WTC Towers Designed to Withstand Impact of Loaded Boeing 707

Not exactly the house of cards that we've been lead to believe it was.

even more they were built to withstand "multiple" jet impacts

And a hit from a 747, not just a 707.

The WTC Towers didn't fall down because of any plane crash.

they should of designed it to resist thermite and mossad bombs.

And they've been hiding that fact in plain sight every since.

It's frightening to know that there are people who know what we are going to think before we think it.

It's even more disconcerting to know that they use their knowledge to do evil before our very eyes and convince the masses that they're not seeing what they obviously saw.

Twin towers were brought down by controlled demolition.

It's a funny world we're living in, ain't it.

Hilarious!

I will say this though: Nothing easier in this world than to deceive a deceiver.

It's their achilles heel.

I thought someone had bumped a 2005 thread or something.

911 conspiracy topic has been closed for years because it is at the point where everyone has reached a conclusion on it (be it fact-based or fantasy-based), and they're not about to change their minds now. People don't like to learn they have been wrong for years, so they stick to it with religious fervor.

9/11 religion bump

bump this pit

Shaped charges are the problem, not aircraft.

fwiw: The 767 max weight is 50,000 pounds HIGHER than the max weight of the 707.

The WTC buildings DID withstand the planes crashing into them!! In that respect the design was very robust and exceeded it's design goals.

What caused the collapse is the same thing that almost caused the collapse of the Prudential Tower in Philidelphia a few years before ... fire weakening the structural steel supporting the floor above the fire.

In the Prudential building situation on the floors above the fire the sprinkler system remained functional and when it kicked on it dampened down the fire and ended up controlling them. Even with that the upper floors started to buckle and the building ended up with a 6 to 12 foot sideways cant to it (if I am recalling the engineering reports correctly) once the fire was extinguished.

-------------------------

707-120B - Operating empty 55,589kg (122,533lb), max takeoff 116,575kg (257,000lb).
707-320B - Empty 66,406kg (146,400lb), max takeoff 151,315kg (333,600lb).
[link to www.airliners.net]

767-200 - Empty with JT9Ds 74,752kg (164,800lb), with CF6s 74,344kg (163,900lb). Operating empty with JT9Ds 80,920kg (178,400lb), with CF6s 80,510kg (177,500lb). Max takeoff 136,078kg (300,000lb), medium range max takeoff 142,881kg (315,000lb).
767-200ER - Empty with PW4056s 76,566kg (168,800lb), with CF680C2B4s 76,476kg (168,600lb), operating empty with PW4056s 84,415kg (186,100lb), with CF680C2B4Fs 84,370kg (186,000lb).
Max takeoff with PW4056s or CF680C2B4Fs 175,540kg (387,000lb).
[link to www.airliners.net]

I sat next to an architect on a flight back to Europe that was asked in the early 70's, by the World Trade Center architects to check out the metal they were using. (This guy was also an expert on materials, namely buildings, withstanding airplane and other extreme impacts, like storms.)

He handed it back to them and said something like, "glad I'm not using that on my sky scrappers, this will not withstand massive stress."

He said he saw that architect again a few years after 9/11. All he said to him was, "you were right."
And walked away.

It is an engineer who calculates the structural design and dynamic load. They are separate disciplines. I have worked around the globe in construction throughout the better part of my life. I have met very few architects with the ability to do both as I have met few artists - painters that are able to formulate the base colours that they paint with. It seems the engineering that is at fault, although design has synergy with the overall structural integrity. It is not the architects stamp on the prints rather the engineers. Please quantify how the guy you met on the plane knew what he was talking about and how you came to your conclusion.

We know. Look up "The Third Truth."

wow ,we all know. when will weeeeeeeeeeee bring to justice the perps? never

Ya I seen that in the movie loose change. The buildings did fall in a way that they should if it was demolition. Plus they found the residue all over ground zero. Then there is the whole building 7 Thing. It's pretty obvious like most other truths we can do nothing about cuz most of our population doesn't care and just wants to hate middle eastern Muslims.

Honestly I believed the governments BS till about 2008 or 2009. People are still starting to wake up on this. I think this thing shouldn't be buried under the rug because the conspiracy veterans already drew their conclusion. Thanks OP for keeping this topic alive. And just a reminder 9/11 was a huge deal just In case you forgot.

The truth never gets old.

Did they ever find the architect that went missing soon after 911?

Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length]

Dimitri Khazelov describes in 4 Hour documentary that WTC towers were collapsed by Nuclear Demolition Charges.

Click on the link.....

[link to m.youtube.com]