Further: It is interesting to observe D. Wilcocks being the Keenan contact. Sure, I understand Keenan may also be full of shit, but his suit has lots of details about "Bruno" at the UN who thinks he is above the commoners, and is free to cut deals about the 9/11 WW2 funds that are being mentioned/revealed/discredited. The main question is, how does Keenan not get disbarred, if he is accusing Ban Ki Moon and the UN in general of being criminals? Enquiring minds want to know.