Earthquake Pattern : Do you see what I see ? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8066033 United States 11/19/2012 11:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | February 27, 2010 Maule, Chile 2010 Chile earthquake 8.8 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28043957 March 11, 2011 Pacific Ocean, Tōhoku region, Japan 2011 Tōhoku earthquake 9.0 April 11, 2012 Indian Ocean, Sumatra, Indonesia 2012 Aceh earthquake 8.6 [link to en.wikipedia.org] Ummmmmm no,please explain OP |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18374229 United States 11/19/2012 11:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | February 27, 2010 Maule, Chile 2010 Chile earthquake 8.8 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28043957 March 11, 2011 Pacific Ocean, Tōhoku region, Japan 2011 Tōhoku earthquake 9.0 April 11, 2012 Indian Ocean, Sumatra, Indonesia 2012 Aceh earthquake 8.6 [link to en.wikipedia.org] May 2013 |
Sol Neman User ID: 25567431 United States 11/20/2012 12:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | February 27, 2010 Maule, Chile 2010 Chile earthquake 8.8 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28043957 March 11, 2011 Pacific Ocean, Tōhoku region, Japan 2011 Tōhoku earthquake 9.0 April 11, 2012 Indian Ocean, Sumatra, Indonesia 2012 Aceh earthquake 8.6 [link to en.wikipedia.org] May 2013 Things that make you go ah ha... Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty ~ Thomas Jefferson |
Solar Guardian User ID: 28046218 Malaysia 11/20/2012 12:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I already explained that here: Thread: Every 5 Months after certain triple-number dates, occurs a large earthquake This close to Earth's ascension to 4th density, triple dates are very significant and marks Earth's birthing process acceleration. Read here: [link to www.examiner.com] "2010 to 2012 and the Earth’s light grid During his Exopolitics Radio interview, Mr. Kane relates the “Council of Twelve” discussing a series of significant triple dates ranging from January 1, 2001 (01/01/01) through December 12, 2012 (12/12/12). According to Mr. Kane, the “Council of Twelve” has stated “these triple dates are numeric light codes that activate and open 12 major facets of the Earth grid over the 12 years from 2001 through 2012.” In the interview, Mr. Kane discusses some of the characteristics which the Council of Twelve described may be associated with upcoming triple dates on October 10, 2010 (10/10/10), November 11, 2011 (11/11/11), and December 12, 2012 (12/12/12/). Mr. Kane describes the “Council of Twelve” as stating that during the nine days from December 12, 2012 (12/12/12) to December 21, 2012, the planet Earth will split dimensionally into two separate Earths, each of which has different dimensional frequencies. Mr. Kane describes this as a process analogous to the way that a single cell can split into two cells." Now, I looked at the earthquake statistics, and around 5 months after 9/9/9 or September 9 2009, there was a Mag 8.8 earthquake in Chile in February 27 2010. Then, 5 months after October 10 2010, there was a Mag 9.0 in Japan in March 11 2011. Lastly, 5 months after 11/11/11 or November 11 2011, there was a double Mag 8.6 and Mag 8.2 earthquake near Sumatra that literally broke that Indo-Australian plate on April 11 2012. Next: May 2013. :damned: Last Edited by Solar Guardian on 11/20/2012 12:15 AM |
Sol Neman User ID: 25567431 United States 11/20/2012 12:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | February 27, 2010 Maule, Chile 2010 Chile earthquake 8.8 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28043957 March 11, 2011 Pacific Ocean, Tōhoku region, Japan 2011 Tōhoku earthquake 9.0 April 11, 2012 Indian Ocean, Sumatra, Indonesia 2012 Aceh earthquake 8.6 [link to en.wikipedia.org] May 2013 Things that make you go ah ha... For those that don't see it February, March, April... 2010 2011 2012... Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty ~ Thomas Jefferson |
Sol Neman User ID: 25567431 United States 11/20/2012 12:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I already explained that here: Thread: Every 5 Months after certain triple-number dates, occurs a large earthquake Quoting: Solar Guardian The pattern above is every 13 months, not 5. Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty ~ Thomas Jefferson |
Solar Guardian User ID: 28046218 Malaysia 11/20/2012 12:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I already explained that here: Thread: Every 5 Months after certain triple-number dates, occurs a large earthquake Quoting: Solar Guardian The pattern above is every 13 months, not 5. That's true. But what's also true is, quakes above Mag 8.6 occur 5 months after every triple dates starting from November 9 2009. For example, 5 months after 9/9/9, a Mag 8.8 quake in February 27 2010 Chile. Then, 5 months after 10/10/10, a Mag 9.0 quake in Japan in March 11 2011, which is 5 months later. Then, 5 months after November 11 2011, a double Mag 8.6 and Mag 8.2 quake near Sumatra in April 11 2012. Next up, December 12 2012. Last Edited by Solar Guardian on 11/20/2012 12:19 AM |
Sol Neman User ID: 25567431 United States 11/20/2012 12:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I already explained that here: Thread: Every 5 Months after certain triple-number dates, occurs a large earthquake Quoting: Solar Guardian The pattern above is every 13 months, not 5. That's true. But what's also true is, quakes above Mag 8.6 occur 5 months after every triple dates starting from November 9 2009. For example, 5 months after 9/9/9, a Mag 8.8 quake in February 27 2010 Chile. Then, 5 months after 10/10/10, a Mag 9.0 quake in Japan in March 11 2011, which is 5 months later. Then, 5 months after November 11 2011, a double Mag 8.6 and Mag 8.2 quake near Sumatra in April 11 2012. Next up, December 12 2012. So, every 18 months in other words? Last Edited by Sol Neman on 11/20/2012 12:30 AM Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty ~ Thomas Jefferson |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25998001 United States 11/20/2012 12:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Solar Guardian User ID: 28046218 Malaysia 11/20/2012 12:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I already explained that here: Thread: Every 5 Months after certain triple-number dates, occurs a large earthquake Quoting: Solar Guardian The pattern above is every 13 months, not 5. That's true. But what's also true is, quakes above Mag 8.6 occur 5 months after every triple dates starting from November 9 2009. For example, 5 months after 9/9/9, a Mag 8.8 quake in February 27 2010 Chile. Then, 5 months after 10/10/10, a Mag 9.0 quake in Japan in March 11 2011, which is 5 months later. Then, 5 months after November 11 2011, a double Mag 8.6 and Mag 8.2 quake near Sumatra in April 11 2012. Next up, December 12 2012. So, every 18 months in other words? Yup, but I think the next one, May 2013, would probably be the last. |
joe User ID: 25641849 United States 11/20/2012 12:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Solar Guardian User ID: 28046218 Malaysia 11/20/2012 12:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | oh my,,, and did you notice too, that in all the months that have at least 28 days in them there is an earthquake. there is a pattern....LOL!!! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25998001 This is a clear pattern for the occurrence of large quakes above Mag 8.6. Way back then in the 1970s-1990s, they only have an average of Mag 8.0-Mag 8.3 quakes every 1-3 years. Earthquakes Mag 8.6 and above have never occurred every year with the same pattern now that's started since the Chile earthquake on late February 2010. Last Edited by Solar Guardian on 11/20/2012 12:35 AM |
Sol Neman User ID: 25567431 United States 11/20/2012 12:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I already explained that here: Thread: Every 5 Months after certain triple-number dates, occurs a large earthquake Quoting: Solar Guardian The pattern above is every 13 months, not 5. That's true. But what's also true is, quakes above Mag 8.6 occur 5 months after every triple dates starting from November 9 2009. For example, 5 months after 9/9/9, a Mag 8.8 quake in February 27 2010 Chile. Then, 5 months after 10/10/10, a Mag 9.0 quake in Japan in March 11 2011, which is 5 months later. Then, 5 months after November 11 2011, a double Mag 8.6 and Mag 8.2 quake near Sumatra in April 11 2012. Next up, December 12 2012. So, every 18 months in other words? That's an interesting coincidence. The large quakes are occurring every 13 months, and this 13 month cycle happens to make all the dates of the earthquakes occur 5 months after a triple digit date. Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty ~ Thomas Jefferson |
Solar Guardian User ID: 28046218 Malaysia 11/20/2012 12:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's true. But what's also true is, quakes above Mag 8.6 occur 5 months after every triple dates starting from November 9 2009. For example, 5 months after 9/9/9, a Mag 8.8 quake in February 27 2010 Chile. Then, 5 months after 10/10/10, a Mag 9.0 quake in Japan in March 11 2011, which is 5 months later. Then, 5 months after November 11 2011, a double Mag 8.6 and Mag 8.2 quake near Sumatra in April 11 2012. Next up, December 12 2012. So, every 18 months in other words? That's an interesting coincidence. The large quakes are occurring every 13 months, and this 13 month cycle happens to make all the dates of the earthquakes occur 5 months after a triple digit date. Yes, and I think this last triple date: 12/12/12(since there are no 13th month for a year), is the last in this cycle. The big one. The final one. The be-it-end-it-all Big One. Planetary Quakes. Pole Shift.... Last Edited by Solar Guardian on 11/20/2012 12:39 AM |
Sol Neman User ID: 25567431 United States 11/20/2012 12:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's true. But what's also true is, quakes above Mag 8.6 occur 5 months after every triple dates starting from November 9 2009. For example, 5 months after 9/9/9, a Mag 8.8 quake in February 27 2010 Chile. Then, 5 months after 10/10/10, a Mag 9.0 quake in Japan in March 11 2011, which is 5 months later. Then, 5 months after November 11 2011, a double Mag 8.6 and Mag 8.2 quake near Sumatra in April 11 2012. Next up, December 12 2012. So, every 18 months in other words? That's an interesting coincidence. The large quakes are occurring every 13 months, and this 13 month cycle happens to make all the dates of the earthquakes occur 5 months after a triple digit date. Solar Guardian, if you have the data going back to the 70's perhaps you could take a look and see if there is a pattern where every 5th cycle or 13th cycle there is an abnormally devastating quake. Not necessarily the magnitude, more like loss of life and property. I like the work you've done so far but only showing the data for 5 years is not compelling evidence when discussing Earth's geology. Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty ~ Thomas Jefferson |
Solar Guardian User ID: 28046218 Malaysia 11/20/2012 12:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Solar Guardian That's true. But what's also true is, quakes above Mag 8.6 occur 5 months after every triple dates starting from November 9 2009. For example, 5 months after 9/9/9, a Mag 8.8 quake in February 27 2010 Chile. Then, 5 months after 10/10/10, a Mag 9.0 quake in Japan in March 11 2011, which is 5 months later. Then, 5 months after November 11 2011, a double Mag 8.6 and Mag 8.2 quake near Sumatra in April 11 2012. Next up, December 12 2012. So, every 18 months in other words? That's an interesting coincidence. The large quakes are occurring every 13 months, and this 13 month cycle happens to make all the dates of the earthquakes occur 5 months after a triple digit date. Solar Guardian, if you have the data going back to the 70's perhaps you could take a look and see if there is a pattern where every 5th cycle or 13th cycle there is an abnormally devastating quake. Not necessarily the magnitude, more like loss of life and property. I like the work you've done so far but only showing the data for 5 years is not compelling evidence when discussing Earth's geology. Sorry, but to me the most important is the magnitude of the quake. Due to various circumstances, including building structure composition, epicenter of quake from major population centers, and depth of quake, even a Mag 6 could kill lots of people. The most important is magnitude of quakes above Mag 8.6. |
Sol Neman User ID: 25567431 United States 11/20/2012 12:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Solar Guardian That's true. But what's also true is, quakes above Mag 8.6 occur 5 months after every triple dates starting from November 9 2009. For example, 5 months after 9/9/9, a Mag 8.8 quake in February 27 2010 Chile. Then, 5 months after 10/10/10, a Mag 9.0 quake in Japan in March 11 2011, which is 5 months later. Then, 5 months after November 11 2011, a double Mag 8.6 and Mag 8.2 quake near Sumatra in April 11 2012. Next up, December 12 2012. So, every 18 months in other words? That's an interesting coincidence. The large quakes are occurring every 13 months, and this 13 month cycle happens to make all the dates of the earthquakes occur 5 months after a triple digit date. Yes, and I think this last triple date: 12/12/12(since there are no 13th month for a year), is the last in this cycle. The big one. The final one. The be-it-end-it-all Big One. Planetary Quakes. Pole Shift.... It's the last one of this cycle that began in 2001, the cycle repeats every century for the first 12 years of the century. I'm more interested to know if any kind of devastating quake occurred in May 1913. Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty ~ Thomas Jefferson |
Sol Neman User ID: 25567431 United States 11/20/2012 01:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's an interesting coincidence. The large quakes are occurring every 13 months, and this 13 month cycle happens to make all the dates of the earthquakes occur 5 months after a triple digit date. Solar Guardian, if you have the data going back to the 70's perhaps you could take a look and see if there is a pattern where every 5th cycle or 13th cycle there is an abnormally devastating quake. Not necessarily the magnitude, more like loss of life and property. I like the work you've done so far but only showing the data for 5 years is not compelling evidence when discussing Earth's geology. Sorry, but to me the most important is the magnitude of the quake. Due to various circumstances, including building structure composition, epicenter of quake from major population centers, and depth of quake, even a Mag 6 could kill lots of people. The most important is magnitude of quakes above Mag 8.6. I wasn't saying disregard magnitude completely, I was saying you also need to factor in other things such as loss of life and property loss. Having a 7.7 in Seattle is much more devastating than a 8.8 off the coast of Alaska that only clears the uninhabited coastline of trees. Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty ~ Thomas Jefferson |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1277549 United States 11/20/2012 01:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sol Neman User ID: 25567431 United States 11/20/2012 01:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to en.wikipedia.org] [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty ~ Thomas Jefferson |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26137794 Philippines 11/20/2012 01:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14541046 United States 11/20/2012 01:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sol Neman User ID: 25567431 United States 11/20/2012 01:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Damn I wish I could speed up time to May just to see your faces when you are wrong, again. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14541046 I just debunked myself, trust but verify is a good motto. At first glance it looked good, but upon further research I found it was completely wrong. I can't speak for OP or Solar Guardian, but I am not convinced of this pattern as of yet. Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty ~ Thomas Jefferson |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1516077 United States 11/20/2012 01:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Solar Guardian User ID: 28132572 Malaysia 11/20/2012 05:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ok, I did so more digging online, both of these patterns fall apart once you go further back than 2009. Yes, for the last 3 years we've had a large quakes every 13 months, prior to that there is no pattern whatsoever. Sorry these theories just don't work. Was a novel idea though. Quoting: Sol Neman [link to en.wikipedia.org] [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] These theories work, since Mr. Kane does specify these four triple digit dates as the most significant(9/9/9, 10/10/10, 11/11/11 and 12/12/12). Personally, I just think those are countdown dates for Earth birthing into a new planet of a new level and countdown for the arrival of the Galactic Wave 21/12/12. |
MatrixLNIN11 User ID: 20347511 United States 11/20/2012 09:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | February 27, 2010 Maule, Chile 2010 Chile earthquake 8.8 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28043957 March 11, 2011 Pacific Ocean, Tōhoku region, Japan 2011 Tōhoku earthquake 9.0 April 11, 2012 Indian Ocean, Sumatra, Indonesia 2012 Aceh earthquake 8.6 [link to en.wikipedia.org] I see one... |