the authority to do that? To alter the CIA Director’s assessment, right? RI: Exactly – exactly. Who could do that? Has to be high up. Administration. And whoever did that, how…who would do that without the president’s stamp? Without his approval? Now I was…I heard from a staffer…they said it was the campaign. The campaign reviewed it and changed it and sent Rice out onto the Sunday news shows. That sounds…well, it’s outrageous. But…it…all of the campaigning the president was doing…has been…he’s been at it for over two years. The campaing has always been his priority. So…so maybe that’s possible. Now that’s not a minor point here. If national security…the death of an ambassador and three other Americans…now if that…(inaudible)…so if there was a decision from the campaign, then…well…I’ll say it. That could be cause for impeachment. The president would be in violation of his oath. At least it’s how I understand it. Alice?... as in Wonderland? LOL |
| KenTx2011 (OP) User ID: 26295520 United States11/16/2012 05:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| AdHocBOHICA User ID: 19723065 United States11/16/2012 05:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| KenTx2011 (OP) User ID: 26295520 United States11/16/2012 06:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Chef User ID: 11167700 United States11/16/2012 06:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| AdHocBOHICA User ID: 19723065 United States11/16/2012 06:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| AdHocBOHICA User ID: 19723065 United States11/16/2012 06:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The jealous negro in the white house changed it. His loyalties lie with the muslims not america. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1711362 He's got white blood in him, idiot! It was the "Negro" part, Idiot! “Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.” ~Seneca PS: I Stole this from another member.... ;) |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17065203 United States11/16/2012 06:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| KenTx2011 (OP) User ID: 26295520 United States11/16/2012 06:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The jealous negro in the white house changed it. His loyalties lie with the muslims not america. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1711362 He's got white blood in him, idiot! He doesn't admit that, why should we.... He only holds onto his "black" side, he hates the fact that his mother was white.... he never talks about being half and half, he only talks about his "dark" side.... I thought everbody knew that. |
| KenTx2011 (OP) User ID: 26295520 United States11/16/2012 06:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| KenTx2011 (OP) User ID: 26295520 United States11/16/2012 06:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27895786 United States11/16/2012 06:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They are just going to keep passing it around like a hot potato. Who changed the info on the CIA report? ... "I don't know, maybe it was Panetta" Panetta: "No wasn't me but it might have been Valerie." Valerie: "Ah hell no, it wasn't changed in the first place that is what it said when Petraeus gave it to us." Petraeus: "The documents were changed, I don't know who changed them." and on and on and on, playing as if they are "trying to get to the bottom of this" when they have zero intention of doing jack shit. |
| KenTx2011 (OP) User ID: 26295520 United States11/16/2012 06:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They are just going to keep passing it around like a hot potato. Who changed the info on the CIA report? ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27895786 "I don't know, maybe it was Panetta" Panetta: "No wasn't me but it might have been Valerie." Valerie: "Ah hell no, it wasn't changed in the first place that is what it said when Petraeus gave it to us." Petraeus: "The documents were changed, I don't know who changed them." and on and on and on, playing as if they are "trying to get to the bottom of this" when they have zero intention of doing jack shit. unfortunately, you are probably right.... this transparant government is so good at telling the truth!!! LOL.. not even close!!! |
