New York City Will Demolish Hundreds of Storm-Hit Homes *Agenda 21 FTW

They grabbed a whole bunch of homes for ten cents on the dollar when they expanded the Everglades.
[link to www.foxnews.com]

You really don't own property is what it comes down to, you are just a long term tenant.

I should say I'm prolly younger than most of you so sorry if this is a dumb question.

Where are all the people who lived in those houses now?

Are they in camps?

Who set up the camps?

Where can I see these camps?
Any footage or stuff?

tyvm.

Any part of NYC that gets bulldozed over is a small step in the right direction. The entire city is a corrupt, money-sucking toilet.

gone dude. gone.

some prolly moved in with family.

but

the gov set up disaster camps in staten island

and there was talks of using a former prison as recently as last week to house 900 ppl

This^^^^^^

BASTARDS!



That is all.

FEMA shelters in northeast resemble police state prison camps
[link to www.naturalnews.com]

OMG OMG houses near where I live got hit by a tornado and after a year of not being repaired,the city razed them,AGENDA 21.

Houses near me that fell into foreclosure and sat empty for over two years because they couldn't be sold were razed to the ground for safety reasons,AGENDA 21. OMG

FN dumbass fear mongers.

cluepon....being aware of your crap & actually overcoming your crap are 2 very different things.

whatchU need is a fudgie the whale cake from carvel.

nom on that while you let that cut below your nose heal.

Didn't we have a bunch of threads about that a couple of months ago, economy being so bad people had to move back home to their folks etc.?

Trash economy -> People forced to pool together -> Agenda 21 plan realized because people are "naturally" moving together to survive, ie. Megacities a'la Dredd 2012, Judge Dredd 1995, Soylent Green and Total Recall 2012.

yessirreeee
:FletchFist7:

OMG!!! I just had a meltdown over this!

HBG city was buying up via their "harrisburg authority" city property; condemns, del taxes....et al - and the fuckers were sitting there in worse blight than before.

*if it was your property in blight, or had high grass/weeds you'd be citated in a nano second.

Last Edited by Phennommennonn on 11/17/2012 08:27 PM

Good. Use some fucking common sense when you choose where to live. Tax dollars have been rebuilding sister fuckin huckleberries shacks in the flood plains of the Mississippi river forever. Not as much any more though which I applaud. And those were just really shacks. Fuck rebuilding peoples beachfront bungalows with everybody elses money.

I'm just learning about Agenda 21, how does it tie in with these guys?

[link to www.icleiusa.org]

I know one of the ideas used to be to get everyone to move away from the beach concentrate in mega cities to avoid the giant global warming storms, but that was back in the 70's. We were all going to end up in domes or something?

the wheels of the bus go round & round

Hi Ink! (Fellow NJ here) you are so right. Some of those homes could have been saved if they had agreed to have the dunes built to protect them. I saw that story in the Star Ledger.

[link to mobile.nj.com]


The foolish man builds his house upon the sand. No one can tame the ocean.

So what ? People can read the newspapers for themselves.

Breaking... LOL.

you should take your own comment to heed.

this threads not titled "breaking"

Easier to destroy them than to rebuild them. property owners still own the land and have the option to sell. Problem is the POS insurance companies. Following the corrupt roll models in London and DC, the insurance companies say, "sorry, not covered against hurricane damage...and times are too tuff for us to simply give away money....cough/ BS

What isn't making the news and should be are all the churches there helping and giving away items and materials. Calvary chapel alone is making a huge dent. All the other churches are doing awesome as well.

Something the 'corrupt' and 'corrupt owned news channels' would never let out of the bag.

most those without are renters. "Obama is going to buy me a new home" types.

jmo

Federal Corporation, called a 'government, KNOWS they WILL default on Feds debt/dollar AND the Breton Woods agreement STATES if they do, All creditors will be allowed " Government Lands', to satisfy the debt OWED !

Wake up, fools ! Corporation called The United States of America is in TOTAL CONTROL. But then you DON'T know this, so shot the messenger, pretend YOU know it's NOT TRUE !

Eagle

many national parks are already under UN control.

This is true. Also all the furnishings inside the houses will need to be replaced; carpeting, furniture, bedding, insulation, drywall, furnaces, refrigerators, appliances, computers, toys, clothing, vehicles, and whatever. Clearly a boon to those in these various industries. As together they will boost the economy and force people to buy more stuff, even if they couldn't afford it before.

There it is, duh-(noobs gotta start somewhere :))

[link to www.iclei.org]

"International Goals and Agreements

Our programs and projects advocate participatory, long-term, strategic planning processes that address local sustainability while protecting global common goods. This approach links local action and solutions to the global challenges we are facing, and therefore also links local action to global goals and targets such as:
the Rio Conventions:The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change,
The UN Convention on Biological Diversity,
The UN Convention to Combat Desertification

Agenda 21
the Habitat Agenda
the Millennium Development Goals
the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation"

So, everything will become "global common goods"?

illegal immigrant day workers who were charging $100 a day before the storm are now charging $300 - I am paying family and friends to help me clean up - they are unemployed citizens - this storm seems like wealth re-distribution to me

Not really. There are many good, decent people who live and work there. They "landed" there, they're not blood-suckers, or crooks, or evil. They're just folks trying to eak out a living in the only place they know.

Vril Economics.tear it down to build it back/stimulate the economy..

...it gonna be impossible to convict anyone with trespassing on "federal" land..when the accuser has to face the accused in court with the deed in their hand to prove you were trespassing...that deed has to have the owners name on it and the owner has to face you in a court of law to prove you were trespassing on their land...

whatre you denny fuckin crane??

its called READING - top to bottom, left to right - grouping words together as a sentence.

i didnt say the UN "owned" the parks...i said they are under UN control

some US national parks are designated as world heritage sites and/or man/biosphere reserves by the united nations educational, scientific, and cultural organization (UNESCO), which affords them some additional legal means for protection in international disputes, but does not pay the bills. The US national parks are owned by the united states, dept of the interior, national park service.

our national parks were given to the UN via 1972
With the signing of the 1972 World Heritage Treaty, which established the U.N. World Heritage Sites, the United States legally obligated itself to manage our historic national landmarks in compliance with U.N., not U.S., standards.2 The U.S. has also allowed vast amounts of land to become U.N.-designated Biosphere Reserves. A Biosphere Reserve is an area that is set aside specifically for conservation and scientific study which, like a World Heritage Site, the United States promises to manage in accordance with U.N. standards.
[link to www.nationalcenter.org]

The Biodiversity Treaty is one in a disturbing trend of environmental agreements that defer important decisions to a "Conference of the Parties" (CoP,) which will serve as a future policy-making body. For instance, Article 8 requires that each nation-party establish a system of protected areas, defined as "a geographically defined area which is designated or regulated and managed to achieve specific conservation objectives." The CoP will establish the criteria for such areas, after the Senate has ratified the Treaty and relinquished any further responsibility for advise and consent. Should a party to the treaty fail to meet that criteria, it would not be in compliance and subject to sanctions imposed by the CoP. These sanctions will most probably take the form of an internal "resource use tax" to be transferred to underdeveloped nations to achieve an "equitable distribution of benefits."

The Clinton administration began preparations as early as 1992 to implement the treaty. After appointing individuals from environmental organizations such as Bruce Babbitt, George Frampton and Brooks Yeager to key federal agency positions, a White House Ecosystem Management Task Force was created. The Department of the Interior and the Environmental Protection Agency took the lead in the "reinvention of government" in alignment with biocentrism. An Interagency Ecosystem Management Coordinating Group was created consisting of policy-making officials from 20 departments and agencies. A massive Ecosystem Management Policy was devised to be implemented through Executive Order. A policy of administrative changes in existing law through "rulemaking" is clearly evident in Rangeland Reform, the recent proposed changes in the U.S. Forest Service mission and claimed "inability" of the agency to comply with with a recent law to permit increased salvage logging for reduction of forest fuels. [link to www.iahushua.com]