I work for NASA. Ask me a question.

That depends if space itself can be bent faster than the speed of light, in my humbly slightly educated guess.

really dude? really?

Who? Yeah, I don't believe in man made global warming, either.

I guess that's a no. Let's try this. Why is NASA's web site designed in a way that searching for particular info, or video.ie. live video, that it causes frustration? Is this buy design? Or just poor web management?

Why not? There are tons of circuit protection techniques, plenty I've never used I'm sure. Transorbs, diodes, capacitors, and inductors are what I've used. Unless he gives me a schematic and I spend a couple of hours interfacing with him, the only things I can suggest are very generalized. A google search should get him going in the right direction.

[link to www.spacecraftfilms.com]
That's the most convenient way to get it. NASA has not digitized most of their older stuff themselves, but if there's something specific you want, contact the public affairs office of the relevant center (KSC, for example) and tell them you've got a science blog and you're doing an entry on such and such and ask for whatever it is you want. I've found them to be very helpful, even when whatever it is hasn't been digitized yet. They've been making a deliberate effort to help bloggers/twitters (twits?)/web 2.0'ers lately (hence all the tweet-up events).

Idk but I hate the main site as well. Not a big fan of NASA's use of the web so far.

Thoughts.

No, we're not. Below is from this website, so believe it or not.

[link to www.nasa.gov]

In fact, astronomy cannot pinpoint such a "galactic alignment" to within a year, much less a day. The alignment depends on the rather arbitrary modern definition of the galactic equator, and/or the visual appearance of the Milky Way. There is no precise definition of the Milky Way's edges -- they are very vague and depend on the clarity of your view. (Jenkins says that he personally established the Milky Way’s edges by viewing it from 11,000 feet, far above anywhere the Maya lived.) So to give a precise visual position for its centerline is not meaningful.

Last Edited by Quagmire on 11/20/2012 02:51 PM

Not high on the security clearance pole if that's really the case. Unless you are the typical NASA bullshitter...lol.

You're ignoring the fact that all of these measurements were passed onto us by the Annunaki! :-P



Last Edited by tandym on 11/20/2012 02:54 PM

That is an exciting proposal, but it still requires "exotic matter" which may not even exist, and even if it does, it may end up vaporizing the solar system you arrive at...
[link to www.extremetech.com]

Actually that was going to be my next question.... do you take your smart phone to work?

Nothing wrong with an iPhone for security. Many folks I work with have smartphones. But no, I don't have a high security clearance.

Yup. Many folks with androids and iPhones now.

Thankyou Astro, Allways the man to go too in such matters. Shame there's not a free archive, concidering it was the tax payers money that payed for the material..
Anyhow, thanks again. And buy all means keep the good info coming. A fan!

Last Edited by NervousAndJerky on 11/20/2012 02:58 PM

Yeah nothing wrong with it all so long as it does not take pics...

OK UMM IS NIBIRU REALLY OUT THERE?

Or record voice, or connect via usb... or learn 'on the go' like Furbies.

Yeah, I remember the day the memo came out telling us all that if we had a Furbie we couldn't bring it in.

Thankyou for the responce. Perhaps a note in the "Suggestion Box". Does NASA have one of those?
Astromut helped me out with my previous question, but I take this opportinity to pose it again to you. Is there a link to access all of the mission video and film?
Astromut's site is a pay to view, I'm hopwing for a .gov site.

Last Edited by NervousAndJerky on 11/20/2012 03:04 PM

WOW. Thank-you. And again, WOW.

when will NASA be announcing they are a Satanic organization. and when will NASA admit that it wants to farm negative polarity conducting material from asteroids.

Even if it did on its own or was remotely hacked or some shit, it would see cubicles and old buildings and low clearance crap. No concerns where I work regarding pics being taken of stuff.

Technically the footage from spacecraft films is free to taxpayers... in its original form, which is often not digital or useful to most people. Spacecraft films did the hard work of converting the various old films, tapes, etc to a digital format, burned them onto DVDs, and that is what you're really paying for; the conversion and organization of the footage itself. It's enough of a pain in the ass that even major networks get their footage from him rather than doing that work themselves.

No proof yet that it is.

Hehehehe. Nice answer :-P

Probably never.

Can't prove a negative.

What about this???

[link to www.youtube.com]